「improve」の検索結果

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds eval.yaml evaluation specs for skills, custom agents, and redistributable gh-aw workflow packages in the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating skill or workflow-package tests, writing evaluation stimuli, defining graders and rubrics, sizing an eval for statistical power, or setting up test fixture files. Handles the Vally eval.yaml schema, fixture organization, and overfitting avoidance. Do not use for running or debugging existing evals (use improve-skill-quality) nor for skills authoring (use create-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds new agent skills for the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating a new skill, generating SKILL.md files, writing a skill description that the runtime will actually route to, or setting up skill directory structures. Handles frontmatter generation, section templates, and validation guidance. Do not use for fixing a skill that already fails its evaluation (use improve-skill-quality) or for writing eval.yaml (use create-skill-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE when asked to fix, rewrite, update, improve, modernize, show corrected code for, or explain existing MSTest tests or MSTest-specific configuration. Use for "review" when corrected code or edits are wanted, even for one pasted assertion or passing tests with bad failure output. Covers expected/actual labels; generic Boolean, collection, string, numeric, null, identity, exception, hard-cast, and object[] checks; TestContext/lifecycle; timeout/cancellation; OS/CI conditions, retry, cleanup, parallelization, MSTest.Sdk project setup, and MSTESTxxxx. Honor the installed MSTest version. DO NOT USE to design new test cases (code-testing), perform report-only audits, create project files rather than explain MSTest setup, run tests, migrate frameworks, or handle non-MSTest/non-.NET code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-analysis learning and process improvement. Use when completing major analysis projects, documenting lessons learned, or improving team analytical practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System hardening, detection engineering, security baseline monitoring, patch management, defense-in-depth architecture, and security posture improvement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

扫描代码库寻找深化机会，以可视化的 HTML 报告呈现，然后对你选中的方案进行盘问。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize code performance through iterative improvements (max 2 rounds). Benchmark execution time and memory usage, compare against baseline implementations, and generate detailed optimization reports. Supports C++, Python, Java, Rust, and other languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent self-evolution system. Collects signals from user feedback, stores execution trajectories (golden + correction pairs), analyzes patterns, proposes mutations to workspace files, and generates HTML reports. Trigger with "/evolve" or when the user asks to improve agent behavior. Also use when the user says "remember this pattern", "don't do X again", or "that was a good approach, save it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate customer-impacting OpenAI Ruby SDK defects and privately handled security risks, then dispatch at most five evidenced, independent fixes to isolated project worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-process LaTeX project prose to improve readability through varied sentence and paragraph lengths. Removes filler phrases and unnecessary transitions while preserving all citations and semantic meaning. Use after drafting is complete, when sections read as monotonous or blocky.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, reviews, and improves Swift Testing code using modern APIs and best practices. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing projects that use Swift Testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize title tags, meta descriptions, Open Graph, and Twitter cards for maximum click-through rate. Generates multiple A/B test variations with character counting and SERP preview. Use when asked to "optimize title tag", "write meta description", "improve CTR", "Open Graph tags", "fix my meta tags", "social media preview", "my click rate is low", "title optimization", or any meta tag task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate genuinely beautiful, on-brand UI instead of generic "AI slop" — use whenever the user asks to build, design, style, or improve a UI, landing page, dashboard, app screen, or component, whenever a PRD/spec needs a design pass before implementation, whenever the user pastes reference images/Pinterest/Dribbble links and wants the app to look like them, or whenever the user complains the AI-generated UI looks generic, boring, cookie-cutter, or "like every other AI app." Make sure to trigger this even if the user doesn't say "design" explicitly — phrases like "make this look good", "build the frontend for X", "this looks like every other SaaS site", or "match this vibe" all qualify. Also triggers on two verbs, "study"/"extract the look of" a reference screenshot or URL, and "audit"/"review"/"why does this look AI-generated" for critiquing existing UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to write or improve integration tests for Micronaut — @MicronautTest, HttpClient, TestPropertyProvider with Testcontainers, transactional test mode where appropriate, and Maven Surefire/Failsafe splits for *Test, *Tests, *IT, and *AT. This should trigger for requests such as Add Micronaut integration tests with Testcontainers; Wire dynamic datasource or broker URLs for @MicronautTest; Write @MicronautTest integration tests with Testcontainers; Configure replacement beans for Micronaut integration tests; Review Micronaut integration test lifecycle and resources. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic SQL guidance — schema naming, relational table design, query readability, indexes, transactions, database security, migrations, testing, and monitoring — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review SQL schema or migrations; Improve SQL query performance and readability; Design relational tables and indexes; Review database transaction, security, or monitoring practices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design or review WireMock stubs (JSON mappings or Java DSL); Improve request matching, isolation, or reset strategy for HTTP mocks; Add or fix verification of outbound HTTP calls to a WireMock server; Debug flaky tests involving WireMock or unmatched request journals. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Hexagonal architecture guidance for Java projects - ports and adapters boundaries, application core independence, driving and driven adapters, dependency direction, infrastructure leakage detection, optional architecture tests, and evidence-backed remediation. This should trigger for requests such as Review Hexagonal architecture; Review ports and adapters boundaries; Enforce dependency direction; Add ArchUnit architecture tests; Detect infrastructure leakage in domain code; Improve ports and adapters boundaries. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Docker and container image guidance for Java projects - Dockerfile design, multi-stage Maven builds, jlink custom runtimes, micro runtime distributions such as Alpaquita, JVM container ergonomics, non-root execution, image metadata, .dockerignore, reproducible builds, vulnerability scanning, SBOM awareness, and production-safe container defaults. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java Dockerfile; Improve Docker image security; Add jlink runtime to a Java container; Add containerization to a Java project; Optimize Java container image size; Review Docker build reproducibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic MongoDB and non-relational database query guidance — document schema design, collection modeling, JSON Schema validation, indexes, aggregation pipelines, query performance, consistency trade-offs, transactions, and operational safety — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design MongoDB document schemas; Review MongoDB queries and indexes; Improve aggregation pipeline performance; Model non-relational data access patterns; Review NoSQL consistency and transaction trade-offs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。