1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Query grid electricity forecasts and submit load events using EnergyKit to help users optimize home electricity usage. Use when building smart home apps, EV charger controls, HVAC scheduling, or energy management dashboards that guide users to use power during cleaner or cheaper grid periods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build 3D scenes and visualizations using SceneKit. Use when creating 3D views with SCNView and SCNScene, building node hierarchies with SCNNode, applying materials and lighting, animating with SCNAction, simulating physics with SCNPhysicsBody, loading 3D models (.usdz, .scn), adding particle effects, or embedding SceneKit in SwiftUI with SceneView. Note: SceneKit was deprecated at WWDC 2025 and is in maintenance mode; RealityKit is recommended for new projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Schedule and execute background work on iOS using BGTaskScheduler. Use when registering BGAppRefreshTask for short background fetches, BGProcessingTask for long-running maintenance, BGContinuedProcessingTask (iOS 26+) for foreground-started work that continues in background, background URLSession downloads, or background push notifications. Covers Info.plist configuration, expiration handling, task completion, and debugging with simulated launches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tokenize, tag, and analyze natural language text using Apple's NaturalLanguage framework and translate between languages with the Translation framework. Use when adding language identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text embeddings, or in-app translation to iOS/macOS/visionOS apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark Xcode clean and incremental builds with repeatable inputs, timing summaries, and timestamped `.build-benchmark/` artifacts. Use when a developer wants a baseline, wants to compare before and after changes, asks to measure build performance, mentions build times, build duration, how long builds take, or wants to know if builds got faster or slower.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strips AI fingerprints from written text by enforcing banned vocabulary, forbidden sentence structures, and authentic prose patterns. Use when writing articles, documentation, social content, emails, or any text that should read as human-authored rather than AI-generated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cuts fluff and leads with what matters. Applies Parkinson's Law, Pareto, and Goodhart's Law so every word earns its place. Use when the user wants terse output, names this skill, or signals that responses are too padded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies a modern CSS reset covering box-sizing, margin removal, text rendering, media defaults, and root stacking context. Use when starting a new web project, creating a global stylesheet, or when the codebase lacks sensible CSS defaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate overtime", "未払残業代計算", "残業代を計算", "労基法37条", "割増賃金", "深夜労働", or wants deterministic computation of unpaid overtime wages under the Labor Standards Act Article 37.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data viz design: production-level visual encodings, chart contrast, RTL axes. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing data viz design for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates or adds Convex to an app. Use for new Convex projects, npm create convex@latest, frontend setup, env vars, or the first npx convex dev run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and improves onboarding flows, empty states, and first-run experiences to help users reach value quickly. Use when the user mentions onboarding, first-time users, empty states, activation, getting started, or new user flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when turning something that happened into something that makes the next run better - "write a retro", "record this paper cut", "this bug escaped verification", "make this an eval", "why do we keep hitting this", "did that change actually help", "scorecard", "what did we learn from that run", "lessons keep getting re-learned". Covers the six-step loop (capture, classify, convert, change, measure, retro), the repo artifact each step produces, and how escaped bugs become eval cases. Do NOT use to design or judge a single workflow experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`, which this loop feeds), to decide where to run work (see `dogfooding`), or to debug one failed execution in the moment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
self-review step of mspec workflow — sanity-check all artifacts via subagent
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for training outputs, metrics logging, logtree reports, tracing/profiling, and debugging training runs. Use when the user asks about training logs, metrics, debugging, tracing, profiling, timing, Gantt charts, or understanding training output files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for installing Tinker, setting up the environment, getting an API key, and verifying everything works. Use when the user is getting started, setting up their environment, or troubleshooting installation issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: 'intake this repo/skill', 'evaluate external skill', 'should we adopt X', a candidate repo URL plus an adoption question, or any external skill/workflow/tool surfaces as a possible fit for Agistra. Structured front-door evaluation of external skills, workflows, and similar capability artifacts before any install, promotion, or adaptation decision. Ends in exactly one classification: Install candidate, Adapt concept, or Reject. Never install first — intake first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token budgeting discipline for all agents. Treats tokens as a resource from session start — not just when the buffer hits 60%. Covers prompt compression, context hygiene, handoff packing, and HOT memory pruning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Codex/Claude agent skills, profile manifests, and skill-related deploy changes before they ship. Use when creating, editing, importing, installing, or reviewing SKILL.md files, agent manifests, optional third-party skills, or plugin skill bundles. Checks trigger quality, progressive disclosure, evidence gates, security, hallucination risk, validation, and deployment impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-question-at-a-time design interrogation. Use when: 'grill me', 'interrogate this', 'one question at a time', 'brainstorm', 'let's brainstorm', 'let's discuss', 'lets discuss', 'discuss', 'walk me through', or design review start. Produces ADRs and glossary as decisions settle. Use for unsettled designs; for settled designs go straight to architecture-mode. When the design is unsettled and also has high ambiguity, several technical approaches, or security/data risk, load architecture-mode alongside.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: assessing how much context a deployed agent profile consumes before real work starts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。