「reviews」の検索結果

Audit an existing UI for usability, hierarchy, accessibility, and conversion problems. Reviews a live URL, screenshot, or codebase against heuristics and reports prioritized issues with fixes. Use when the user says "audit this UI", "what's wrong with this screen", "UX review", "find the problems", "why is this confusing", or has existing interface to critique. Part of the Product Design set. Can drive a browser for live audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply or adapt a dual-theme soft-neumorphic UI board for dashboards, workspaces, settings panels, admin tools, and design-system previews. Use when Codex should build or restyle interface work in a tactile soft-neumorphic style with both light and dark themes, shared semantic tokens, large radii, raised surfaces, inset fields, restrained accent states, and a complete preview board covering foundations, controls, navigation, data display, and feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply or adapt a dual-theme neo-glow control board for UI kits, design-system previews, settings surfaces, admin panels, control rooms, and dense operational interfaces. Use when Codex should build or restyle interface work with bright white or dark control surfaces, compact neumorphic cards, vertical icon rails, blue/cyan halo accents, glowing active states, luminous toggles, and a board focused on control states, inputs, and specification details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply or adapt a dual-theme liquid glass UI board for premium dashboards, workspace launchers, settings surfaces, design-system previews, and glossy interface concepts. Use when Codex should build or restyle interface work with frosted translucent panels, aurora glow accents, pill controls, circular glass actions, blurred color blooms, and a polished light-plus-dark material system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews public source notes and produces a bounded summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze bonded agent systems, escrow workflows, slashing rules, oracle trust, Sybil cost, and front-running risk in protocols where agents post bonds or stake reputation. Use for collateral sizing, griefing analysis, dispute design, and bonded-agent security reviews. NOT for smart contract auditing, DeFi tokenomics, blockchain consensus design, or trading strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape reviews, ratings, and brand mentions from multiple platforms using Apify Actors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract product data, prices, reviews, and seller information from any e-commerce platform using Apify's E-commerce Scraping Tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for read-first Amazon Sponsored Products optimization, product-aware growth, preflight readiness, and post-change monitoring reviews that can run standalone from static exports or use Rocketcart MCP as an optional Amazon Ads plus product-intelligence layer. Guides Codex to inspect Rocketcart profiles, live SP campaigns, product ads/ASIN context, category rank/BSR movement, competitor signals, product readiness, budget and targeting drift, snapshots/changelogs, and proposed approval-gated action rows without executing writes by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure every factual claim in a response is backed by verifiable evidence from the codebase, documentation, or external sources. Use when preparing technical documentation, code reviews, or any output where accuracy is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forces every code-related claim to include file:line citations. No citation means the claim must be verified or removed. Use when building documentation, writing code reviews, or any output that others will rely on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether tests detect broken behavior by tracing assertions and running narrow controlled mutations in an isolated workspace; use for test-quality reviews, not routine test execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and display the full status of the current PR — CI checks, GitHub Actions runs, reviews, and code comments — using GitHub MCP tools. Invoke manually with /pr-status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for tradeoff analysis, or when the user must pick between concrete options: "A or B?", "which library should we use?", "build vs buy", "compare these approaches". Scores options on weighted criteria, tests sensitivity and reversibility. Skip for open ideation or single-option reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PIL + ffmpeg slideshow videos: product reviews, promos, TikTok/Reels/Shorts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find overly complex code: files over 300 lines, functions over 50 lines, deeply nested conditions (4+ levels), and magic numbers. Use for code quality reviews, pre-release checks, or when asked to assess code maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code quality audit covering security, performance, and maintainability. Use for quarterly audits, pre-release reviews, or when onboarding to a large codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。