「claim」の検索結果

Write a short, fact-checked reply that answers a colleague's question in one meaning only, ready to copy and paste. The input is their pasted message. Check the claims against the code first, use the project glossary terms, and print only the reply in chat. Read-only — no writes to code, the issue tracker, GitHub, chat or any MCP. Use on "/cortex-communication:answer-buzzkill", "help me answer", "reply to this question", or when the user pastes a colleague's question and asks for an answer in the same manner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

View, create, cancel, bid, and claim Aavegotchi GBM auctions on Base mainnet (8453). Subgraph-first discovery (Goldsky), with onchain verification + execution via Foundry cast. Safety-first: DRY_RUN defaults to 1 (simulate with cast call; only broadcast with cast send when DRY_RUN=0 and explicitly instructed).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and complete paid tasks on the 0xWork decentralized marketplace (Base chain, USDC escrow). Use when: the agent wants to earn money/USDC by doing work, discover available tasks, claim a bounty, submit deliverables, check earnings or wallet balance, or set up as a 0xWork worker. Task categories: Writing, Research, Social, Creative, Code, Data. NOT for: posting tasks (use the website), managing the 0xWork platform, or frontend development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent-native payments via 1ly MCP. Use when the user needs x402 payment handling, to accept USDC for APIs/services, to pay for paid APIs, to create stores or paid links, need payment gateway for agents or to run agent-to-agent paid workflows. Supports Solana and Base. Capabilities include accepting USDC, marketplace search, paid API calls with auto-payment, store/link creation, stats, key management, and token launch, trade and fee-claim on Bags.fm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch meme tokens, trade Solana assets, and claim creator fees on 4chad.xyz - the autonomous AI agent trading platform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Linear issues ready for an AI agent to pick up. Equivalent of `bd ready` for Linear workflows. Use when starting a session to find claimable work, or when asked "what's next" or "find work".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts USMCA/NAFTA Certificates of Origin for preferential tariff treatment on US-Mexico-Canada goods. Verifies origin criteria, HS classifications, and regional value content. Use when preparing trade certificates, customs origin documentation, duty preference claims, or cross-border shipment certifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation format and verification protocol for legal documents that draw on Bates-stamped source records. Defines the bracket citation format, multi-source citation rules, quotation handling, the verification pass that runs before output, and the [UNVERIFIED] flag protocol. Use this skill any time another skill produces a legal work product that cites Bates-stamped pages, including medical chronologies, deposition summaries, demand letters, case briefs, and discovery responses. Also use any time the user asks how to format a citation or verify that a claim is supported by the source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a U.S. state-court complaint to establish the true boundary line between adjoining properties, with optional trespass/encroachment claims. Trigger when a user needs to initiate litigation over conflicting property descriptions, ambiguous deed language, or unauthorized encroachments by an adjoining landowner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a U.S. at-will employment offer letter with unambiguous at-will language, FLSA-compliant compensation terms, benefits disclaimers, and conditions precedent. Use when extending formal job offers, issuing written employment offers, or drafting offer letters for new hires in U.S. jurisdictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces litigation-grade case summaries for animal law disputes including cruelty/neglect prosecutions, ownership/custody, dangerous animal designations, veterinary malpractice, and service/assistance animal accommodations. Builds exhibit-cited factual timelines, maps evidence to statutory elements, evaluates expert evidence, and assesses remedies with jurisdiction-specific legal research. Use when summarizing animal law cases, analyzing animal cruelty charges, pet custody disputes, dangerous dog hearings, veterinary malpractice claims, or assistance animal accommodation matters. Also trigger for animal forfeiture, bite liability, wildlife possession, or animal-related court filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. civil litigation Answers with paragraph-by-paragraph admissions/denials, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim triage. Trigger when user needs a responsive pleading to a complaint, mentions affirmative defenses, admit/deny responses, Rule 8, or insufficient knowledge responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a defendant employer's Answer to a workplace harassment complaint. Responds paragraph-by-paragraph to allegations, asserts Faragher-Ellerth and other affirmative defenses, and follows federal/state civil procedure rules. Use when defending employers at the pleadings phase against Title VII, state FEHA, or other employment harassment claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a defendant's Answer with Invalidity Contentions responding to a U.S. patent infringement complaint. Covers FRCP 8(b) admissions/denials, affirmative defenses, and PLR 3-3 invalidity contentions with claim charts under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, 112. Use when representing a defendant in the pleadings phase of federal patent litigation who must respond to an infringement suit and assert prior art, anticipation, obviousness, or § 112 defenses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a read-only App Store-readiness preflight for a declared iOS target without claiming approval or submitting anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a declared local review evaluation can support fair quality claims. Use only when the user explicitly asks to audit review-eval validity or use the bundled synthetic fixture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies game theory to multi-agent coordination protocols with advisory claims, repeated interactions, daemon-mediated correlation, and deviation penalties. Use for Nash equilibrium checks, folk-theorem cooperation analysis, correlated-equilibrium routing, and price-of-anarchy audits in strategic agent systems. NOT for consumer pricing, card-game strategy, or general microeconomics outside agent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。