「test」の検索結果

Generate test assertions from existing code implementation. Use when the user has implementation code without tests or incomplete test coverage, and needs assertions synthesized by analyzing the code's behavior, inputs, outputs, and state changes. Supports Python (pytest/unittest), Java (JUnit/AssertJ), and JavaScript/TypeScript (Jest/Chai). Handles equality checks, collections, exceptions, and state verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP API testing for TypeScript (Supertest) and Python (httpx, pytest). Test REST APIs, GraphQL, request/response validation, authentication, and error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, track, and act on QA metrics: test coverage percentage, flakiness rate, defect escape rate, MTTR, test execution time trends, automation ROI, quality gates, and SLAs for test suites. Includes metric formulas, realistic targets by company stage, and the action to take when each metric goes red. Use when: "QA metrics," "test metrics," "quality KPIs," "test health," "flakiness rate," "defect escape rate." Not for: building the dashboard UI (Allure/Grafana) — use qa-dashboard; measuring coverage gaps and mutation score — use coverage-analysis. Related: qa-dashboard, coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, release-readiness, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze escaped defects and test suite health through blameless postmortems. Covers bug pattern analysis, test suite health reviews, 5 Whys root cause analysis, process improvement cycles, and postmortem/retro meeting templates with action item tracking. Use when: "QA retro," "escaped bugs," "postmortem," "quality incident," "defect analysis," "improvement cycle." Not for: live release go/no-go decisions — use release-readiness. Not for ongoing metric dashboards — use qa-metrics. Not for reviewing existing test code quality — use ai-qa-review. Related: qa-metrics, test-reliability, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and improve test coverage meaningfully. Covers Istanbul/V8/coverage.py configuration, coverage gap analysis by risk, coverage-as-ratchet in CI (never let it decrease), PR coverage diff checks, mutation testing for assertion quality, and distinguishing meaningful from vanity coverage. Use when: "code coverage," "coverage gap," "Istanbul," "coverage threshold," "coverage report," "branch coverage." Not for: writing the tests that raise coverage — use unit-testing; coverage as a tracked KPI trend over time — use qa-metrics. Related: unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Simulink Test Sequence blocks and harnesses from EARS requirements. Use when asked to create a test case from a requirement, generate tests from a .slreqx file, or verify a Simulink model with requirement-based tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement features and fix bugs test-first, the Canon TDD way (test list → one test → make it pass → refactor → repeat). Use when implementing any new feature, endpoint, model, or method, fixing a bug, or executing a plan — write the test list and a failing test BEFORE production code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the TMDb integration tests against the live TMDb API (the Integration test plan; requires TMDB_API_KEY/USERNAME/PASSWORD). Use before a PR, or after model/fixture changes, to validate against real API responses — delegates to the tooling-runner agent (Haiku) and returns counts + failures, distinguishing genuine failures from transient live-API/env issues. For mocked unit tests, use /test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for DeepEval, the open-source framework for unit testing LLM applications. Helps developers write test cases, define custom metrics, and integrate LLM quality checks into CI/CD pipelines using a pytest-like interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chromatic is a visual testing service from the Storybook team that snapshots every story in a cloud browser and shows visual diffs for review on each pull request. Use when the user wants visual regression testing with Storybook, or mentions "chromatic," "visual regression," "Storybook testing," "UI review," "visual diff," or "component snapshot testing." For general screenshot comparison, see percy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test web application security with Burp Suite. Use when a user asks to intercept HTTP traffic, test for web vulnerabilities, fuzz API endpoints, analyze authentication flows, or perform manual web application pentesting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test REST and GraphQL API endpoints with structured assertions and reporting. Use when a user asks to test an API, hit an endpoint, check if an API works, validate a response, debug an API call, test authentication flows, or verify API contracts. Supports GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE with headers, body, auth, and response validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The intersection of AI generation and performance marketing. This skill covers creating ad creatives at scale using AI tools—from static images to video ads to dynamic creative optimization—while maintaining the conversion focus that performance marketing demands. Traditional creative testing is slow: create 5 variants, wait weeks for data, iterate. AI-powered ad creative is fast: generate 50 variants in an hour, test simultaneously, learn in days, iterate continuously. The constraint is no longer production capacity—it's testing velocity and creative strategy. This skill bridges AI generation capability with advertising effectiveness, ensuring that AI-created ads don't just look good—they convert. Use when "AI ads, ad creative, performance creative, ad generation, creative testing, ad variants, DCO, dynamic creative, Meta ads, Google ads, ad fatigue, conversion creative, advertising, performance-marketing, creative-testing, ai-ads, conversion, paid-media, scale" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Penetration Testing workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWT — AI-Powered E2E Testing (Beta) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-powered E2E web testing — eyes and hands for AI coding tools. Declarative YAML scenarios, Playwright execution, visual matching (OpenCV + OCR), platform auto-detection (Flutter/React/Vue), learning DB. Install: npx skills add ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt -g and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Security Testing Workflow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs API security testing workflow for REST and GraphQL APIs covering authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and security best practices and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A/B Test Setup workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a long swarm of hundreds to thousands of cheap headless coding workers that drive a large failing-test backlog to green. Failures are clustered by signature, each worker fixes one cluster in its own git worktree, a serial no-regression merge gate lands the fixes, the loop resumes across restarts for hours, and it federates across sibling sessions over git branches when one container's CPU is not enough. Use for "fix these thousands of failing tests with a Haiku swarm", "drive the test suite to green with hundreds of agents", "build this compiler or interpreter against a conformance suite", "launch, relaunch or check in on the swarm loop", "the swarm is stuck, idle or rejecting everything", "parallel agents fixing tests keep hitting merge conflicts and regressions", "add sibling containers to the swarm", or "compare models on the tail the swarm could not fix". Ships the harness, a per-project TOML config, a fake-worker selftest, check-in signals and the 2026-10-12 haiku-cc failure catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为 iOS 项目配置 fastlane + GitHub Actions，实现推送 main 分支自动构建并上传 TestFlight。参考实现：Cathier 项目。触发词：「testflight」「fastlane」「自动构建」「CI TestFlight」「/wjs-publishing-testflight」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for Rust testing in Axone CosmWasm contracts. Use when adding unit tests, integration tests, data-driven cases, or coverage-oriented test scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。