「go」の検索結果

Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns plain-language requests (emails, chat messages, form submissions, meeting asks, voicemail or call notes) into one intake record per request (what is asked, who asks and for whom, urgency as evidenced, category, suggested owner, missing information with draft clarifying questions) and a triage table sorted for the operations lead to act on. Use when the user asks to "log these requests", "triage this pile of asks", "turn this message into an intake record", "who should own this request", "what is missing before we can start" or "build today's intake list". Do not use for customer support tickets, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for clearing a personal mailbox by reply bucket, use inbox-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers an employee's or manager's HR policy question strictly from the policy documents the user supplies or the agent can reach as knowledge: a DRAFT answer that quotes the governing clause with its document, version and clause reference, lists the conditions and exceptions the text states, returns UNKNOWN where the documents are silent and names the role to ask. Never invents a rule, fills a gap from general practice or decides an individual's case. Use when the user asks to check a policy, for example "what does the policy say about", "am I entitled to", "how many days of leave do I get", "what is the process for requesting", "does the handbook allow" or "which clause covers". Do not use for comparing two policy versions or briefing a change, use policy-change-briefing instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT board paper skeleton from the sponsor's inputs: purpose, recommendation as the sponsor states it, options including do nothing, risks, financials exactly as provided, authority to decide and the decision sought, with every claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so the sponsor sees what still needs support. Use when the user asks to "draft a board paper", "structure the committee paper", "prepare the decision paper for the investment committee", "skeleton the board memo" or "what goes in the paper for the audit committee". Do not use for a pre-read or briefing pack with no resolution sought, use executive-briefing-pack instead; to record a decision already taken in a discussion, use decision-memo-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, pricing plan, go-to-market plan or forecast in character as a Chief Revenue Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to exact passages, revenue risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CRO review", "pressure-test the revenue plan", "what would sales leadership say about this" or "challenge this forecast". Do not use for partnership, deal-structure or market-positioning reviews, use cbo-reviewer instead; for the finance seat use cfo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for deducting business meals at 50%, required documentation (who, what, where, why), entertainment at 0% since TCJA 2018, on-premises meals going to 0% in 2026, and common mistakes. Trigger on "deduct a meal", "business lunch", "client dinner deductible", "meals deduction", "entertainment deduction", "can I write off this dinner".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repeatable month-end close checklist for small businesses — lock the period, process outstanding receipts, categorize remaining items, reconcile all accounts, review large transactions, check contractor 1099 thresholds, generate monthly P&L summary. Trigger on "close the month", "month-end close", "monthly bookkeeping", "close the books".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize user-scoped CLEC episodes into traceable Traditional Chinese Obsidian pages. Use when Codex must group X, pCloud, Google Drive, Bilibili, Odysee, and RSS or Podcast sources by five-digit episode number; obtain and review transcripts through media-transcript; clean readable transcripts with the confirmed CLEC lexicon; anonymize students; or build the standard three-layer episode page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and execute specialized skills from a curated marketplace catalog on GitHub, fetched on-demand and run ephemerally (no permanent installation). The catalog covers a broad and growing range — document generation (PDF/Word/Excel/PowerPoint), visual design, presentations, web app testing, animated GIFs, dev tooling (MCP scaffolding, frontend components), creative outputs (algorithmic art), technical documentation lookup (library/API/framework references), and more. Consult this skill whenever the user asks for a capability that could plausibly be covered by a community skill — the catalog is the source of truth, not this description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-first web search via Exa — semantic/neural ranking, category-scoped results, fresh content retrieval, and one-shot answer synthesis with citations. Use when the user needs current web information better ranked than general web search, or a grounded answer with sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch up-to-date library, framework, and SDK documentation via Context7's search and docs endpoints. Use when the user asks about a library/API (React, Next.js, Prisma, Supabase, Tailwind, Django, Vue, etc.) and you need current docs, not Claude's training-time knowledge. Skip this skill for generic programming questions that don't require library-specific docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FastAPI service setup: app/main.py, API routers, pydantic-settings, lifespan/app.state services, middleware, health checks, pytest/TestClient, Uvicorn, Gunicorn/uvicorn-worker, Docker/Compose. Use for scaffolding or modernizing Python API services; skip for Flask/Django-only, frontend-only, non-Python APIs, or Supabase-specific work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern C++ project setup: CMake/CMakePresets, vcpkg, Ninja, VS Code/clangd, GoogleTest, clang-format/tidy, Doxygen, CI, macOS/Linux/Windows. Use for bootstrapping or modernizing host-side C++ apps and libraries; prefer embedded-project-setup for MCU firmware and cross-debug flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior engineer CLI expertise for AI agents — workflows, safety guardrails, gotchas, and anti-patterns across cloud, IaC, containers, databases, dev tools, and platforms

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start, inspect, or continue a persistent SIPS self-improvement loop. Use when the user asks for /selfloop, wants the agent to iteratively improve itself, or wants a goal dedicated only to SIPS and agent capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-mainline governance for deployless repositories. Use after a deployless audit when a repo needs trunk-based branch rules, branch protection, contribution guidance, review gates, merge queue policy, AI PR intake rules, or agent-ready mainline practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continuous production path for deployless repositories. Use after mainline governance and release controls exist, when a repo needs CI/CD changes to automatically deploy, publish, or promote artifacts from main across any language, runtime, or hosting platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deployless delivery-model audit. Use first when adapting any repository toward single-mainline development, automatic deployment from main, runtime release controls, production-trace-driven iteration, AI PR governance, or multi-agent delivery workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a web project needs business goals, audience, information architecture, conversion priorities, content hierarchy, constraints, or design CTQs clarified before visual design begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standard operating procedure for an auditable, headless MIKE+ workflow via the mike-plus MCP server — how to plan, copy, run, QA-gate, compare, plot, audit, and safely stop. Use FIRST whenever an agent is handed a MIKE+ model (.sqlite) or result (.res1d) plus a plain-language goal; it picks the operating mode and tells the agent which mike-* skill to open next and in what order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。