1,169 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use quando o usuário quiser configurar o pwdev-github — 'configurar github', 'setup do github project', 'init github' — verificando gh, autenticação e o scope project e gravando repo e Project padrão em .planning/github.json. Não use para criar um Project (github-project).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement real-time features using Convex reactive queries that automatically update when data changes, enabling live collaboration, instant updates, and reactive UIs without manual polling. Use when building live dashboards, implementing collaborative editing, creating chat applications, showing real-time notifications, building activity feeds, implementing presence indicators, creating reactive search, or any feature requiring instant data synchronization across clients.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants browser-based end-to-end tests for an Adobe App Builder application. Covers Playwright E2E testing for ExC Shell SPAs, AEM extension UIs, and full-stack flows. Use when the user mentions: "E2E test", "end-to-end test", "Playwright", "browser test", "test my SPA in the browser", "test my AEM extension", "test the full flow", "integration test with UI", "headless browser test", "E2E in CI". This skill is for BROWSER-based testing only. For Jest unit tests of actions or React components, use appbuilder-testing instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Obtains a valid Adobe IMS access token for the DA (Document Authoring) API. Use this skill as a prerequisite step whenever another skill needs to call admin.da.live — for example, before pushing HTML content, listing documents, or triggering a DA preview. Do NOT use this skill if you already have a valid DA_TOKEN in scope from a previous step in the same session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test and debug browser UIs using Chrome DevTools MCP — DOM inspection, console errors, network requests, performance traces, and visual verification. Load when building or debugging anything that renders in a browser, verifying a UI fix, profiling Core Web Vitals in a real page, or the user asks for browser testing with DevTools. Requires chrome-devtools MCP configured. Not for backend-only or CLI work. Pairs with frontend-design and performance-optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for building modern Android UIs with Jetpack Compose, covering state management, navigation, performance, and Material Design 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orders and orients assembled contigs into chromosome-scale scaffolds from long-range linking data, inserting N-gap spacers (adds no sequence). Covers Hi-C/Omni-C scaffolding (YaHS, SALSA2, 3D-DNA/Juicer), Hi-C read-mapping prerequisites (map each end separately, no mate rescue, dedup, enzyme-aware), reading the contact map for misjoins/inversions/false-duplications, manual curation in Juicebox/PretextView (the VGP/DToL standard), reference-guided scaffolding (RagTag) and its karyotype-erasure hazard, genetic-map (ALLMAPS) and Bionano optical-map integration, chimera-breaking before scaffolding, gap-filling, and telomere/contig-vs-scaffold-N50 QC (tidk). Use when turning contigs into chromosomes with Hi-C, integrating a linkage map or optical map, choosing a scaffolder by available linking data, or judging whether a chromosome-scale assembly is trustworthy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects focal chromatin loops (point interactions / corner-dots) in balanced Hi-C and Micro-C contact maps and aggregates/validates a loop set. Covers de-novo calling with cooltools dots (HiCCUPS-style 4-background local enrichment with lambda-chunked FDR), chromosight (template-correlation), and Mustache (scale-space blob detection); aggregate peak analysis (APA) via cooltools pileup for confirmation; the depth/resolution prerequisite (de-novo needs ~5-10kb resolution = hundreds of millions to billions of valid pairs); consensus across callers and convergent-CTCF support as validation; and differential loops via union anchors plus chromosight quantify. Use when calling chromatin loops or dots from a cooler, deciding whether a map is deep enough to call de-novo vs running APA on known CTCF/cohesin anchors, building an aggregate peak pileup, comparing loops across conditions, or validating loop calls. For HiChIP/PLAC-seq/PCHi-C protein-anchored data use FitHiChIP/MAPS, not dots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nominates and assesses CRISPR off-target sites genome-wide. Enumerates candidate sites by mismatch and bulge tolerance with Cas-OFFinder/CRISPRitz, ranks them with the published CFD score (SpCas9-only, relative ranker) or MIT/CRISTA/energy models, runs variant-aware screening against gnomAD/individual genomes (CRISPRme), and frames the empirical genome-wide discovery assays (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq, CHANGE-seq, DISCOVER-seq, Digenome-seq) and high-fidelity nuclease choice (HiFi Cas9, Sniper-Cas9, eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1). Use when assessing guide RNA specificity, choosing among candidate guides, screening a therapeutic guide against population variation, or planning empirical