「verify」の検索結果

Set up Talivia revenue-first website analytics with MCP, then verify live traffic and revenue attribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master skill — set up the full agent harness for any repo so an agent can work it reliably: legible (map-not-manual docs + custom lints), executable (one-command dev stack), verifiable (e2e gate + a verify-before-ship loop), plus commit hygiene and entropy control. Use when onboarding a new/unfamiliar codebase to agent-driven development — "set up the harness", "make this repo agent-ready", "harness this codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or auditing the related-work section of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — covering the multimedia literature spread across vision, audio/speech, language, HCI/QoE, and systems, handling arXiv-speed concurrency, keeping citations double-blind, and verifying that cited "ACM MM papers" are ACM MM and not ICMR, MMSys, CVPR, or TOMM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or verifying the institutional / accounting-standard / regulatory background for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — getting standard clauses, regulatory rules, and effective dates exactly right, since precise institutional detail is a defining bar of this journal. Use before measurement and identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — checking footnote (当页下注) conventions, the 著者—出版年制 reference style, abstract/keyword limits, article length, the online-only submission system via the Accounting Society of China site, double-blind anonymity, and document hygiene. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿指南.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stress-testing the LOGIC of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) theory manuscript — checking logical coherence, running thought experiments and counterfactuals, addressing alternative explanations and disconfirming cases, and verifying each proposition follows from its argument. This is ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT data analysis; AMR publishes no datasets, no statistics, and no empirical results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply approved Xcode build optimization changes following best practices, then re-benchmark to verify improvement. Use when a developer has an approved optimization plan from xcode-build-orchestrator, wants to apply specific build fixes, needs help implementing build setting changes, script phase guards, source-level compilation fixes, or SPM restructuring that was recommended by an analysis skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify phone numbers using SMS one-time codes via the Didit API. Use when you need to confirm a user owns a phone number, implement SMS-based 2FA, or validate phone during signup/onboarding flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build email campaigns - find emails, verify them, and prepare outreach

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email finder and verifier - find emails, verify deliverability, discover companies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replace an existing video's opening with a supplied clip or free kinetic text hook while retaining and verifying every original body frame, audio, captions and ending. Use for surgical hook tests rather than regenerating the complete ad.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove a language switch translates what the user sees, keeps what they had already typed, and is still in force after a reload. Use when i18n, a locale picker, a language menu or translation files were added or changed, when a string is suspected of staying in the old language or showing a raw translation key, or when a user reports losing their form or their language choice after switching or refreshing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove a UI that updates before the server answers puts things back and says so when the request fails, and keeps the change when it succeeds. Use when a like, toggle, rename, reorder, delete or add-to-cart updates instantly, when an optimistic update was added or changed, or when a user reports a change that "saved" but was gone after a reload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a change to a web app actually works in the running app before calling it done. Drives the real page and returns a pass/fail verdict with the request that fired, the state that moved, and the file:line to fix. Use after editing a component, a form, a route, or an API call; when you have said "fixed" but have not opened the app; when the user asks "does it actually work?"; or when a change looks right on screen and you cannot prove it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Force the states a happy-path run never reaches (a failing API, an empty list, a slow request, a timeout, an expired session, a toast that auto-dismisses) and check the UI actually handles them. Use when error handling was written but never run, when a loading or empty state needs verifying, when a bug only happens on a slow connection, or when a timer, poll, debounce or retry needs testing without sleeping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a user journey you just clicked through into a saved regression check that re-runs deterministically, with no model in the loop and no test code to write. Use when you have driven the same flow twice, when the user wants regression coverage without a Playwright suite, when a refactor needs proving against every existing journey, or when re-verifying by hand is costing a full drive every time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove sign-in lands the user where they should be, sign-out really ends the session so a protected page sends them back to sign in, and an expired session asks to sign in again instead of breaking. Use when auth, a login form, a logout button, route guards or token refresh were added or changed, or when a user reports being logged out, or not logged out, unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install, instrument and verify this running web app from the inside (DOM, network, routing, console and framework state) instead of screenshots or guessing. Drives one real flow end to end and returns a verdict with the file:line to fix. Use when the user asks to set up or install Reticle, when a user-facing change needs proving before you call it done, when a test passes but the UI is broken, or when the user types /reticle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a form actually rejects bad input: the error message renders, the submit button stays disabled, and no request goes out. Use when validation logic was written but never driven, when a "required" or pattern check looks right on screen but was never proven, or when a bug report says the form submitted invalid data anyway.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove the next page of a list, or the next batch of an infinite scroll, loads NEW rows from the server, repeats none, and that the end of the list is handled. Use when pagination or infinite scroll was added or changed, when a list shows the same rows twice or skips some, or when the last page still offers a next control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove that a command-line tool actually did what it said, instead of trusting its exit code and its output. Snapshots the filesystem before and after, names the expected consequence in advance, and returns one of four verdicts with what could not be seen. Use after running a build, a migration, a scaffolder, a formatter, a codegen step, or an AI coding CLI; when a command printed success and you are about to report "done"; when you are about to write "exit code 0, so it worked"; or when a tool claims it edited files. Needs nothing installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。