8,908 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AI DevKit · Testing phase guidance for adding and validating feature test coverage. Use when the user wants to write tests, update testing docs, run coverage, close coverage gaps, or run dev-lifecycle phase 8.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check/manage Azure quotas and usage across providers. For deployment planning, capacity validation, region selection. WHEN: "check quotas", "service limits", "current usage", "request quota increase", "quota exceeded", "validate capacity", "regional availability", "provisioning limits", "vCPU limit", "how many vCPUs available in my subscription".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute Azure deployments for ALREADY-PREPARED applications that have existing .azure/deployment-plan.md and infrastructure files. DO NOT use this skill when the user asks to CREATE a new application — use azure-prepare instead. This skill runs azd up, azd deploy, terraform apply, and az deployment commands with built-in error recovery. Requires .azure/deployment-plan.md from azure-prepare and validated status from azure-validate. WHEN: "run azd up", "run azd deploy", "execute deployment", "push to production", "push to cloud", "go live", "ship it", "bicep deploy", "terraform apply", "publish to Azure", "launch on Azure". DO NOT USE WHEN: "create and deploy", "build and deploy", "create a new app", "set up infrastructure", "create and deploy to Azure using Terraform" — use azure-prepare for these.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for instrumenting webapps with Azure Application Insights. Provides telemetry patterns, SDK setup, and configuration references. WHEN: how to instrument app, App Insights SDK, telemetry patterns, what is App Insights, Application Insights guidance, instrumentation examples, APM best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .codex/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and validate HVE Core agents, prompts, instructions, and skills with current frontmatter, package membership, delegation, tracking, documentation, and validation conventions. Use when authoring a GitHub Copilot customization artifact in this repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-discovery, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive structured autoresearch iteration after evo:discover and the baseline commit. Use when the user invokes /evo:optimize or asks to try ideas, try variants, run experiments, use available GPUs, improve the current best/frontier, continue an evo search, or compare candidate changes in an evo workspace. The orchestrator plans and spawns optimization subagents; candidate edits/runs belong to those subagents. Width is set via subagents=N (1 for serial workloads, larger for parallel); the loop's structural value applies at any width.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build boolean and X-ray search strings to source candidates. Use when asked to build a boolean search, source candidates on LinkedIn/Google, write an X-ray search, or find people with specific skills. Produces ready-to-paste boolean strings (with synonyms, must-haves, and exclusions), X-ray variants for LinkedIn/GitHub, and a refinement plan to widen or narrow the result set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and risk-rate hidden assumptions in a product brief or PRD. Use when asked to review a product brief for assumptions, audit a PRD for risks, find hidden assumptions, validate product plans, or run an assumption analysis. Produces a prioritised assumption map with confidence and impact scores, recommended validation methods, and critical assumption flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan an apprentice's or new laborer's first week so they're useful by Friday and safe from hour one — day-by-day teaching order, the safety non-negotiables stated before anything else, what they're allowed to touch unsupervised, and the check-out conversation that decides week two. Use when a tradesperson says 'my apprentice starts Monday', 'how do I train the new guy', or 'the apprentice is useless and I don't have time to teach'. Produces a first-week plan, a can/can't-touch list, and the Friday review script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan tests for an API endpoint or service — functional, negative, and contract. Use when asked to test an API, write API test cases, plan REST/GraphQL endpoint testing, or validate an API contract. Produces an API test plan — per-endpoint cases (status codes, schema, auth, validation, errors), boundary/negative cases, contract checks, and non-functional notes — so the API is verified beyond the happy 200.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with per-tool verdicts (keep/consolidate/cut), the honest-measurement method behind each number, and a baseline plan for whatever can't be scored yet. To forecast ROI before an investment use roi-estimator; this skill measures what already happened.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run automatic SPICE simulations on subcircuits detected from KiCad schematic analysis — validates filter frequencies, divider ratios, opamp gains, LC resonance, and crystal load capacitance. Supports ngspice, LTspice, and Xyce (auto-detected). Generates testbenches, runs batch mode, produces structured pass/warn/fail report. Use when the user asks to simulate, verify, or validate any analog subcircuit — RC filters, LC filters, voltage dividers, opamp circuits, crystal oscillators. Also for "simulate my circuit", "run spice", "verify with simulation", "check my filter cutoff", "does this divider give the right voltage", "what's the bandwidth of this opamp stage". Consider suggesting simulation during design reviews when the schematic analyzer reports simulatable subcircuits and a SPICE simulator is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search Ashby public job boards (no key needed) and read/write the Ashby ATS: candidates, jobs, applications. Trigger phrases: ashby, job board, candidates, hiring, job search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when `hogli ci:insights` or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a flaky job, when asked to check Trunk Flaky Tests for a test, PR, or master, or when asked to deflake, stabilize, or fix a flaky Jest, pytest, or Playwright test. Core discipline: reproduce locally before changing anything, fix the root cause (never mask it with sleeps, retries, or bigger timeouts), and prove the fix with an N-run validation loop sized to the observed failure rate. Stabilizing is not the only valid outcome — the skill also gates whether the test should exist, so deleting a test that catches nothing real, or re-leveling one that flakes because of the level it runs at, are first-class endings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consolidate all SAST vulnerability results from the sast/ folder into a single final report ranked by severity and confidentiality impact. Reads all *-results.md files and produces sast/final-report.md. Run after all vulnerability detection skills complete. Use when asked to generate a final report, consolidate findings, or summarize security results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/graphql-results.md. If no GraphQL technology is found in Phase 1, later phases are skipped. Use when asked to find GraphQL injection, unsafe GraphQL document construction, or operation string injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find template rendering sites that use dynamic strings), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/ssti-results.md. Use when asked to find SSTI or template injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install Codex themes and Codex skin packs with npx skills. Use this skill when a user wants Codex to find, download, validate, apply, switch, remix, or restore Codex desktop themes such as caishen-readable, caishen-lite, mythic-guardian-noir, global-founder-bright, export-night, or caishen-max. It stages verified public-safe theme packs from ChannelerH/codex-skin-packs, checks theme.json/background.png, preserves the native Codex layout, avoids private workspace screenshots, and provides restore guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visually validate an interactive CLI or terminal UI in Codex's in-app browser using a real local PTY, fixed rendering, keyboard interaction, screenshots, and session evidence. Use for TUI layout changes, terminal menus, colors, prompts, resize behavior, keyboard flows, or proof-of-work where Codex would otherwise reach for Computer Use or a desktop terminal. Do not use for desktop-terminal-emulator-specific behavior or ordinary non-interactive command output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。