「database」の検索結果

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes and optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, and database layers. Use when diagnosing slowness, improving load times, optimizing queries, reducing bundle size, or when asked about performance issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convex backend development guidelines. Use when writing Convex functions, schemas, queries, mutations, actions, or any backend code in a Convex project. Triggers on tasks involving Convex database operations, real-time subscriptions, file storage, or serverless functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-launch and pre-commit audit for vibe coding projects. Use when asked to check whether a project is ready to ship, deploy, merge, or commit, especially for common AI-built app mistakes: broken project structure, committed secrets or cache files, environment variable hygiene, database migrations, ORM/schema drift, unsafe raw SQL, unused legacy code, dead routes/components, weak auth, missing tests, build failures, and deployment footguns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and write a Supabase Postgres database over PostgREST: list tables, query, insert, update, and delete rows. Trigger phrases: supabase, supabase table, query supabase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gates whether a new test should exist and forces it to be efficient, protecting CI from low-value test bloat. Use before any change to what a pytest, Jest, or Playwright test asserts or sets up, down to one fixture or one assertion added to an existing block. Front-loads the value bar (every test must catch a realistic regression no existing test already catches; extend the nearest existing test before writing a new standalone one; test behavior through the public interface, not implementation details; collapse near-duplicates into parameterized cases) and the efficiency bar (deterministic, isolated, fast; pick the cheapest test level; Django TestCase over TransactionTestCase; no sleeps, no real network; no time bombs from absolute dates left to age against the real clock; no database a test never uses). Includes a "don't write it" decision tree. For fixing an existing flaky test use `/fixing-flaky-tests`; after this gate says a Playwright test is warranted, use `/playwright-test` for mechanics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure-as-code specialist for multi-cloud provisioning using Terraform across any provider (AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle Cloud). Use for terraform plan/apply, state management, compute, databases, storage, networking, IAM, OIDC, cost optimization, policy-as-code, ISO/IEC 42001 AI controls, ISO 22301 continuity, and ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 architecture documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design schemas and migrations, tune queries, or plan vector retrieval and database operations. Application API implementation uses oma-backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or optimizing developer workflows in a monorepo, managing mise tasks, git hooks, CI/CD pipelines, database migrations, or release automation. Invoke for development environment setup, build automation, testing workflows, and release coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic identifiers. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/sqli-results.md. Use when asked to find SQLi or database injection bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and server-side best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js API routes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ClickHouse database patterns, query optimization, analytics, and data engineering best practices for high-performance analytical workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Используй только внутри активного Codex Project Autopilot-проекта, когда data-layer уже относится к плану автопилота.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the `sendsets` CLI to drive SendSets as a signed-in user - sign in with `sendsets login`, run `sendsets doctor`, then connect the app (`connection`), add or test mailboxes and their warmup (`mailbox`), send product events (`events send`), and build, validate, test and launch campaigns, including app_action and wait_for_event steps, on the hosted service or any self-hosted instance. Use whenever the task is to set up or operate SendSets from a terminal or a script and a `sendsets` binary is available, with no dashboard. For instance recovery and accounts (database-level), use sendsets-ops instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take an agent-written app from repo to live production on the user's OWN accounts, with providers they choose (hosting, database, auth, payments, email, domain/DNS). The human connects accounts and approves changes; supported wiring operations run through a local CLI and produce verification evidence with explicit limits. Use when the user wants to ship, deploy, go live, launch, publish, or put their app online, or asks to wire up env vars, webhooks, auth settings (signup, email confirmation, password policy), a real signup → confirmation email → login journey, password recovery, account isolation between two users, auth redirects, email DNS or a custom domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end cold email outreach orchestration. Handles goal alignment, lead ingestion from any source (CSV, paste, CRM export, database), sequence design, email generation, campaign setup in the user's chosen outreach tool, and launch. Tool-agnostic — supports Smartlead (full MCP automation), Instantly, Lemlist, Apollo, or manual CSV export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track all identified/contacted people across strategies. CSV-backed contact database with dedup by LinkedIn URL or email. Prevents duplicate outreach when running strategies on a recurring cadence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a custom web dashboard (React + Vite + Express) inside your sandbox to visualize the agent's Turso database. The dashboard is served on port 3847 and the user sees it live in the "App" tab in Gooseworks. Use when the user asks for a dashboard, visualization, chart, metric view, or any custom UI powered by their agent's data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer a company's sales and marketing tech stack from public signals. Detects CRMs, cold email tools, people databases, ad pixels, email delivery services, and outbound sending domains via DNS records, website source inspection, Apify technology profiling, blacklist checks, and public spam complaint searches. Works on single companies or batches. Outputs a structured markdown report per company.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts Synapse workspaces to Fabric: Spark items, Lake Databases, Linked Services, and Dedicated SQL Pool schema/procedures for Lakehouse or Warehouse. During Pool-to-Lakehouse migration only, can migrate approved dependent procedure callers after notebook readiness. Excludes standalone pipelines and Warehouse administration. Triggers: Synapse workspace to Fabric, Dedicated SQL Pool to Lakehouse, Dedicated SQL Pool to Fabric Warehouse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。