3,329 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Find and fix issues from Sentry using MCP. Use when asked to fix Sentry errors, debug production issues, investigate exceptions, or resolve bugs reported in Sentry. Methodically analyzes stack traces, breadcrumbs, traces, and context to identify root causes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate self-contained HTML visualizations with Plannotator theming. Use for implementation plans, PR explainers, architecture diagrams, data tables, slide decks, and any visual explanation of technical concepts. Plans and PR explainers follow Plannotator's prescriptive approach; all other visual content delegates to nicobailon/visual-explainer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
把一个概念铸成杂志专题档案——真问题→失败→转折→顿悟→命名, 6 个 layout 模具 + 4 字族对比 + 探案档案细节
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manually distribute working-tree changes (or a batch of edits already made on the current branch) across the correct branches of a Graphite (gt) stack, when gt absorb's blame-based auto-split doesn't match the logical grouping - e.g. new code with no prior line to blame onto, or changes that conceptually belong with a commit gt's algorithm wouldn't pick. Use when asked to "split these changes into the stack", "absorb this properly", "put this fix on the right branch", or when a change was made on top of a branch but really belongs several branches down.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides YAML SDK development in Apache Beam, including environment setup, testing, and key concepts. Use when working with Beam YAML code in sdks/python/apache_beam/yaml/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, review, and edit developer documentation for SDKs, libraries, and frameworks, including sites such as ai-sdk.dev and chat-sdk.dev. Use for getting-started guides, tutorials, API references, conceptual explanations, integration guides, migration guides, troubleshooting, and code examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dashboard panel component pattern for aggregator/summary panels that accept pushed partial data updates via updateData(), defer rendering until first data arrives, and incrementally re-render metrics without re-fetching — ideal for panels that synthesize data already fetched by other panels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify delegated file-edit results directly in the target workspace before accepting success, and rerun with absolute paths if the delegate's report conflicts with reality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enrolls a project in OSS-Fuzz, Google's free continuous fuzzing service for open source, and drives it locally. Covers project.yaml, Dockerfile and build.sh setup, the helper scripts, reproducing OSS-Fuzz crash reports, and the acceptance criteria. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing for an open-source project, reproducing an OSS-Fuzz bug report, or testing an OSS-Fuzz build before submitting it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interprets Culture Index (CI) surveys, behavioral profiles, and personality assessment data. Supports individual profile interpretation, team composition analysis (gas/brake/glue), burnout detection, profile comparison, hiring profiles, manager coaching, interview transcript analysis for trait prediction, candidate debrief, onboarding planning, and conflict mediation. Accepts extracted JSON or PDF input via OpenCV extraction script. Use when the user shares a Culture Index PDF or JSON profile, asks what someone's CI traits mean, compares Culture Index profiles across a team or against a hiring profile, or asks about burnout risk from Survey-versus-Job gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides C++ code toward modern idioms (C++20/23/26). Use when writing new C++ code, modernizing legacy patterns, or working on security-critical C++. Replaces raw pointers with smart pointers, SFINAE with concepts, printf with std::print, error codes with std::expected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates security patches with reproducible baseline-versus-patched evidence, including original exploits, root-cause variants, behavior preservation, regressions, and newly introduced security failures. Use after a patch exists and before accepting, merging, or reporting it as fixed; also use when an AI-generated patch, remediation commit, pull request, or proposed upstream fix needs adversarial post-patch validation across any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phishing campaign execution methodology for authorized red team engagements. Covers end-to-end campaign lifecycle: infrastructure provisioning (GoPhish, SMTP relay configuration, domain acquisition and aging, SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment), payload delivery vectors (Office macro weaponization, HTA droppers, ISO/IMG container abuse, LNK shortcut hijacking, OneNote embedded payloads, HTML smuggling), email authentication bypass techniques (SPF softfail exploitation, DKIM replay attacks, display name spoofing, homoglyph and cousin domain registration), credential harvesting with MFA bypass (EvilGinx2 transparent proxy, Modlishka session relay, pixel-perfect HTML cloning), spear phishing pretext development informed by OSINT, email security gateway evasion, QR code phishing (quishing), and callback phishing for initial access. Integrates with GoPhish for campaign management, EvilGinx2 for adversary-in-the-middle credential interception, King Phisher for template design, and the Social Engineering Toolkit for payload generation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1566 (Phishing) and sub-techniques T1566.001 (Spearphishing Attachment), T1566.002 (Spearphishing Link), T1566.003 (Spearphishing via Service). Assumes you have written authorization and a defined scope before any campaign execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evil Twin / KARMA / Mana access point methodology — rogue AP construction with hostapd-mana / wifiphisher / airgeddon, KARMA universal probe response, Mana selective probe response, captive portal phishing, deauth-driven client coercion to attacker AP, MAC randomization defeat via PNL leak analysis, post-association MITM (DNS, ARP, transparent proxy), credential capture for portal/web/SMB, and detection-evasion tactics. Use to coerce client devices onto an attacker-controlled AP, intercept their traffic, harvest credentials, or deliver payloads via captive portal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch compact UKB-TOPMed PheWAS summaries for single variants by accepting rsID, GRCh37, or GRCh38 input and resolving to the required GRCh38 query. Use when a user wants concise UKB-TOPMed association results for one variant
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。