「report」の検索結果

Continuously monitor a GitHub PR for merge conflicts, CI failures, and CodeRabbit review comments, then automatically fix any issues found. Polls every 5 minutes and loops until every check is green. Use this skill whenever a PR has just been created or code has been pushed to a PR branch — it should be the default follow-up action after any PR creation or push. Also trigger on: "watch this PR", "guard this PR", "monitor CI", "keep fixing until green", "PRを監視して", "CIが通るまで 直して", /pr-guardian. When a PostToolUse hook reports that a push or PR creation just happened, proactively invoke this skill to start monitoring without waiting for the user to ask.

Uses capa to identify malware capabilities from a binary: running rule-based detection over disassembly, mapping matched capabilities to MITRE ATT&CK and MBC, and interpreting results to focus deeper analysis. Activates for requests to run capa, generate a capability report, or map a sample's behaviors to ATT&CK automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts indicators of compromise from raw analysis artifacts: parsing strings dumps, sandbox reports, PCAP summaries, and logs for URLs, domains, IPs, hashes, mutexes, and file paths, then deduplicating and typing them. Activates for requests to extract IOCs from analysis output, pull indicators from a report, or harvest atomic indicators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares indicators of compromise for safe sharing: defanging URLs, domains, IPs, and emails so they cannot be accidentally clicked or resolved, and formatting them into STIX/CSV/MISP-friendly output. Activates for requests to defang IOCs, sanitize indicators for a report, or export indicators for sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client reporting, quality assurance, and financial operations management. Handles KPI frameworks, compliance audits, budget tracking, and launch checklists. Use when: managing client dashboards, ensuring brand compliance, conducting QA reviews, tracking marketing spend, ensuring GDPR/CAN-SPAM compliance, handling a request to delete someone's data across the marketing stack, deciding whether an AI voice or AI presenter has to be disclosed, proofreading deliverables. Also triggers on: client reporting, QA, quality assurance, brand compliance, marketing budget, financial tracking, legal compliance, GDPR, CAN-SPAM, proofreading, launch checklist, right to erasure, right to be forgotten, data deletion request, DSAR, someone asked us to delete their data, do we delete or suppress, suppression list, they unsubscribed and we emailed them again, we deleted them and they came back, restored a backup and re-emailed people, custom audience still has deleted contacts, California Delete Act, DROP, data broker deletion, enrichment records disappearing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, creative concept diversity for Meta Advantage+ (why six variants of one ad are not a diverse library, and what to brief instead), creator-made ad creative on a spend-share deal, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pyfixest demeaner_backend="cupy64" (including its CPU fallback when cupy is absent) is NOT numerically identical to the default numba backend and does NOT drop fully-absorbed/collinear regressors the same way. Use when: (1) adding demeaner_backend="cupy64" to existing pf.feols/fepois calls changes the printed coefficient table, (2) a regression report suddenly gains rows with absurd estimates (e.g. coef 435.8, SE 7106) for controls absorbed by the fixed effects, (3) diffing outputs before/after a backend change, or (4) anything parses a pyfixest text report by line position.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Court Reporter — producing a realtime or CART feed during a deposition or trial, triaging a QC pass on a draft transcript before certification, drafting or applying an errata sheet under FRCP 30(e), reading back testimony from steno notes on a judge's request, or handling a sealed-record or in-camera confidentiality flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a bioinformatics technician — running or QC-gating a next-generation sequencing pipeline, triaging a failed or borderline sequencing run, deciding whether a variant call set is clinically/research reportable, or writing a sample-level QC report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify code-review or security-review findings for false positives using deep codebase tracing, framework-aware analysis, and web research. Produces a .verified.md report alongside the original. Use when a review report has been generated and needs independent verification, or when user runs /verify-findings, mentions "verify review", "check false positives", or "validate findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compiles binary analysis findings into structured reports — correlates facts from triage, static, and dynamic phases, validates hypotheses against evidence, and produces traceable documentation. Use when ready to summarize findings, generate a report, document what a binary does, or prepare results for handoff or archival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize pilot observations into structured debrief reports and spec updates. Use this skill when: - A pilot has completed and you have observation notes, tickets, or feedback transcripts - You need to turn messy pilot data into actionable spec changes - You want to generate edge case user stories from field observations - You need negative acceptance criteria from pilot bugs - You want a structured debrief report for stakeholder communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured weekly or fortnightly status updates for leadership and stakeholders. Use this skill when: - You need to prepare a weekly or fortnightly status report - You want to summarize recent progress across git commits, tickets, and spec changes - You need a formatted update ready for Slack, email, or a stakeholder meeting - You want multi-project updates in one report

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and document QA test execution cycles - smoke tests, regression suites, exploratory testing sessions, and release readiness checklists. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer needs to structure or report on active testing work. Trigger on phrases like "run smoke tests", "start a regression cycle", "exploratory testing session", "test this build", "release checklist", "is this build stable", "log test results", "what passed and what failed", "document my testing", "create a test run report", or any request to execute and record test outcomes. Also trigger when someone says "we need to test before release" or "can you help me track what I've tested".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an executive summary using the Pyramid Principle SCQA structure. Use when a consultant says "write an executive summary", "I need a one-pager for the exec", "how do I open this report", "write me the intro for this deck", "draft the cover memo", "I need to frame the findings", "executive doesn't have time to read the full report", "help me write the storyline", or "write the situation-complication-answer". Also trigger when someone has findings or recommendations and needs to communicate them top-down to a time-constrained audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run exploratory data analysis on a dataset and produce a structured report. Use when the user says "explore this dataset", "EDA on X", "analyze this data", "what's in this dataset", "summarize this data", "first look at the data", "understand this dataset before modeling", "data quality check", "describe this dataframe", or wants to understand a new dataset before building models or dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cross-platform attribution, conversion definitions, reporting windows, GA4, AdServices and AdAttributionKit, MMPs, browser and server events, offline conversions, and platform reconciliation. Use for attribution audit, attribution models, conversion windows, requests to add or total Meta and Google conversions, incompatible reporting-window aggregation, GA4 attribution, MMP review, AppsFlyer, Adjust, Branch, Singular, or cross-platform discrepancies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn Caveman's exact report-only repository observations into an operator-chosen optimization candidate with a paired baseline/candidate evaluation. Use when the user asks to inspect an optimization observation, evaluate a candidate change, or act on the current Caveman optimization report. Require a logged-in Caveman CLI connection and explicit approval; never infer money or actuation from a profile.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building or maintaining a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) on a Salesforce project: one row per requirement, columns for source, user-story id(s), test-case id(s), defect id(s), sprint, release, and status. Covers forward traceability (req → story → code → test) and backward traceability (test → req). Trigger keywords: RTM, requirements traceability matrix, audit trail for salesforce delivery, traceability for steerco, deferred requirement tracking, regulatory traceability. NOT for eliciting the requirements in the first place — use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf. NOT for user-story authoring — use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for UAT test design — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for Apex test design — use apex/test-class-standards. NOT for backlog prioritization — use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog. More triggers: traceability.md, build-layer traceability, REQ-XXX and FG-XXX id mapping, artefact-to-requirement orphan report, coverage-gap report, check_rtm.py --manifest-dir, owning run-time agent column, design decision ref column, metadata API name in a traceability row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。