「find」の検索結果

Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Matches your study to appropriate journals based on topic, design, and evidence strength. Use when deciding where to submit a manuscript, comparing journal options by impact factor vs scope fit vs method tolerance, or finding a realistic submission target after a rejection. Also triggers on "where should I submit this paper", "which journal is best for my study", "find journals for my manuscript", "is this a good fit for [journal]", or "I need a journal with IF around X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search domains, compare prices, find promo codes, get purchase recommendations. Use when user wants to buy a domain, check domain prices, find domain deals, compare registrars, or search for .ai/.com domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SKILL.md files in repos", "research external skills", "find workflow patterns", "survey the skill landscape", "what skills exist out there", or wants to investigate public repositories for extractable processes, babysitter plugins, and reusable procedural insights. Searches GitHub for SKILL.md files, classifies repos by archetype, and maintains structured research under docs/reference-repos/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go and find the reels that are actually working right now in the user's niche, rank them by how far each beat its own account, name the hook formula each one used, and turn that into a swipe file they can shoot from. Use when the user says "find viral videos", "what's working right now", "what are people posting in my niche", "reverse engineer this account", "build me a swipe file", "why is this reel doing numbers", or asks what to make next and has no evidence to answer with.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", or "test this app" on mobile. Produces a structured report with reproducible evidence: screenshots, optional repro videos, and detailed steps for every issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps a project's to-do list and memory in GitHub issues — files each finding (from a review, an audit, or the user) as its own issue without duplicates, lists the open issues that bear on the current work, and closes an issue with a comment recording what was wrong, what was tried, what worked, and how it was fixed. Use when review findings or a list of problems should become tracked work (a paper's misleading claims, a codebase's bugs, improvements for later), when starting or resuming work and deciding what to do next, or when a fix has landed and its issue should be closed with a record. Needs the GitHub CLI; warns before posting to a public repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what is actually working in the user's niche on YouTube and rank it by how far each video beat its own channel, then name the formula. Use for "what's working right now", "find viral videos in my niche", "why did this blow up", competitor research, or a swipe file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add AI navigation in Unity 6.3 LTS: bake a NavMesh with the AI Navigation package (NavMeshSurface), move agents with NavMeshAgent.SetDestination, and handle dynamic obstacles. Use when setting up pathfinding, making an enemy chase the player, baking navigation, or when the user mentions NavMesh, NavMeshAgent, NavMeshSurface, NavMeshObstacle, or Unity pathfinding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design NPC and enemy decision-making with finite state machines, behavior trees, steering behaviors, and A* pathfinding — engine-neutral algorithms that pair with the detected engine's navigation API. Use when building enemy AI, an FSM or behavior tree, steering/flocking, or pathfinding, or when the user mentions state machine, behavior tree, blackboard, A*, navmesh, seek, or patrol/chase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /debug to find and fix a bug's root cause: a test failing for an unclear reason, /check verify finding a failure, or behavior being wrong. Runs a reproduce, localize, hypothesize, test, fix, verify loop, makes the minimal fix, and hands a regression test to /test. No features, no extra refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds Skills in configured local repositories before searching CCPM. Use when discovering or reusing a Skill, finding PDF/code-review tools, inspecting a Skill, listing installed/popular/recent Skills, or installing/updating/removing Claude Code Skills/plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two scopes: (1) drives Kimi.app via computer-use for Work/Agent data-plugin queries (天眼查、同花顺 iFinD、SEC、IMF etc.) and Chat's built-in 深度研究 report; (2) kimi-cu macOS desktop-automation playbook — AX set_value / keyboard / click channel selection, foregrounding, AX-tree recovery, form & dialog recipes. Use for "用 Kimi 查" / "操作 Kimi 客户端" / "Kimi 插件" / "Kimi 深度研究" / driving any macOS desktop app (Electron/webview/native) via kimi-cu. Not for kimi.com browser automation (use kimi-webbridge) or direct iFinD API access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding and accessing AI/LLM model brand icons from lobe-icons library. Use when users need icon URLs, want to download brand logos for AI models/providers/applications (Claude, GPT, Gemini, etc.), or request icons in SVG/PNG/WEBP formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate the acquirer's diligence team hunting for reasons to cut your price — their internal red-flags memo with a price-chip estimate per finding. Use when asked to red-team my company before a sale, how will an acquirer attack our valuation, pre-diligence audit, or what will DD find. Produces the acquirer's internal memo (revenue quality, key-person, tech debt, concentration, legal) and a debrief on which flags are fixable before a process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search LCSC Electronics for electronic components — find parts by LCSC number (Cxxxxx) or MPN, check stock/pricing, download datasheets, analyze specifications. Sister company to JLCPCB, same parts library. Sync and maintain a local datasheets directory for a KiCad project, or use batch MPN-list seeding (`--mpn-list`) for bulk workflows without a project. No API key needed — uses the free jlcsearch community API. Use this skill when the user mentions LCSC, JLCPCB parts library, JLCPCB assembly parts, production sourcing, Cxxxxx part numbers, needs to find LCSC equivalents for parts, is preparing a BOM for JLCPCB assembly, or wants to download datasheets and LCSC is available. For package cross-reference tables and BOM workflow, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search B2B contacts with Apollo.io: find people by title and company, enrich contacts and companies. Trigger phrases: apollo, find prospects, enrich contact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect missing authentication and broken function-level authorization vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (map endpoints and the role/permission system), batched verify (check auth/authz in parallel subagents, 3 endpoints each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers unauthenticated access and vertical privilege escalation (e.g., regular user accessing admin-only functions). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/missingauth-results.md. Use when asked to find missing auth, broken access control, or privilege escalation bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。