1,730 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Interact with Azure DevOps repositories, pull requests, and APIs using the AZURE_DEVOPS_TOKEN environment variable. Use when working with code hosted on Azure DevOps or managing Azure DevOps resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the primary outcome is creating publishable source-attributed content from URLs or supplied material, including research summaries, articles, briefs, and posts whose factual claims and quotations need reader-visible, verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides Hatchling build backend guidance for Python packaging — use when configuring pyproject.toml metadata, build targets (wheel, sdist, binary), file selection with git-style globs, build hooks, metadata hooks, version management (code/regex/env sources), editable installs, the hatch-vcs plugin, plugin development, build environment setup (UV/pip/Cython), setuptools migration, or troubleshooting Hatchling errors. Covers PEP 517/518/621/660 standards and context variable interpolation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add automated documentation updater to any Claude skill. Creates a Python sync script that downloads upstream docs, processes markdown for AI consumption, and maintains local cache with configurable refresh. Collects template variables, then delegates implementation through 5-phase workflow. Use when adding auto-updating reference documentation to plugins or skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge reference for Autonomous Refinement Loop research — pattern research into prerequisites for autonomous execution without synchronous human blocking gates. Defines failure categories, prerequisites, and conditions for replacing human judgment with machine-verifiable checks. Use when designing or evaluating autonomous agent loops, gate conditions, or HOOTL execution patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate MCP servers into Claude Code plugins — covers .mcp.json configuration, plugin.json mcpServers field, server types (stdio, SSE, HTTP, WebSocket), environment variable expansion, tool naming conventions, OAuth and token authentication, security best practices, and testing workflows. Use when adding an MCP server to a plugin, configuring MCP authentication, debugging MCP tool discovery, setting up Model Context Protocol integration, or choosing between stdio and SSE transport types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify one falsifiable factual claim against evidence appropriate to the claim. Use when a concrete assertion about software, documentation, configuration, releases, or repository behavior must be classified as VERIFIED, REFUTED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestration or planning agents are producing task plans, task prompts, or TASK.md instructions that must be unambiguous, verifiable, and resistant to hallucination. Applies CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective) to structure and write agent task prompts, then adds CoVe (Chain of Verification) checks where accuracy risk is meaningful. Activates on draft task prompts, swarm plans, migration tasks, and multi-step plans requiring independently executable steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bash 5.1 release features and improvements with practical examples. Use when working with Bash 5.1 features, epoch time variables, redirection enhancements, or when user asks about Bash 5.1 changes, new features, or version-specific capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dasel v3 query patterns for InstallAnywhere .iap_xml installer definitions — use when querying action sequences, discovering variables, resolving platform conditions, navigating panels, or comparing installer variants. Files are 2.5+ MB, 65,000+ lines — too large for context reads, requires structural dasel queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when querying, modifying, or converting JSON, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV, HCL, or INI with dasel v3. Complete reference for selectors, functions, conditionals, variables, spread operator, type casting, and format-specific patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bash 5.2 release features and improvements with practical examples. Use when working with Bash 5.2 features, variable handling enhancements, readline improvements, or when user asks about Bash 5.2 changes, new features, or version-specific capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, create, run, monitor, and maintain Vapi Simulations for assistants and squads. Use for turning plain-language requirements into a coverage plan, simulation personalities, scenarios, structured-output success criteria, simulations, suites, extending an existing suite, chat or voice runs, tool mocks, target variables, lifecycle webhooks, regression coverage, launch readiness, CI quality gates, run-result analysis, and simulation API validation errors. Do not use for fixed-turn mock-conversation Evals unless the user is deciding between Evals and Simulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, create, update, and verify Vapi Squads and documented handoff tools through the public API. Use for choosing a single assistant versus a multi-assistant Squad, persistent or transient members, entry-member ordering, specialization boundaries, context engineering, variable extraction, model-specific handoff patterns, assistant-version pins, and safe Squad updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds until an idea, design, or draft has no unexamined decision — numbered questions, each with why it matters and a recommended answer, facts looked up rather than asked, and settled decisions written to a file. Stages are idea (topic or hunch to a falsifiable question and contribution claim), design (estimand, identification, sample and power, measurement, analysis plan, pre-registration, venue), and defend (reviewer objections to a finished design or draft). Use when the user says "grill me", asks to stress-test or poke holes in an idea, design, or plan, asks what they are assuming, or brings an idea that is not yet a design. --plan grills software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments, covering question wording, scale construction and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting and soft launches, respondent burden with attention and speeding rules, sensitive questions and social-desirability bias, and treatment delivery. Use when the user writes or revises survey questions, chooses a scale, orders blocks, plans a pilot, or worries respondents will not answer honestly. Indirect measurement goes to list-experiment, multi-country instruments to cross-national-design, and live-survey operations to qualtrics-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses: DGP and DAG, identification, estimands, SESOIs, test choice among NHST, equivalence, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and hypothesis tiers. Use when converting a research question into testable predictions or predicting a null.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one consequential, contestable decision through a deliberative committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus, chaired by fable (default), astra, opus, or sol. Not for factual lookups, brainstorming, routine implementation, independent-coder reliability, or final professional judgment. Use when several options are defensible and the two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank under a predeclared rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。