「rank」の検索結果

When the user wants a comprehensive App Store market overview, daily/weekly market briefing, or combined view of chart movements, trending keywords, featured apps, and new releases. Also use when the user mentions "market overview", "what's happening on the App Store", "market briefing", "weekly report", "market trends", or "state of the market". For chart-specific rank changes only, see market-movers. For keyword trends only, see keyword-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel read-only multi-agent root-cause investigation for bugs, regressions, crashes, flaky behavior, or unexplained failures. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, find the root cause, trace a regression, understand why something broke, or wants a ranked diagnosis with the fastest proof path without making code edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks to inspect JoCoHunt, 조코헌트, jocohunt.jocoding.io products, ideas, rankings, makers, public security headers, or wants a CLI workflow for the Korean builder community. It runs the local `jocohunt` Go CLI, including authenticated product submission when explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for hyperparameter selection — learning rate formulas, LoRA rank, batch size, group size, schedules, and model-specific tuning. Use when the user asks about learning rate, batch size, hyperparameter tuning, or how to configure training parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solution architect that creates implementation blueprints before building. Maps 2-3 approaches ranked by simplicity, creates phased build plans with rollback points, and checks dependencies. Use when you need to design a solution, create a blueprint, plan before building, or take a task from the audit and need an implementation plan. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/audit-report.md. Outputs to system/blueprints/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit authentication and session management vulnerabilities in web applications. Broken authentication consistently ranks in the OWASP Top 10 and can lead to account takeover, identity theft, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Search SDK for Python. Use for vector search, hybrid search, semantic ranking, indexing, and skillsets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO + GEO (AI-search) + brand-entity desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) — wired to Google Search Console for a dashboard over search analytics and an agent-prepared SEO opportunities review queue, plus an AI-visibility tracker (are we cited in ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / Claude / Copilot answers), a GEO content-optimization queue gated by geo-qa, and an entity / knowledge-panel readiness checklist. Use when the user invokes $kelly-seo or /kelly-seo, mentions SEO, Google Search Console, GSC, search analytics, search performance, queries, keywords, rankings, positions, impressions, clicks, CTR, striking-distance queries, title/meta rewrites, content briefs, internal links, SEO opportunities review, GEO, generative engine optimization, AI search, AI visibility, being cited by AI answer engines, ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/Claude/Copilot citations, brand entity, knowledge panel, Wikidata, schema.org, or entity readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vercel AI SDK expert guidance. Use when building AI-powered features — chat interfaces, text generation, structured output, tool calling, agents, MCP integration, streaming, embeddings, reranking, image generation, or working with any LLM provider.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage PostHog error tracking issues during a daily or on-call review. Use when the user asks "what's broken?", "what new errors do we have?", "show me top errors today", "what should I look at this morning", or wants a prioritized list of active issues to work on. Surfaces new and high-impact issues, ranks by users affected and recency, points at linked replays, and proposes next actions (investigate, assign, suppress, merge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the most informative session recording linked to an error tracking issue. Use when a user has an error tracking issue ID and wants to watch a replay showing what the user was doing when the error occurred. Ranks linked sessions by recency, activity score, and journey completeness, then summarizes the pre-error context. Replaces blind session picking from potentially hundreds of linked recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs time-to-event analysis for clinical trials including Cox proportional hazards regression with PH diagnostics, restricted mean survival time (RMST) under non-PH, competing risks via Fine-Gray vs cause-specific Cox, weighted log-rank and MaxCombo for non-proportional hazards, recurrent events (Andersen-Gill, PWP, WLW), and interval-censored data. Use when analyzing time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, DOR, TTR, TTNT) in oncology or other clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for LLMs using LoRA, QLoRA, and 25+ methods. Use when fine-tuning large models (7B-70B) with limited GPU memory, when you need to train <1% of parameters with minimal accuracy loss, or for multi-adapter serving. HuggingFace's official library integrated with transformers ecosystem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and validates predictive time-to-event models on clinical and omics data with penalized Cox, random survival forests, gradient-boosted and deep survival models, and prediction-grade evaluation (Uno's C, time-dependent AUC, integrated Brier, calibration, competing risks). Use when building an individualized risk predictor or prognostic omics signature, choosing a survival model, or evaluating one beyond the C-index. For Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and classical Cox hazard-ratio inference in a trial see clinical-biostatistics/survival-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end neoantigen discovery from somatic variants to ranked vaccine candidates. Integrates HLA typing, MHC binding prediction, pVACtools neoantigen calling, and immunogenicity scoring. Use when identifying tumor neoantigens for personalized vaccine design or checkpoint biomarkers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains ML predictions on omics data with SHAP, LIME, and permutation importance, handling the correlated-feature trap, the conditional-vs-interventional Shapley choice, and the attribution-is-not-causation boundary. Use when interpreting an omics classifier, debugging shortcut/batch learning, or deciding whether an attribution ranking can be trusted as biology. For validated feature selection see machine-learning/biomarker-discovery; explanations are not a selection method.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs molecular similarity searching using Tanimoto, Tversky, Dice, and cosine coefficients on bit/count fingerprints with explicit choice rules for symmetric vs asymmetric measures, scaffold-hopping vs lead-optimization regimes, activity-cliff diagnosis, and large-library nearest-neighbor methods (BulkTanimoto, Annoy MHFP6, USRCAT). Use when ranking compounds by structural resemblance to a query, clustering libraries, finding analogs, or diagnosing activity cliffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-method binding pocket detection and druggability assessment. Grid-based, fpocket, and P2Rank detection with druggability scoring, visualization, and cross-structure comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end molecular docking pipeline. Target preparation, pocket detection, protein-ligand docking (DiffDock/Vina), scoring, interaction analysis, and pose ranking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users discover what to build on Stellar. Use when a user says "what should I build on Stellar", "Stellar app ideas", "I want to build on Stellar but don't know what", "Stellar startup ideas", "find me a Stellar project idea", "I'm new to Stellar and want to build something", or "what's hot on Stellar right now". Interviews user sharply, then proposes ranked ideas grounded in real ecosystem gaps from the LumenLoop 728-project database and current SCF funding patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。