「decision」の検索結果

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a topic against preserved sources and write a draft-status research article under `research/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when asked to research a topic, compare options, synthesize sources, gather evidence, or extend an existing research doc. Carries the full procedure: scan existing coverage, agree a research rubric, capture every source verbatim before analyzing, write the article incrementally so a crash never loses work, cite every claim, and link it back into the graph. Does not promote findings to canonical knowledge — that is the sibling `consolidate-notes` skill, after a decision lands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Administers Observal users, settings, diagnostics, review queues, security events, audit logs, SAML, SCIM, the local Observal server, its upgrades and rollback, and its own PostgreSQL and ClickHouse schema migrations. Use when the user needs privileged governance, submission decisions, identity configuration, security investigation, or Observal server operations. Not for querying a database or any work outside Observal administration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel divergent ideation for coding agents. Spawns N isolated branches under different cognitive frames (regulator, biology, speedrunner, 10-year-old, $0 budget), scores, clusters, prunes traps, and deepens top survivors. Use on /adhd, "ADHD mode", brainstorm/ideate intents, or open-ended design, architecture, naming, API/SDK surface, and fuzzy-debugging decisions. Skip for syntax, lookups, bugs with known root cause, or closed phrasing ("quick", "standard", "canonical", "textbook"). Full pre-flight gate is in the skill body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interrogate a plan, decision, or design one question at a time until it holds — use to stress-test your own thinking before committing to it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-provider AI debates between Claude and available advisors — use for critical decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read every ADR markdown file in the project's docs/adr/ folder so you have full context on past decisions. Use only when the user explicitly calls it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually-invoked skill that stops overthinking and forces a short, practical decision. Use only when the user explicitly invokes stop-overthinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep track of open topics and decisions. Use when the user says "keep-track" or asks to keep a running list of remaining items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the agent to list all choices it made during the current work that it is not confident of. Manual-only; the user must ask for it by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and inspect external sources for product, design, technical, or comparative research; verify provenance and turn findings into decisions. Use for requests to investigate online, research X posts or demos, compare approaches, or deepen a research task. Complements a research orchestrator without taking over its state or stop conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or revise a Marin experiment pipeline that binds reusable work into an artifact graph. Use for new workflow entrypoints, stage wiring, and pipeline placement decisions; use a narrower domain skill when it owns the launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Store a learning, pattern, or decision in the memory system for future recall

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade any skill to v5 Hybrid format using decision theory + modal logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose wasted paid-ad spend, pacing, and allocation, then propose safe evidence-backed optimizations. Use for waste, negatives, budgets, bid changes, poor CPA or ROAS, underpacing, overspend, or scaling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。 English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。