Hunt Missing/Weak Rate Limiting — login brute force, OTP/2FA brute force (10^6 keyspace), password-reset-token brute, credential stuffing, username/email enumeration via error-string / status-code / timing differences, weak password policy, missing CAPTCHA (CAPTCHA token replay / single-use / concurrency-window bypass specifics → hunt-captcha-bypass), IP-based rate-limit bypass via X-Forwarded-For and friends, ReDoS. Distinguishes hard lockout vs soft IP-throttle vs CAPTCHA-injection vs silent shadow-throttling (avoids false-negative 'no rate limit' conclusions). Medium to Critical depending on what the brute reaches (OTP→ATO = Critical).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
You are helping a penetration tester exploit writable Group Policy Objects
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Kubernetes cluster attack techniques covering the full attack lifecycle from initial foothold in a pod to cluster-wide compromise. Covers service account token theft and impersonation, RBAC misconfiguration exploitation including wildcard permissions and privilege escalation via role binding, direct etcd access for secret extraction, kubelet API abuse on port 10250 and read-only port 10255, pod escape via hostPID hostNetwork and hostPath volume mounts, Kubernetes secrets enumeration and decoding, admission controller bypass techniques, network policy bypass and lateral movement, cloud metadata service access from pods for credential theft on AWS EKS GCP GKE and Azure AKS, CRD and operator abuse for persistence, and node compromise via DaemonSet deployment. Tools include kubectl, kube-hunter, peirates, kubeaudit, kdigger, kubeletctl. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1609 Container Administration Command, T1610 Deploy Container, T1613 Container and Resource Discovery. Use this skill when assessing Kubernetes clusters,...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
別駭我!基本安全檢測 — Security self-check for Clawdbot/Moltbot. Run a quick audit of your clawdbot.json to catch dangerous misconfigurations — exposed gateway, missing auth, open DM policy, weak tokens, loose file permissions. Auto-fix included. Invoke: "run a security check" or "幫我做安全檢查".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack☆ 22026年2月1日 更新
Plans migrations from Zscaler ZIA/ZPA, Palo Alto, legacy VPN, SWG, or SASE stacks to Cloudflare One. Use for migration assessments, policy mapping, rollout plans, and parity/gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Design an agent's handling of obligations, prohibitions, permissions, and conflicts among norms and goals. Use when an autonomous agent must decide which norms apply and what to do when they conflict. NOT for simple fixed policy checks, ordinary BDI commitment design, or organizational metaphor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新