「oss」の検索結果

intake 全 JSON を統合したいとき、intake.md と intake.json を Jinja2 で render して quality_gate と cross_check を通したいときに使う。

HTML-first persistent planning skill. Generates a single self-contained plan.html with interactive phases, drag-and-drop tickets, sliders, mockups, and embedded JSON state. Survives /clear via session catchup, tamper-protected by SHA-256, mirrors across 17 IDEs, ships 10 templates across Thariq's 9 categories, exports back to Markdown on demand. Use when asked to "plan it", "make me an html plan", "show me the plan", "render the plan", or when starting any multi-step task that needs a navigable artifact instead of a markdown wall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert security auditor for AI Skills and Bundles. Performs non-intrusive static analysis to identify malicious patterns, data leaks, system stability risks, and obfuscated payloads across Windows, macOS, Linux/Unix, and Mobile (Android/iOS).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs. Uses pandas for behavioral analytics and statistical baselines. Use when investigating insider threats or building user behavior analytics for data loss prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detecting compromised cloud credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP by analyzing anomalous API activity, impossible travel patterns, unauthorized resource provisioning, and credential abuse indicators using GuardDuty, Defender for Identity, and SCC Event Threat Detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform cross-artifact consistency analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md. Use after task generation to identify gaps, duplications, and inconsistencies before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and derive Program Derived Addresses (PDAs) and account layouts across the Pump ecosystem's four Solana programs — global singletons, per-token accounts, per-user accumulators, and cross-program coordination patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use only when actively changing glossary or ubiquitous-language terms, or recording a durable architectural decision; merely reading a glossary is not a trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and correlate events across multiple timezones with automatic conversion. Use when analyzing distributed system incidents, coordinating cross-regional operations, or creating time-normalized reports from logs/events spanning PST/CST/EST/JST or other timezones. Handles daylight saving transitions automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track design iteration history and apply consistent styling decisions across revision cycles. Use when handling follow-up change requests that reference previous design decisions (e.g., '前回も色で良いんだけど', 'same style as before', 'like we discussed').

Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Coordinate Codex work across the current task, internal subagents, user-owned tasks, worktrees, handoffs, formal review gates, or recurring automation. Use for delegation, parallel roles, another Codex task, cross-repo work, QA/review handoffs, scheduled follow-up, or task inspection and continuation. Chinese triggers include 子Agent/子进程/子对话, 另一个对话接手, 并行处理, 分给QA, 多仓库收口, 巡检, 持续推进, 定时自动继续, 创建/读取/转交任务.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Typosquat and malicious-package detection across installed dependencies (or a single prospective addition) — cross-checks AI-malware family intelligence, package-name similarity to known popular packages, low maintainer-health signals. Use when auditing a freshly-onboarded repo, vetting a single suspicious package, gating CI on supply-chain risk, or investigating an incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory projects/hymenoptera_amalgkit/doc/05_cross_species. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured research briefing for a topic or person as a Markdown scaffold (stdout or file). No persistent store.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating, modifying, explaining, or reviewing TBQ3 Bar-based trading strategies with OnBar, OnInit, OnReady, entries, exits, MarketPosition, stop profit/loss, sizing, slippage, commission, multi-symbol, or cross-period logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。