「orr」の検索結果

How to actually instrument product analytics correctly. Event taxonomy, property design, naming conventions, schema versioning, identity stitching, funnel design, retention cohorts, North Star metric selection, dashboard hygiene, instrumentation debt, and the failure modes that produce data nobody trusts. Triggers on product analytics setup, event taxonomy, tracking plan, instrumentation, schema versioning, North Star metric, retention cohorts, funnel design, naming conventions, instrument new feature, audit existing analytics, dashboard reconciliation, instrumentation debt, Mixpanel setup, Amplitude setup, PostHog setup, warehouse-native analytics. Also triggers when the team has data but cannot trust it, or when designing instrumentation for a new feature, or when auditing an existing setup that has drifted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a backlink profile using Ahrefs MCP data: profile health, anchor text distribution, toxic link identification, lost link reclamation, and gap analysis against competitors. Use this skill when reviewing backlink health, scoping a disavow project, recovering from a manual action, planning link building, or doing M&A due diligence on a property's link equity. Triggers on backlink audit, link profile, toxic links, disavow, anchor text analysis, lost links, link reclamation, referring domains, link gap. Also triggers when traffic decline correlates with link loss or when an unnatural link warning appears in Search Console.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial "perfection" review — hold a change to an *ideal* bar, not just a correct one, assuming eternal time, unlimited energy, and no ship pressure. Use when the user asks to review "for perfection", to make a defect "impossible to express", or to hunt where a defect "relocates" across review rounds. Grounds every claim in the diff, fans out adversarial verifiers via Workflow, and reports residual surfaces with a structural fix for each. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly asks for a perfection / ideal-bar review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a failure, regression or incorrect result in an integration or application, even before it can be reproduced. Use for diagnosis and repair; follow incident authority for live mitigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) advisor for the automotive supply chain — the ENX/VDA assessment regime that OEMs like VW, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz require from suppliers and service providers. Covers the VDA ISA 6 catalogue (current through 2026) and the ISA2027 transition (published July 1, 2026; mandatory for assessments ordered from January 1, 2027), assessment levels AL1/AL2/AL3, all 12 assessment objectives/labels (Confidential, Strictly Confidential, High/Very High Availability, Proto Parts/Vehicles, Test Vehicles, Proto Events, Data, Special Data), maturity scoring (0–5, target 3, cutback rules), the ENX portal process, scoping, audit-provider selection, corrective action plans and the 9-month window, 3-year label validity, and ISO 27001 mapping. Use for any TISAX, VDA ISA, ENX, automotive information-security assessment, prototype protection, or OEM supplier-security requirement question — gap assessments, label selection, readiness, and audit prep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-ship documentation sync. Updates README, ARCHITECTURE, CONTRIBUTING, CHANGELOG, TODOS, VERSION. Auto-applies factual corrections, asks for risky rewrites. CHANGELOG voice polish. Cross-doc consistency checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System health check that verifies agent operations are running correctly

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit skill configurations for correctness and freshness

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent 此地无银三百两式 residue: finalize artifacts without echoing rejected session-only alternatives into labels, metadata, commits, PRs, or handoffs. Use after corrections or discarded proposals. Not for ordinary deletion, deprecation, migration, or exclusions materially required for safety, accuracy, compatibility, audit, quotation, or requested comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates code that deploys fine-tuned models from SageMaker Serverless Model Customization to SageMaker endpoints or Bedrock. Use when the user says "deploy my model", "create an endpoint", "make it available", or asks about deployment options. Identifies the correct deployment pathway (Nova vs OSS), generates deployment code, and handles endpoint configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computer vision engineering for object detection, segmentation, and visual AI, covering CNN and Vision Transformer architectures and ONNX/TensorRT deployment. Use when building detection pipelines, training models, or optimizing inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for AI agents that learn from their own execution, detect failure modes, and improve autonomously. Use when building agents that get better over time, managing auto- memory, or designing self-correcting feedback loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applied statistics for business and product questions — test selection, assumption checks, power planning, effect sizes with intervals, multiplicity correction. Use when interpreting an experiment, sizing a study, or vetting a claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, and review Terraform provider documentation for Terraform Registry using HashiCorp-recommended patterns, tfplugindocs templates, and schema descriptions. Use when adding or changing provider configuration, resources, data sources, ephemeral resources, list resources, functions, actions, or guides; when validating generated docs; and when troubleshooting missing or incorrect Registry documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate the brand profile is production-ready: fields, compliance, connectors. "is the brand setup correct"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show autopilot status: health, auto-corrections, guardrails, escalations. "what did the autopilot change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or fixing .claude/rules/ files - provides correct paths frontmatter (not globs), glob patterns, and avoids Cursor-specific fields like alwaysApply

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages (.tar.gz/.zip). Covers 10 disciplines: cs, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, environmental_science, mathematics, social_sciences. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, critique, or assess a research paper, check references, or verify a BibTeX file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Fable 5.1 — the top of the escalation ladder and the strongest staged run available. Routes the task to the @fable-orchestrator agent with its model overridden to Fable (`model: "fable"`), which stages the work, delegates artifact production to @fable-worker-sonnet / @fable-worker-haiku, and cold-checks deliverables with @fable-verifier. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on the strongest model ("fable on fable", "stage this on fable", "deep work mode, fable", "run this on 5.1"), or when a fable-opus run reports the task exceeds Opus's ceiling. Benchmarked 2026-09-02: zero correctness delta on Fable 5.1 at ~1.1× tokens, ~2× wall — a provenance runner, not an accuracy runner. Do NOT use for ordinary single-pass tasks — prefer fable-opus, fable-sonnet, or fable-haiku when the task doesn't need peak reasoning. Fable is plan-included; bulk work still routes down-tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade web scraping with automatic anti-bot bypass, structured JSON parsing for 40+ targets, and geo-targeting. Use when the user needs to scrape web pages, extract product data, get search results, or collect structured data from supported e-commerce and search platforms without worrying about getting blocked and when geo targeting is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL TRANSLATION — translating contracts, statutes, case law, and legal correspondence across languages, including Arabic/MENA. Vendor-neutral routing triangulated from mid-2026 evidence (WMT25 human eval, SwiLTra-Bench legal-MT, multilingual-reasoning proxies, ArabLegalEval). There is NO clean legal-translation leaderboard, so this vertical is directional and treats human legal-linguist review as mandatory. Asks up to 4 quick questions (language pair, cost, speed, privacy/certification), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to translate this contract/statute", "best AI for legal translation", "translate this legal doc to/from Arabic", or is about to machine-translate legal text without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。