「claim」の検索結果

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and adjust for horizontal pleiotropy in two-sample Mendelian randomization by distinguishing uncorrelated (UHP) from correlated (CHP) pleiotropy and choosing among Egger, MR-PRESSO, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, LHC-MR, LCV, MR-Clust, MR-Mix, and contamination-mixture methods. Use when validating an MR causal claim, running the STROBE-MR sensitivity battery, suspecting a shared heritable confounder, working under weak-instrument or polygenic-exposure regimes, or reconciling discordant estimates across robust methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL. Join or leave an org-team coordination channel as a session peer. `/companion on <channel_id> [peer_id]` registers this Claude Code session as a `pclass:"session"` peer and works the claim → execute → signal loop, escalating un-decidable forks to the lead (never deciding). `/companion off` deregisters. `/companion status` reports the current peer. Part of org mode (Article X), which is opt-in via `velocity.org_mode.enabled` and OFF by default. Use when a human launches a second session to act as a peer alongside a lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drift check between the baseline implementation on disk and the claims in `docs/init/seed.md` + cross-references in CLAUDE.md, README.md, and the rendered docs site. Verifies hook/agent/skill/command names + counts, settings.json wiring, project.json key presence, .mcp.json servers, vendored license files, and helper script presence. Exit 0 PASS / 1 FAIL — suitable for CI. Read-only; safe to invoke any time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an org-team workflow — a flat pod of up to four peer Claude Code sessions claims lane-tagged slices of an approved spec over the baseline MCP channel and implements them concurrently, each in its own git worktree. Each peer DECIDES its own in-lane implementation choices in its own main context (Article X); only un-decidable or cross-lane forks escalate peer→lead→human (yield_fork for task-bound forks, ask_lead for free-form queries). Opt-in and OFF by default (velocity.org_mode.enabled). Graduates the retired sprint-dispatch prototype into the constitutionally-sanctioned org-team model (Article X — Multi-session coordinated workflows). Requires git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit; bias to build over deliberate. Use when the user says 'andreessen', 'pmarca mode', 'should I build this', 'is there a market', 'are we at product/market fit', 'pmf check', 'pressure-test this idea', 'be brutal about this venture', 'market-first take', or wants a no-disclaimers, no-hedging, confidence-leveled verdict on whether something is worth pursuing. Also provides the 3x5-card + Anti-Todo personal productivity routine. Runs on a fixed anti-sycophancy operating prompt: leads with the strongest counterargument, never validates premises, uses explicit confidence levels, never apologizes for disagreeing. Not for polite brainstorming — this skill exists to tell you the market is dead when it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite AI-sounding prose so it reads as considered human writing — cut the tells (em-dash pile-ups, "it's not X, it's Y" antitheses, inflated vocabulary, uniform rhythm, empty uplift) while preserving every fact, claim, and the author's own voice. Use when the user says "make this not sound like AI", "de-AI this", "humanize/humanise this", "this reads like ChatGPT", "remove the AI tells", "it sounds robotic/generic", or shares a draft (post, email, essay, docs, cover letter) to sharpen into a more human voice. Ships a stdlib scanner that flags the mechanical tells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forces Claude to extract exact quotes from files before making claims about them. Prevents hallucinations by grounding every statement in actual text from the codebase. Use when working with large files or unfamiliar code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure every factual claim in a response is backed by verifiable evidence from the codebase, documentation, or external sources. Use when preparing technical documentation, code reviews, or any output where accuracy is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assign confidence scores (0-100) to every claim in a response. Helps users understand which parts are verified facts and which are educated guesses. Use when the user needs to know how much to trust each part of the answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Never claim completion without fresh verification evidence

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify every claim from multiple independent angles -- code, docs, tests, git history. Use when you need high confidence that something is correct before acting on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClaw-native SIEGER-aligned customer intelligence. Use a structured evidence bundle to produce a bilingual report with claim-level evidence, decision gates, industry-specific analysis, and proposed sales angles that require explicit approval before email drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: "is this right?", "what am I missing?", "poke holes", "sanity check", "devil's advocate", "red team this". Skip for execution-only tasks and wording edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subagent that scans CopilotKit + AG-UI releases shipped in (and just after) the report window, diffs the git tags to extract what each release actually fixed, and returns a fix-map the weekly-report writer cross-checks against open issues. Catches issues that are quietly already-fixed in a shipped release, and is the authoritative source for the "current release vX.Y.Z" version claims. Invoked by weekly-report (spawned in parallel with the Discord/GitHub pulls); runs as a general-purpose subagent so the orchestrator's context stays small.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multi-agent work through durable artifacts in git instead of chat. Use this whenever a task involves sending a message to another agent, agent mailboxes or handoffs, claiming work from a shared queue, notifying another agent or crew (OpenClaw, Grok Bot, Claude Code, Codex, Gas Town/Gas City workers) that work is ready, or whenever the user mentions the artifact bus, message bus, agent mail, beads mail, doorbells, or pings between agents — even if they don't say "bus" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive agent-flow setup. Scans the repo read-only, proposes AGENTS.md, DOCS_INDEX.md and CONTEXT_MANIFEST.json with a confidence marker per claim, asks the user for protected paths and risk boundaries, writes each file only after approval. Use when setting up agent-flow, when context files are missing, or when asked to write an AGENTS.md, onboard a repo for AI agents or set protected paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintenance for agent-flow context. Runs /doctor, /sync-context, /audit-risk, /repair-docs, /garden, /debt and /audit-lean; re-verifies context claims against the code before refreshing timestamps; turns repeated agent mistakes into mechanical checks. Use on a schedule, after merges flagged [CONTEXT_STALE], or when asked whether AGENTS.md is stale or the risk baseline needs review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package completed data analysis and ML work so an independent recipient can reproduce the claimed results, verify artifact lineage, and operate the handoff within its stated scope. Use when finalizing a project, study, model package, or review bundle; not for deploying to a live system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。