「review」の検索結果

Set up Convex backups and run a restore DRILL that proves recovery — snapshot, restore into a throwaway preview, assert the data came back — plus a schedule matched to your RPO and a gated recovery runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve test value and feedback cost when auditing slow, flaky, redundant or brittle tests; choosing tests during implementation; or reviewing test changes before a commit or PR. Keep ordinary implementation and pre-commit use scoped to the affected behavior, not a repository-wide audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or repairing Spark regression tests for asynchronous ownership, cancellation, persistence, restart recovery, or cross-surface projections. Not a coverage campaign, performance benchmark, source-text policy check, or full delivery review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PSR-4 autoloading standard knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for namespace-to-path mapping, composer.json configuration, directory structure, and common mistakes. Use for autoloading audits and project structure reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOLID principles knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP with detection patterns, PHP examples, and antipattern identification. Use for architecture audits and code quality reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documentation QA knowledge base. Provides quality checklists, audit criteria, and metrics for documentation review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PSR-1 and PSR-12 coding standards knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for basic coding standard and extended coding style with detection patterns, examples, and antipattern identification. Use for code style audits and compliance reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Academic paper search across 14+ scholarly platforms including arXiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, Sci-Hub, and more. Use for literature review, research discovery, and citation management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing CS research papers (conference, journal, thesis), reviewing scientific manuscripts, improving academic writing clarity, or preparing IEEE/ACM submissions. Invoke when user mentions paper, manuscript, research writing, journal submission, or needs help with academic structure, formatting, or revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user requests to add academic papers to a BibTeX bibliography file while maintaining format consistency and sourcing from appropriate repositories. This skill handles 1) Reading existing BibTeX files to understand formatting conventions, 2) Searching for academic papers across multiple sources (OpenReview for conference papers, arXiv for preprints), 3) Extracting proper BibTeX metadata from conference pages or arXiv entries, 4) Determining appropriate citation format (@article vs @inproceedings) based on publication venue, 5) Appending new entries while preserving existing file structure and formatting. Triggers include requests to 'add to ref.bib', 'update bibliography', 'cite papers', or when working with academic reference files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation formatting rules for law review articles using The Bluebook (21st ed.) academic style

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply timeless programming wisdom from "97 Things Every Programmer Should Know" when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Use for design decisions, code quality checks, professional development guidance, testing strategies, and workflow optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply 37signals/DHH Rails conventions when writing Ruby on Rails code. Use when building Rails applications, reviewing Rails code, or making architectural decisions. Covers various aspects of Rails application architecture, design and dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinator workflow for orchestrating dockeragents through fix-review-iterate-present loop. Use when delegating any task that produces code changes. Ensures agents achieve 10/10 quality before presenting to human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. Part of the skills-for-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification loop for Spring Boot projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and diff review before release or PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling React views, or enforcing design consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。