1,278 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental behavioral evaluator. Drives a running artifact via browser/curl/CLI and records rubric evidence; the runner is not yet a fully implemented automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Jira ticket complexity + inconsistencies via the jira-evaluator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'evaluate KEY', 'analyze ticket complexity for KEY', 'check ticket quality for KEY'. NOT for estimation (mk:jira-estimator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. Use AFTER a plan exists. For validating the idea itself before planning, use /mk:office-hours first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental behavioral evaluator. Drives a running artifact via browser/curl/CLI and records rubric evidence; the runner is not yet a fully implemented automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantitative agent evaluation using 4-metric framework (correctness/step_ratio/tool_call_ratio/latency_ratio) with ideal trajectory annotation and capability-categorical taxonomy. Use when measuring agent efficiency, comparing agent variants, or gating new agents through correctness→efficiency phases. Complements harness-eval (SE benchmarks) and evaluator-optimizer (qualitative rubric).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured SE task evaluation using 15 benchmark definitions from claude-code-harness research
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a declared local review evaluation can support fair quality claims. Use only when the user explicitly asks to audit review-eval validity or use the bundled synthetic fixture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge subskill for simmer. Scores a candidate artifact against user-defined criteria on a 1-10 scale and produces ASI (highest-leverage direction) for the next generator round. Supports judge-only, runnable evaluator, and hybrid evaluation modes. Do not invoke directly — dispatched as a subagent by the simmer orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Setup subskill for simmer. Inspects the artifact or workspace, infers evaluation contracts and search space, proposes a complete assessment to the user, and produces a setup brief after confirmation. Conversational, not form-based — the agent does the work of understanding the problem, then presents what it found. Do not invoke directly — called by simmer orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Causal inference with treatment/control groups over time. Use when user mentions: treatment effects, policy evaluation, pre/post comparison, parallel trends, DID, DiD, difference in differences, natural experiment, quasi-experimental.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Italian geographic and property data through Openapi - geocoding/reverse geocoding, zip codes (CAP), municipalities/provinces/regions with ISTAT codes, Italian cadastre (catasto) property and owner lookups, visure catastali/ipotecarie, real estate valuations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates end-to-end interview preparation for senior ML/AI engineers targeting Anthropic and peer companies. Use for prep timeline generation, story coherence across rounds, mock scheduling, and debrief analysis. Activate on "interview prep", "interview loop", "Anthropic interview", "prep timeline". NOT for resume writing, career narratives, or individual round-type practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and orchestrates a realistic interview simulation platform with voice AI, whiteboard evaluation, gaze-tracking proctoring, and mobile spaced repetition. Use for building mock interview infrastructure, configuring sessions, and adaptive difficulty. Activate on "interview simulator", "mock interview", "practice session", "voice mock". NOT for individual round-type coaching, resume writing, or prep timeline coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark multi-agent coordination systems with experiment design, power analysis, human rating protocols, bootstrap confidence intervals, and reproducible reporting. Use for salvage latency, recovery fidelity, coordination overhead, and protocol comparison studies. NOT for ML model benchmarking, web-product A/B testing, survey design, or general-purpose data science.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build publication-quality figures in R with ggplot2 using the grammar of graphics (data + aesthetics + geometries + scales + facets + themes) with CVD-safe palettes, cairo_pdf TrueType embedding, programmatic aes via tidy evaluation, and the theme_classic publication baseline. Use when producing static figures in R for papers, presentations, or reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill determines whether testicular volume should be used as the primary or sole indicator of sexual development in male childhood cancer survivors who have received gonadotoxic treatments such as alkylating agents or testicular radiotherapy. Triggers include clinician questions like “Can I use testicular volume to assess puberty in this male survivor after chemotherapy?” or “Is testis size reliable for sexual maturity evaluation post‑radiation?”
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。