off-target validation. Distinguishes predicted vs detected vs validated. On-target activity scoring and deaminase (Cas-independent) base/prime-editor off-targets are separate skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control for flow, spectral, and mass cytometry - time-based anomaly cleaning (flowAI, flowCut, PeacoQC, flowClean), margin/boundary event removal, signal-drift detection, dead-cell exclusion, CyTOF Gaussian/DNA/event-length checks, instrument calibration/standardization (MESF, CS&T, peak-2), and batch-level outlier flagging. Use when assessing acquisition quality, choosing a cleaning tool, ordering QC relative to compensation, deciding margin removal before density-based steps, or flagging problematic samples before clustering or differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests genotype-environment associations and identifies adaptive loci while correcting for the four-confound landscape (structure, demography, background selection, sampling design) using LFMM2 with mandatory K via sNMF cross-entropy elbow (LEA 3), BayPass Core/AUX/C2/IS with Omega covariance matrix, RDA / pRDA for polygenic adaptation (Forester 2018; requires imputed genotypes), OutFLANK with trimmed FST null, pcadapt, gradient forests (Ellis-Smith-Pitcher 2012, NOT mis-cited Ellis-Manel), Capblancq & Forester 2021 RDA Swiss-army-knife, genomic-offset prediction with Lind & Lotterhos 2025 three-regime caveat, Lotterhos-Whitlock sampling optima, Wang & Bradburd 2014 IBD vs IBE, and Circuitscape + ResistanceGA. Use when identifying adaptive loci across gradients, choosing K for LFMM2, deciding among GEA methods, predicting maladaptation with the novel-environment caveat, distinguishing IBD vs IBE, or optimizing sampling design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses genetic health of populations for conservation with Ne estimation across time horizons (LDNe NeEstimator V2 option-file API + SNeP physical-linkage correction; recent trajectory via GONE/GONE2; deep history via Stairway Plot 2 / dadi / fastsimcoal2 / PSMC), F-statistics, runs of homozygosity binned by length class to date inbreeding, genetic-load decomposition (Bertorelle 2022 realized vs masked), the modern 100/1000 Ne rule (Frankham 2014), Ne/Nc 2-6 orders of magnitude in marine fish (Hauser & Carvalho 2008), tree-sequence forward simulations (SLiM 4 + pyslim + tskit), and the Sukumaran-Knowles caveat against MSC methods for management-unit definition. Use when estimating Ne by time horizon, detecting inbreeding via F_ROH, decomposing genetic load, justifying conservation thresholds, distinguishing ESU/MU/DPS, configuring NeEstimator V2, or correcting LDNe physical linkage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects acquired antimicrobial-resistance determinants and chromosomal point-mutation resistance in bacterial assemblies using AMRFinderPlus, ResFinder 4.0 (acquired + PointFinder), CARD-RGI, abritAMR, staramr, and species-specific callers (TB-Profiler, Mykrobe). Harmonises cross-tool output via hAMRonization, contextualises determinants with mobile-genetic-element annotation (MOB-suite, PlasmidFinder, MobileElementFinder, ICEberg), predicts phenotype against EUCAST or CLSI breakpoints, and translates calls into WHO GLASS reporting categories. Use when screening clinical or surveillance isolates for AMR, distinguishing acquired vs intrinsic vs point-mutation resistance, calling rpoB / katG / pncA / gyrA / mgrB mutations, reconciling AMRFinderPlus vs RGI vs ResFinder disagreement, contextualising carbapenemases or mcr alleles on plasmids, predicting susceptibility from genotype against the WHO Mtb 2nd-edition catalogue, or building a hAMRonized multi-lab AMR surveillance pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Corrects fluorophore spillover (conventional compensation) or spectral overlap (spectral unmixing) and applies variance-stabilizing transforms (logicle/biexponential, arcsinh, log) for flow and mass cytometry. Covers spillover-matrix estimation from single-stain controls, AutoSpill, the spillover spreading matrix and why panel design (not compensation) bounds resolution, compensate-then-transform ordering, and arcsinh cofactor choice (5 for CyTOF, ~150 for fluorescence, per-channel via flowVS). Use when correcting spectral overlap, preparing data for gating/clustering, choosing logicle vs arcsinh, deciding a cofactor, or distinguishing compensation from spectral unmixing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query and download from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and EMBL-EBI's BioStudies/ArrayExpress mirror. Use when finding expression datasets, navigating SuperSeries vs SubSeries, choosing between series-matrix (submitter-normalized) and raw supplementary files, downloading via GEOparse (Python) or GEOquery (R/Bioconductor), linking GEO to SRA for raw reads, or distinguishing GSE/GSM/GPL/GDS record types. Encodes the SuperSeries trap, the series-matrix normalization-trust caveat, GEOmetadb deprecation, ArrayExpress migration to BioStudies, and processed-vs-raw decision matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad events, running GISTIC2, or extracting copy-number mutational signatures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。