1,680 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate complete JSON-LD schema markup for blog posts including BlogPosting, Person, Organization, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, and ImageObject. Validates against Google requirements and warns about deprecated types. Use when user says "schema", "blog schema", "json-ld", "structured data", "schema markup", "generate schema".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a fully structured SEO content **outline** (not a finished brief) and exports it as a formatted .docx Word document. The output is a skeleton for a writer to fill in — section headings, topic prompts, angles — not pre-written paragraphs. Use this skill whenever a user provides a blog title, focus keyword, domain URL, or any combination of those and asks to generate an outline, brief, blog brief, SEO brief, article structure, or content plan. Also trigger when the user says "create a brief for X", "generate an outline for [topic]", "make a content brief", "I need a brief for [URL or keyword]", or pastes a title and asks what the structure should look like. This skill handles input validation, domain analysis, keyword enrichment, audience inference, archetype-aware section selection, and full .docx generation — always use it rather than writing ad-hoc outlines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate audio narration of blog posts using Google Gemini TTS. Supports summary narration, full article read-aloud, and two-speaker podcast/dialogue mode with 30 voice options. Outputs MP3 with HTML5 audio embed code. Works standalone via /blog audio or internally from blog-write. Falls back gracefully when API key is not configured. Use when user says "blog audio", "narrate blog", "audio version", "text to speech", "tts", "podcast mode", "read aloud", "audio narration", "voice", "narration", "generate audio".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Counts and compares blog posts across a target and competitors, audits content freshness via sitemap lastmod dates, and maps competitor organic keywords (US, non-branded, informational) against the target to surface ranking gaps. Use when asked to compare blog counts, content volume, publishing cadence, content freshness, keyword mapping, keyword gap analysis, or competitor keyword reports — e.g. "how many blog posts does X have vs Y", "how fresh is content on X", "where does [target] rank for [competitor] keywords", "keyword gap between X and Y". Works from company names alone. Always use for blog comparison, freshness audits, and keyword mapping tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Spawns parallel subagents for comprehensive analysis. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish durable brand and voice context for cross-skill consumption. Generates BRAND.md (audience, positioning, do/don't editorial rules, taboo phrases, competitor differentiation) and VOICE.md (existing persona JSON re-expressed as readable prose), both written to the project root. When present, all blog sub-skills auto-load these files before writing or reviewing. Pairs with blog-persona, which manages the structured persona JSON. Use when user says "blog brand", "create brand context", "brand voice doc", "BRAND.md", "VOICE.md", "establish editorial brand", "brand guidelines for blog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate detailed content briefs for blog posts with target keywords, content outlines, competitive analysis, recommended statistics, image and chart suggestions, word count targets, internal linking architecture, template recommendations (12 types), TL;DR drafts, citation capsule planning, information gain prompts, and multi-channel distribution plans. Briefs are optimized for Google rankings and AI citations (GEO/AEO). Use when user says "content brief", "blog brief", "write brief", "outline blog", "plan blog post", "blog outline", "content outline".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate editorial calendars for blogs with topic clusters, publishing schedules, content decay detection, freshness update plans, seasonal opportunities, content mix formula, template integration, and distribution scheduling. Plans monthly or quarterly calendars optimized for SEO topic authority and AI citation freshness requirements (30-day update cycles). Use when user says "editorial calendar", "content calendar", "blog calendar", "publishing schedule", "blog plan", "content plan", "what should I write".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any API documentation site by crawling every endpoint page and scoring each one across 5 checks: description quality, OpenAPI spec presence, body param descriptions, response codes, and response schema completeness. Produces a polished interactive HTML report with a summary scorecard, site-wide pattern analysis, ranked top issues, and per-endpoint findings with specific fix guidance. Trigger this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, or check their API docs. Also trigger for: "do the same audit for X", "audit docs.company.com", "check the API docs at X", "run the API docs audit on X", "review the docs for Y API", or pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. Always use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl-score-report workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetration testing a running system, not for infrastructure-only scanning, and not for fixing what it finds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the engineering and research philosophies of Jeff Dean, Chief Scientist at Google DeepMind and Google Research. Reach for this skill whenever you are designing large-scale distributed systems, optimizing latency and energy efficiency, or making architectural decisions about machine learning infrastructure. It should trigger automatically for topics involving hardware-ML co-design, model distillation, sparse activation, massively multi-task models, or scaling systems by 5x to 10x. Use this skill to evaluate system bottlenecks, transition from specialized to unified models, and optimize experimental velocity. Apply his mental models to avoid premature 100x scaling and to treat AI models as reasoning engines rather than memorization databases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing a codebase, or refactoring. Covers TypeScript, Node.js, infrastructure-as-code, and full-stack web apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured planning mode for AI agents working on coding and development tasks. Produces a comprehensive plan BEFORE any code is written or changed, including task decomposition, architecture decisions, risk assessment, and approval gates. Use this skill whenever the user says "/plan", "plan mode", "plan first", "think before coding", "make a plan", or asks the agent to plan before executing. Also trigger when the user describes a complex multi-step development task and would clearly benefit from structured planning before implementation — especially for tasks involving new features, refactors, migrations, infrastructure changes, or multi-file edits. When in doubt, plan. A few minutes of planning prevents hours of rework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS activate when the user's query involves Docker in any way — even if it also matches other skills. If the words docker, Dockerfile, docker-compose, compose.yml, container, or image appear in the query, this skill MUST be used. Covers: writing or editing Dockerfiles and compose files, adding services (postgres, redis, etc.) to compose, volume mounts and data persistence, docker build failures (layer caching, npm install issues), healthchecks and service startup ordering (depends_on), environment variables in containers, port mapping, container crashes and exit codes (OOM/137), non-root users, multi-stage builds, image optimization, .dockerignore, and deploying to container runtimes. Takes priority over general implementation or debugging skills when Docker infrastructure is the subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for any Python backend work in this project: building FastAPI endpoints, writing service functions, defining Pydantic/SQLModel schemas, running Alembic migrations, or debugging 422 errors. Essential for authentication and authorization patterns — setting up get_current_user, is_superuser checks, admin-only guards, role-based access, and dependency injection chains like Depends(). Also covers middleware, background tasks, async SQLAlchemy sessions, ORM relationship loading, and request/response design. Activate whenever the question involves Python API code, FastAPI patterns, or backend architecture in this codebase. Not for frontend, Docker, CI/CD, or infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for ANY work involving React, Next.js, TypeScript, or Tailwind in the browser layer. This includes building components and pages, but equally covers debugging and fixing frontend issues: CSS/Tailwind classes not applying, form validation behavior, hydration mismatches between server and client renders, styling bugs, layout shifts, and rendering problems. Also use for refactoring components (e.g., splitting Server vs Client Components), data fetching patterns, state management, bundle optimization, and frontend tooling. If the problem involves what users see or interact with in a web browser — whether building, fixing, or refactoring — use this skill. Not for backend APIs, databases, infrastructure, or DevOps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infrastructure and development cost estimation for technical projects. Use when planning budgets, evaluating build vs buy decisions, or projecting TCO for architecture choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend technology stacks based on project requirements, team expertise, and constraints. Use when selecting frameworks, languages, databases, and infrastructure for new projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase C of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: implement platform and infrastructure adapters for dependencies discovered in Phase A/B, such as persistence, process execution, dialogs, notifications, or environment capabilities. Use only in an explicit migration when such dependencies leak into Forms/core or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not invent adapters for capabilities the product does not have, and do not implement main-window XAML.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。