「nda」の検索結果

Diagnoses stalled teams or agent hierarchies with Beer's VSM and Ashby's Law. Use when orchestrators overload, escalations pile up, or team boundaries need redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes availability for redundant and series designs, failover, SPOFs, fault trees, FMEA, Weibull, and error budgets. Use when asking what uptime a design gives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan my LinkedIn content", "create a content calendar", "what should I post about this week", "plan my posting schedule", or when Genesis proactively suggests a weekly content plan during surplus compute. Also triggered by "I need post ideas" or "I don't know what to write about".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounds version-sensitive engineering decisions in authoritative current sources by detecting the installed stack, retrieving official documentation or source, reconciling conflicts, and recording citations and confidence. Use for framework APIs, dependency behavior, standards, compatibility, migrations, or technical recommendations that may have changed. Not for stable project-local logic or broad product discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits game assets for compliance with naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards, and pipeline requirements. Identifies orphaned assets, missing references, and standard violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a phone call to book an appointment or reservation. Checks calendar first, gets explicit consent before dialing, discloses AI identity on the call, and adds the booking to calendar when done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initiate natural language Q&A through Amazon's storefront Alexa shopping assistant to get shopping guidance answers, recommended product groups, ASIN lists, and follow-up questions. Each call supports only 1 prompt; for follow-ups, the agent must summarize context and concatenate a new question for a new request. A url can be used to supplement Amazon page context. Trigger when the user mentions Amazon Alexa, Alexa shopping assistant, Amazon smart assistant, AI shopping guide, conversational product selection, natural language shopping, Amazon chat Q&A, Amazon Alexa shopping, conversational shopping, AI shopping assistant, follow-up questions, product recommendation conversation, context follow-ups. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Alexa", if their need is to "ask for product recommendations on Amazon using natural language", this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Nexscope (Search Intelligence Framework) data to analyze ASIN traffic source composition and exposure distribution, covering current period/previous period/newly entered/exited period comparisons. Trigger when the user mentions ASIN traffic sources, traffic structure analysis, organic traffic vs paid traffic share, exposure score breakdown, period comparison, new/exited traffic keywords, competitor traffic analysis, SP ad keyword count, brand ad exposure, Amazon's Choice exposure, editorial recommendation exposure, Top Rated exposure, video ad exposure, organic search exposure ratio, PPC traffic sources, promotional deal traffic sources, recommendation slot structure breakdown, ASIN traffic analysis, traffic sources, organic traffic share, ad traffic share, exposure analysis, traffic structure, period-over-period comparison, keyword churn, Nexscope. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope", if their need involves analyzing an ASIN's traffic sources, exposure channel distribution, cross-period comparison, or competitor traffic structure comparison, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maximal Marginal Relevance rerank — get diverse top-k instead of redundant top-k. Use when standard search returns 5 near-duplicates, or when you want broader coverage of a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages all git operations (commit, push, branch management, PR creation) in a standardized, safe, and consistent way. Automatically runs the code-review skill before any commit. Enforces Conventional Commits standard. Handles the full lifecycle: branch → review → commit → push → PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply evidence-first engineering discipline to any agent-built software project: fact discovery before action, evidence-calibrated status reporting, explicit change boundaries and stage gates, controlled confirmation for risky or external actions, sensitive-information redaction for anything shared publicly, and resumable continuity after interruptions. Use when users ask an agent to take over an existing codebase, deliver a feature across stages, verify whether work is actually complete, judge release readiness, or keep conclusions honest about what is proven versus assumed. This foundation skill is domain-neutral; vertical suites (for example mini-program engineering) build on it by adding domain facts and platform rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map which elements of an assignment benefit from AI assistance vs. which AI use undermines. Use when redesigning tasks for AI-age classrooms or setting defensible AI use policies for specific assignments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides and best practices for working with Neon Serverless Postgres. Covers setup, connection methods, branching, autoscaling, scale-to-zero, read replicas, connection pooling, Neon Auth, and the Neon CLI, MCP server, REST API, TypeScript SDK, and Python SDK. Use when users ask about "Neon setup", "connect to Neon", "Neon project", "DATABASE_URL", "serverless Postgres", "Neon CLI", "neon", "Neon MCP", "Neon Auth", "@neondatabase/serverless", "@neondatabase/neon-js", "scale to zero", "Neon autoscaling", "Neon read replica", or "Neon connection pooling".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"

Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.

