1,280 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bellhop or Baggage Porter — loading and routing a luggage cart, triaging a group check-in or motorcoach arrival that outpaces current staffing, resolving a bag-count or damage dispute against the claim-ticket trail, or deciding solo-lift vs. two-person-lift vs. hand-truck for an oversized or awkward piece.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an auto-glass installer/repairer — deciding whether a chip or crack qualifies for resin repair versus full replacement, calculating a safe drive-away time for the adhesive and conditions on a job, determining whether a windshield replacement triggers ADAS camera recalibration, or diagnosing a cut-out/pinch-weld defect before it becomes a leak or corrosion claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search, choosing or building a genomics pipeline (aligner, caller, normalization method) for a specific data-generating process, or judging whether a computational-biology analysis's statistical design actually supports the biological claim being made. Distinct from a bioinformatics-technician (executes and QC-gates an established pipeline someone else designed) and a data-scientist (general product/experimentation judgment, not genomics-specific statistics) — this role owns which method and statistical model a genomics question requires, and why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Actuary — estimating unpaid claim reserves with chain-ladder or Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods, building or reviewing a rate indication from loss experience, applying credibility weighting to thin or volatile data, drafting a statement of actuarial opinion, or diagnosing whether a reserve or pricing assumption has stopped matching reality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find broken backlinks pointing to a domain using Ahrefs: links targeting 404 pages that can be reclaimed. Prioritizes highest-DR lost links for maximum recovery impact. Use when user says "broken backlinks", "broken links", "link reclamation", "dead backlinks", or "404 backlinks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build discernment habits: nudges and checklists for evaluating claims, spotting manipulation, and thinking clearly under pressure. Use when you want better judgment about what to believe and share.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Greenhouse gas inventories and carbon footprints — scopes, emission factors, boundaries, and credible net-zero claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze medical billing and revenue cycle management software including claims processing pipelines, EDI transaction handling (837P/837I/835/270/271/276/277), ICD-10 and CPT code validation with NCCI edit checking, payer rules engine configuration, denial management and appeal workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit transit damage prediction and prevention systems for packaging failure mode analysis, handling chain risk assessment, claims pattern detection, and protection level optimization..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ingest supplied source material into an Obsidian vault with provenance and claim tracking: pasted text, files staged in the selected vault's inbox or .raw archive, or explicitly approved URLs. Use for a single source or bounded batch, not for saving an assistant answer. Triggers: ingest, ingest this file, ingest this URL, process this source, read and file this source, batch ingest, ingest these sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize and critically analyze academic papers supplied as PDFs, text, arXiv links, or journal URLs. Ground claims in the inspected version and source locations; support focused questions, deeper appraisal, and cross-paper comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit academic prose in LaTeX manuscripts or supplied text at light, moderate, or strict intensity. Improve grammar and clarity while preserving scientific claims, uncertainty, numbers, citations, and LaTeX structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate professional paid advertising across Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for account intake, source-grounded audits, strategy, budget and measurement planning, creative production, experiments, reporting, monitoring, and explicitly approved campaign changes. Also trigger on PPC, paid social, retail media, attribution, tracking, landing pages, cross-platform conversion totals, negative keywords or search terms, beta-feature scoring, stale platform claims, API-token or credential setup, campaign deletion, and safe Claude Ads installation or uninstall.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a verified Salesforce research packet into a concise, role-aware learning brief with clear objectives, concept sequencing, worked examples, release caveats, checks for understanding, and citations mapped to claims. Trigger keywords: teach me Salesforce, explain Salesforce concept, create learning brief, Salesforce study guide, role-based lesson. NOT for open-ended source discovery or freshness verification — use architect/salesforce-learning-research first. NOT for generating production metadata or changing an org.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to define and validate the requirements for a Salesforce Partner Relationship Management (PRM) implementation: deal registration flows, lead distribution models, partner tier hierarchies, MDF budget tracking, and co-marketing content entitlement. Trigger keywords: partner community requirements, PRM deal registration setup, channel partner portal requirements, lead distribution partner, partner tier management, MDF tracking, co-marketing entitlement. NOT for implementing the partner sharing model — use data/partner-data-access-patterns. NOT for building the portal in Experience Builder — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: partner portal design worksheet, partner tier licence and role depth, PartnerAccountId blank on opportunity, portal role Executive Manager User, sharing set does not support Lead, enable partner user greyed out, offboard a partner firm, PartnerMarketingBudget PartnerFundRequest PartnerFundClaim, ChannelProgramLevel partner tier, deal registration acceptance step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects mismatches between features claimed in App Store metadata and features actually implemented in the codebase, enforcing Guideline 2.3.1 which prohibits misleading app descriptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register shared claims transformation and hierarchical role policies in the API without breaking existing scope enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a finding about the configured engine MCP server into .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of what has to be re-checked here. Use right after a call reported success while changing nothing, ate an argument, or validated a broken state, e.g. "write this down", "record this MCP finding", "the server lied — note it", "add a recheck note", "trap this". Takes three forms of input: the finding in one line, a path to a plan file (harvests the "## MCP Findings" table of that plan and nothing else), or nothing at all — then it takes findings already in the session first, and offers to scan the tables of plans touched since the last audit. The table only, never the plan body. Writes in the one allowed genre — a check to perform; never a lifted gate, never a named workaround, never a claim about what the server can or cannot do. Makes zero MCP calls and needs no editor. To replay, retire, or upstream existing notes use /unikit-mcp-audit instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete MCP engineering work on the live path: build or repair servers and Apps, debug stdio or Streamable HTTP, migrate protocol/SDK/transport versions, reconcile source with package and activated runtime, inspect capability/effect authorization, and verify named-host claims without promoting weaker evidence. Use for real Model Context Protocol implementation, review, migration, runtime, or host-integration tasks. Do not use for ordinary non-MCP APIs, generic frontend work, or incidental product copy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, or deploying Solidity smart contracts — token contracts, signature-gated claim systems, merkle-gated staking vaults, allocation modules, role-based proxies, or factory patterns. Triggers on edits to `*.sol` files, `hardhat.config.*`, `foundry.toml`, deploy scripts, or mentions of "smart contract", "Solidity", "Web3", "EVM", "Hardhat", "Foundry", "ERC20/721/1155", "merkle", "staking", or "on-chain". For security audits and adversarial review see security-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。