Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,743 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list with a shape verdict, fixes on approval. Use for "review this PR", "/pr-review 3011", or a pre-flight self-review before submitting; add "thorough" for adversarial verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to run a holistic regrounding pass on the entire microsoft/apm documentation corpus against current source code, page-by-page, and emit surgical fixes for stale claims. Activate when the maintainer wants a WHOLE-CORPUS audit (not per-PR review) -- typical triggers include "audit the docs", "reground the corpus", "check every page against code", "pre-release docs sweep", "the docs have drifted everywhere", or "we just reshaped the TOC, find dead links". Wave-batched and S7-verified; scales to the full ~112-page corpus in ~10 minutes wall-time. This is a SIBLING to docs-sync, not a replacement: docs-sync is per-PR (triggered by a diff); this skill is per-corpus (triggered by a maintainer ask). They share agent personas, schemas, and the docs index, but their triggers MUST NOT collide. Does NOT auto-merge, does NOT push without maintainer review, and does NOT replace per-PR drift detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to classify the documentation impact of a pull request diff, returning one of three verdicts -- no-change, in-place edit, or structural change -- with bounded LLM cost. Activate as a sibling skill of docs-sync; the orchestrator calls this first, before any panel spawn, to keep cost floor at 1 LLM call when no docs work is needed. Reads .apm/docs-index.yml as the corpus map; never reads the full corpus.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to triage ONE microsoft/apm pull request already selected by autopilot-pr-triage-scheduler. Covers community PRs that fix an issue and PRs opened without an issue. Return one advisory recommendation, never human approval, never a diff review, never merge. Not a queue manager and not autopilot-pr-review-worker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to cut an APM release from the current worktree: assess whether the cycle since the last tag warrants a patch or minor bump (semver discipline against the merged-since-last-tag diff), sanitize the [Unreleased] CHANGELOG block into a dated version block with one concise "so what" entry per merged PR (drop internal-only churn, consolidate duplicates), bump pyproject.toml + uv.lock, run the CI-mirror lint chain, and open the release PR. Activate on "ship a release", "cut v0.x", "release prep", "bump and PR", "open release PR", "what kind of release do we need", or any phrasing that ends in opening a release PR -- even when the user does not say "skill". Stops BEFORE tagging; tagging stays a human gate that triggers the release workflow. Refuses to bump to a major (>= 1.0.0) version without explicit operator confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to verify CLAIM-LEVEL grounding of a documentation page (or set of pages) against the source code. Activate when you have specific pages to check for factual accuracy -- not when sweeping a whole corpus (use docs-corpus-audit for that) and not when triaging a PR diff (use docs-sync for that). Trigger nouns: "is this doc accurate", "verify the page against the code", "fact-check this section", "any claims that drifted from source", "fact-checking", "grounding audit", "drift hunt", "claim verification". Returns per-claim verdicts (GROUNDED | PARTIAL | CONTRADICTED | UNSUPPORTED) with file:line evidence citations. Catches paragraph-level inaccuracies that page-level audit averages over -- e.g. a paragraph with 5 claims where 4 are grounded and 1 is fabricated. Does NOT modify files (returns advisory only); does NOT re-architect the docs; does NOT triage PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an explicitly identified Marin pull request as a whole change, asking whether it fits repository patterns, whether a better abstraction exists, and what breaks outside the diff; use for large or agent-authored PRs, after or alongside review-pr.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deslop, simplify, or review low-value tests and prose only when explicitly requested for a branch or diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a read-only preview for a specified Marin infra/pulumi stack and trace each pending resource change to merged pull requests since its latest successful update when that update records a clean Git checkout. Use when a stack has unapplied changes or drift and someone needs to know which PRs explain the preview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, analyze, and prioritize keywords for SEO and GEO content strategies from a seed keyword or niche. Identifies high-value opportunities based on search volume, competition, intent, and business relevance. Generates topic clusters. For building a dated editorial calendar from your own Search Console data, use `content-planner` instead — this skill is seed-driven keyword discovery, not calendar scheduling. Use when asked to "find keywords", "keyword research", "keyword analysis", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "content ideas from a seed", or any keyword discovery task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or update authored English SDK documentation within a requested topic or diff using implementation evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate changesets in openai-agents-js using LLM judgment against git diffs (including uncommitted local changes). Use when packages/ or .changeset/ are modified, or when verifying PR changeset compliance and bump level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover deleted commits from GitHub using REST API, web interface, and git fetch. Use when you have commit SHAs and need to retrieve actual commit content, diffs, or patches. Includes techniques for accessing "deleted" commits that remain on GitHub servers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review tutti git diffs for project structure, layering, module ownership, and duplicate event-center infrastructure by planning focused architecture review tasks, then having the main agent orchestrate sub-agents for only the changed areas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered adversarial UI testing via the browse CLI. Analyzes git diffs to test only what changed, or explores the full app to find bugs. Tests functional correctness, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX heuristics. Use when the user asks to test UI changes, QA a pull request, audit accessibility, or run exploratory testing. Supports local browser (localhost) and remote Browserbase (deployed sites).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal, public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks). Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix, (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing", "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us", "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class computer vision skill for image/video processing, object detection, segmentation, and visual AI systems. Expertise in PyTorch, OpenCV, YOLO, SAM, diffusion models, and vision transformers. Includes 3D vision, video analysis, real-time processing, and production deployment. Use when building vision AI systems, implementing object detection, training custom vision models, or optimizing inference pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Differential gene expression analysis (Python DESeq2). Identify DE genes from bulk RNA-seq counts, Wald tests, FDR correction, volcano/MA plots, for RNA-seq analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MATLAB and GNU Octave numerical computing for matrix operations, data analysis, visualization, and scientific computing. Use when writing MATLAB/Octave scripts for linear algebra, signal processing, image processing, differential equations, optimization, statistics, or creating scientific visualizations. Also use when the user needs help with MATLAB syntax, functions, or wants to convert between MATLAB and Python code. Scripts can be executed with MATLAB or the open-source GNU Octave interpreter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。