「review」の検索結果

Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Affiliate and sponsored content generator — create natural product review, comparison, and recommendation articles that comply with ステマ規制. Integrates compliance-checker for automatic legal safety. Supports review, comparison, and experience-based formats.

This skill should be used when the user asks for an accessibility review, accessibility audit, a11y check, WCAG compliance review, screen reader audit, "is this accessible?", "does my site meet WCAG?", "check my component for accessibility", "accessibility overview of this page", "review accessibility of", "check for a11y issues", "fix accessibility issues", or any request to audit a web page, component, or codebase for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code (code.claude.com) のデプロイ・CI/CD リファレンス。 Amazon Bedrock / Google Cloud Agent Platform (Vertex AI) / Microsoft Foundry / Claude Platform on AWS 経由、Claude apps gateway、LLM gateway (protocol / rollout)、 GitHub Actions (claude-code-action) / GitLab CI/CD / GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES)、 code review 自動化・ultrareview、Slack (Claude Tag)、headless mode、cloud environments、 devcontainer、self-hosted environments（runner 構成・identity 検証・本番デプロイ）。

Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist covering state management, performance, component design, data flow, async handling, UI/UX, accessibility, security, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gemini の画像生成モデル (nanobanana) で画像を生成する。`gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview` (デフォルト) と `gemini-3-pro-image-preview` に対応。

Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenAI Codex CLI wrapper — three modes. Code review: independent diff review via codex review with pass/fail gate. Challenge: adversarial mode that tries to break your code. Consult: ask codex anything with session continuity for follow-ups. The "200 IQ autistic developer" second opinion. Use when asked to "codex review", "codex challenge", "ask codex", "second opinion", or "consult codex". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "code x", "code ex", "get another opinion".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route code cleanup, maintainability, React diagnostics, and over-engineering review to focused review modes. Use when auditing code quality or asking for a particular review lens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanguo event review loop with LangGraph Studio visualization. Use for: 三國事件審核、generic event candidates、battle candidates、event review MCQ、accepted/rejected events、promote events、LangGraph Studio、human-in-the-loop、事件候選可視化、chunk -> extract -> validate -> review -> publish。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BROWSER VFX ACCEPTANCE SKILL — Use built-in browser/headless browser to automatically verify Cocos VFX block effects and composed VFX recipes in BattleScene preview (`http://localhost:7456`, `previewMode=true`, `previewTarget=5`). USE FOR: VFX health audit, per-block smoke validation, combo recipe regression checks before merging `vfx-block-registry.ts` / `vfx-effects.json`. DO NOT USE FOR: Cocos Editor window screenshot capture, compile-error debugging, or pure log-only diagnosis without browser preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EDITOR PREVIEW SCREENSHOT SKILL — Capture the current Cocos Creator Editor window to a PNG file and inspect exactly what is already visible inside the Editor. USE FOR: visual symptoms when the user already has the target screen open in Cocos Editor / Editor Preview. DO NOT USE FOR: browser-driven QA, automatic browser target switching, reference-image comparison pipelines, compile errors, or pure log analysis. If the user wants browser screenshots, remind them to prepare the Browser Review environment and use cocos-preview-qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Working playbook preloaded into the reviewer helper; the coach updates its Lessons after each round. Use only when acting as reviewer or coaching it. NOT for writing a verifier brief (use subagent-dispatch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adding a file type or upgrading any of its capability slots in the files feature (preview, edit, thumbnail, grid card, info, share, versions, conversion, diff, rail panel). Use when supporting a new extension or MIME type, building a previewer, touching FILE_TYPES, PreviewKind, FilePreview.tsx, EDITABLE_KINDS, or surfaces/single-file/, or working the FILE_SURFACES.md wishlist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The agent.review_queue register for work Arman must see or test in the UI. Use at the end of any task that produced something reviewable, at the start of a task to check prior feedback, and when reviewing, claiming, routing, or repairing a queue row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult Claude Code from Codex for a second opinion while Codex remains responsible for implementation and verification. Use when the user asks Codex to collaborate with Claude, consult Claude, ask Claude for a plan, get a Claude review, delegate analysis to Claude, or says "Claudeと一緒に", "Claudeに相談", "Claudeにレビューしてもらう", "Claudeの意見も聞く", or "Claudeと計画を立てる". Also use when an explicit independent planning or review pass from Claude would materially reduce risk on a complex coding task.

プロジェクト監査。「監査して」「audit」「/audit」で発火。設計/UX/品質/テストなどの観点でコードベース全体を監査し、課題をissuesディレクトリに書き出す。実行ログで重複実行を防止。特定の差分・コミットのレビューには使わない（codex-review / cross-review を使う）。

専門家エージェントの並行実行＋クロスレビューで実装・改善・レビューを行う高品質ワークフロー。「/forge」「forgeで」「専門家エージェントで実装して」、またはバグ修正の自前試行が1-2回失敗した時のエスカレーション先として発火。typo修正・数行の軽微変更には使わない。レビューのみ（修正・実装まで不要）なら cross-review、Codex単体レビューなら codex-review を使う。

Create GitHub pull requests that follow the NemoClaw PR template. Use when the user wants to create a new PR, submit code for review, open a pull request, or push changes for review. Trigger keywords - create PR, pull request, new PR, submit for review, open PR, push for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。