「eac」の検索結果

Cyber threat intelligence and OSINT analysis toolkit. Runs structured investigations and delivers analyst-grade intelligence products with sourced, trust-scored findings. Use for OSINT and CTI cases, digital-footprint and exposure review, domain/subdomain/DNS/certificate recon, web-infrastructure pivoting (favicon hashes, tracker IDs, TLS certs, phishing-kit fingerprinting, campaign clustering), username/email/phone enumeration, breach and infostealer-log triage, image forensics, geolocation, crypto-wallet and IBAN/bank-account tracing, darknet search, M365/Azure and SaaS tenant recon, China/Sinophone recon (ICP filings, PRC corporate registries, Baidu/FOFA/Quake/ZoomEye), vulnerability and ransomware lookup, threat modeling, PII redaction, and structured reporting. Commands include /case, /sweep, /query, /webpivot, /username, /phone, /email-deep, /breach-deep, /icp, /cn-corp, /iban, /stealer-log, /exposure, /threat-model, /report, /brief, /redact, /apikeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach a skill or concept at the user's current level, optionally preserving a lightweight multi-session learning record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OTA updates with CodePush, EAS Build, and release configurations. Use when configuring OTA updates, EAS Build, or managing release configs for React Native.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve iOS and Android differences using Platform API and native modules in React Native. Use when platform branching or native-module integration is the primary task; defer cross-platform feature implementation such as push notifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement reactive state with Combine, Observation framework, and UDF patterns. Use when implementing state management with Combine, @Observable, or reactive patterns in iOS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build typed reactive forms with strict FormGroup typing, custom validators, and nonNullable controls in Angular. Use when implementing typed reactive forms, custom validators, or form control patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a tutorial module plan exists but each module still needs a verifiable teaching loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits .NET test mock usage by tracing each mock setup through the production code's execution path to find dead, unreachable, redundant, or replaceable mocks. Use when the user asks to audit mock usage, find unused or unnecessary mock setups, check if mocks are needed, reduce mock duplication or over-mocking, simplify test setup, or review whether mock configurations like ILogger/IOptions should use real implementations instead. Supports Moq, NSubstitute, and FakeItEasy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Share state between components that don't have a direct parent-child parameter relationship, using cascading values, scoped services with change events, or CascadingValueSource via DI. USE WHEN the user needs a CascadingParameter or CascadingValue that works across render mode boundaries, a shopping cart or notification count accessible from multiple pages, a theme or user preference cascaded app-wide, or when components in different parts of the tree must react when shared data changes. Also USE WHEN cascading values aren't reaching interactive children in per-page interactivity mode, or when the user needs to understand scoped vs singleton service lifetime for state on Blazor Server. DO NOT USE for direct parent-child parameter passing or EventCallback (see author-component), for persisting state across prerender-to-interactive transitions (see support-prerendering), or for service abstractions for data fetching in Auto/WebAssembly (see fetch-and-send-data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

.NET MAUI app lifecycle guidance — the four app states, cross-platform Window lifecycle events (Created, Activated, Deactivated, Stopped, Resumed, Destroying), platform-specific lifecycle mapping, backgrounding and resume behavior, and state-preservation patterns. USE FOR: "app lifecycle", "window lifecycle events", "save state on background", "resume app", "OnStopped", "OnResumed", "backgrounding", "deactivated event", "ConfigureLifecycleEvents", "platform lifecycle hooks". DO NOT USE FOR: navigation events (use maui-shell-navigation), dependency injection setup (use maui-dependency-injection), platform API invocation (use conditional compilation and partial classes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks about 藏传佛教, 噶举派, 大手印, phyag chen, 拙火, tummo, 那洛六法, 苦行, 闭关, 道歌, mgur, 米拉日巴, 玛尔巴, 上师瑜伽, 出离, 暇满, 中阴, 气脉明点, 觉受, nyams, 本觉, rig pa, or wants teaching in 米拉日巴尊者 Milarepa's voice. Triggers include "米拉日巴"、"密勒日巴"、"Milarepa"、"道歌"、"十万歌集"、"大手印"、"拙火"、"那洛六法"、"玛尔巴"、"噶举"、"白教"、"山洞修行"、"苦行"、"上师瑜伽"、"中阴"、"明空" — invoke whenever user's question touches Tibetan Kagyu / Mahāmudrā / yogi