Twitter/X Agent Operations SOP v2 — Rebuilt from real dual-account operations. Real data: • CN account: grew from 1,150 → 3,679 followers (~14 months), 1 tweet/day, OAuth1 direct post • EN account: Buffer API • Real incidents: cron silent-failed for 2 weeks unnoticed, analytics data off by 17×, thread performance worse than single posts What's new in v2: • Step-by-step onboarding (Q1→Q6), multiple choice wherever possible — no big forms • Mandatory daily log after every tweet + weekly report every Monday • Pre-publish safety checklist (agent must pass before posting) • Content pool tracker (used/unused) + alert when ≤3 items remain • Dual-account credential separation (CN: OAuth1 / EN: Buffer API) • MASTER-STATUS.md as the single source of truth — read + write every session 🇨🇳 Twitter/X Agent 运营 SOP v2 — 基于真实双账号运营经验重写。 开局对话式收集 context、强制日报+周报、发推前红线自检、素材库追踪、双账号凭证分离、MASTER-STATUS.md 单一真相来源。 真实数据：中文账号从 1,150 粉增长至 3,679 粉（约14个月），1条/天。 Triggers: "twitter运营" | "推特agent" | "发推SOP" | "AI代运营" | "推文日报" | "素材库" | "Buffer API" | "OAuth1发推" | "twitter automation" | "tweet sop" | "推特涨粉"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified backlog to 10-day sprint cadence to veto power rules. What's inside: • Dual-layer Kanban system (master backlog + sprint board with unified tagging) • 10-day sprint standard process (Day 1 dev → Day 6 testable build → Day 10 ship) • Issue template with reproducibility requirements (3x reported = auto-severe) • Tri-party alignment meetings (daily standup / sprint planning / sprint review) • Operations veto power on releases (P0 bug = block shipping) • User feedback → product iteration closed loop (beta testing + interview SOP) • Core metrics framework (acquisition → activation → retention → monetization → referral) • Technical debt management (20-30% sprint capacity reserved) • Ready-to-use templates: Bug Report, Sprint Planning, Responsibility Matrix Built from: Real product strategy meetings + beta testing frameworks. References Supabase sprint model, Manus/DeepSeek commercialization alignment. By @WeiYipei. 🇨🇳 你的研发团队在做没人要的新功能，用户反馈的 Bug 堆了三个月没人动。运营觉得研发不听用户，研发觉得运营不懂技术。这份 SOP 给你从统一看板到 10 天迭代节奏到一票否决权的完整产研运协同框架。 🇯🇵 開発チームは誰も求めていない機能を作り、ユーザーから報告されたバグは何ヶ月も放置。このSOPは、統一バックログから10日スプリント、リリース拒否権まで、プロダクト×エンジニアリング×オペレーションの完全な連携フレームワークを提供します。 🇰🇷 개발팀은 아무도 요청하지 않은 기능을 만들고, 사용자가 보고한 버그는 몇 달째 방치됩니다. 이 SOP는 통합 백로그부터 10일 스프린트, 릴리스 거부권까지 제품×개발×운영 완전 협업 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Triggers: "product ops" | "engineering operations" | "product development SOP" | "sprint planning" | "iteration management" | "cross-functional alignment" | "product engineering ops" | "dev ops collaboration" | "产研运协同" | "迭代管理" | "产品研发运营" | "プロダクト開発運営" | "제품개발운영"

DDDの集約(Aggregate)設計ルールに基づくコードレビュー・設計支援・リファクタリングを行う。 Evans Rules、Vernon's 4 Rules、Design by Contractに基づき、集約の境界定義、不変条件の検証、 不変(Immutable)設計、ID参照、結果整合性、ドメインイベント連携を包括的にガイドする。 以下のいずれかに該当する場合は必ずこのスキルを使用すること： - 集約(Aggregate)の新規設計・実装・リファクタリング（どの言語でも） - 既存の集約やエンティティクラスのDDD観点でのコードレビュー - 集約の境界決定（「AとBは同じ集約にすべきか？」「この集約は大きすぎるか？」） - 集約内の不変条件・整合性境界の設計 - 集約間の連携方式の判断（ドメインイベント、結果整合性、Sagaパターン） - 可変(Mutable)な集約コードを不変(Immutable)設計にリファクタリングする - publicフィールド、直接参照、push/appendなどカプセル化違反の検出・修正 キーワード例：集約、Aggregate、aggregate boundary、集約ルート、AggregateRoot、 エンティティ設計、DDD実装、Vernon Rules、Evans Rules、集約の分割、真の不変条件

Use when answering questions about IFRS standards, IAS standards, IASB, financial reporting, revenue recognition, lease accounting, impairment, financial instruments, expected credit loss, ECL, consolidation, business combinations, fair value measurement, first-time adoption, deferred tax, provisions, insurance contracts, journal entries, disclosure requirements, IFRS compliance checks, audit support, GAAP differences, goodwill, or transitioning from local GAAP to IFRS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER professional providing comprehensive financial planning across all CFP Board practice domains. Integrates retirement, investment, tax, estate, insurance, and education planning following CFP Board Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct. Use for holistic financial plans, cash flow analysis, net worth statements, insurance needs, estate planning coordination, education funding (529 plans), tax strategies, retirement projections, or CFP Board Practice Standards compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data governance strategy, quality validation rules, and data dictionary management for vehicle insurance platform. Use when defining data quality standards, implementing validation rules, managing field mappings, resolving data conflicts, or establishing data governance processes. Covers data cleaning standards, quality metrics, and mapping management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。