practice or asks about Milarepa's life and teachings, even without explicit request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ONLY when the user says they do not know which master or which teaching mode to use — 不知道问谁, 该找哪位祖师, 该用哪个模式, 有哪些法师, which master should I ask, help me choose. This is a router, not a teacher: it names a destination and stops. If the user asks an actual doctrinal or practice question, do NOT invoke this — let the matching master skill answer directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Micronaut applications — @acceptance scenarios, @MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Micronaut acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut; Map Gherkin scenario facts to Micronaut acceptance tests; Stub external HTTP services in Micronaut acceptance tests; Configure Failsafe acceptance test naming for Micronaut. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Quarkus applications — including @acceptance scenarios, @QuarkusTest, BaseAcceptanceTest with QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager for Testcontainers and WireMock, REST Assured for full HTTP pipeline testing, WireMock JSON mapping files (classpath:wiremock/mappings/), *AT suffix naming, and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Quarkus acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Quarkus; Create WireMock JSON mapping files for external HTTP stubs in Quarkus acceptance tests; Configure Maven *AT naming convention and Failsafe plugin for Quarkus acceptance tests; Map sanitized Gherkin scenario facts to Quarkus acceptance tests. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay skill — the DECISION + WIRING layer for LM observability that the single-backend skills [[langsmith]], [[phoenix]], [[mlflow]] do NOT cover. Each of those installs one backend; none of them help you DECIDE which backend fits your stack/scale/budget, nor give you a one-line autolog that turns it on fast. Use when starting any LM project, before the first deploy, or the moment someone asks "why did it do that?" and there are no traces to answer with. The skill picks a backend by stack (LangSmith for LangChain/LangGraph; Phoenix for OSS/local OpenTelemetry; MLflow for ML-shops already on MLflow; Langfuse for self-host), wires one-line autolog, verifies traces land, and adds eval hooks — instrumenting BEFORE you need it. Cross-links the first-debug-move skill [[agentsop-prompt-history-inspect]]. Do NOT activate to re-teach a backend you already chose (defer to its own skill), or for non-LM ML experiment tracking with no LLM calls (that is plain MLflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and audit privacy controls in product and infrastructure — GDPR, CCPA / CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA. Covers data minimization, lawful basis, consent management, data subject access requests (DSARs — access, deletion, portability), data processing agreements, DPIA / TIA, breach notification timing, data classification, and the technical implementation of 'right to be forgotten' across backups, caches, analytics, and third parties. Use when the user mentions 'GDPR,' 'CCPA,' 'CPRA,' 'data privacy,' 'privacy engineering,' 'data subject access request,' 'DSAR,' 'right to deletion,' 'right to be forgotten,' 'data portability,' 'consent management,' 'cookie consent,' 'data minimization,' 'DPIA,' 'data protection impact assessment,' 'breach notification,' 'BAA,' 'DPA,' 'data processing agreement,' 'sub-processor,' 'cross-border data transfer,' 'SCCs,' or needs to implement or review privacy controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific CVE or vulnerability disclosure end-to-end — what version is affected, is your code reachable, is there a public PoC, is there a patch, what's the exposure window, what's the mitigation if you can't patch immediately. Use when the user mentions 'CVE,' 'vulnerability research,' 'is this CVE relevant,' 'zero-day,' 'CISA KEV,' 'GitHub Security Advisory,' 'reachability analysis,' 'patch analysis,' 'exploit availability,' 'EPSS,' 'CVSS,' or 'should we drop everything and patch this.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, scope, and execute an authorized red-team engagement — distinct from a penetration test. Covers engagement methodology, assumed-breach scenarios, ATT&CK emulation plans, rules of engagement, deconfliction with the blue team, post-engagement debriefs, and the program-level work that makes red teams actually improve defenses. Use when the user mentions 'red team,' 'red team engagement,' 'red teaming,' 'adversary emulation,' 'ATT&CK emulation,' 'assumed breach,' 'purple team exercise,' 'tabletop with technical execution,' 'red team scope,' 'rules of engagement,' 'red team RoE,' 'deconfliction,' 'red team debrief,' or wants to design or run a red-team engagement against systems with authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。