1,171 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Microsoft docs lookup, code samples, and SDK reference for Azure, .NET, Microsoft 365, Windows, and Power Platform via Microsoft Learn MCP. Use for API reference or official MS documentation retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JavaScript/TypeScript ES2024+, async/await, DOM manipulation, Node.js, and API integration. Use when writing vanilla JS/TS code, working with REST/fetch APIs, implementing frontend logic, or configuring JS build tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map tasks to specialist agents. Use when choosing which agent for a job, comparing agent capabilities, or routing to React/Next.js/Playwright/docs/code-quality experts. Keywords: which agent, best agent for this, delegate to expert, agent capability mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review working changes - code quality, security, library correctness, and standards auto-fix
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building React components, optimizing Next.js performance, implementing accessibility, or reviewing frontend code quality for modern web applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session — trigger phrases "execute the plan", "independent tasks", "parallel tasks", "subagents for the plan","split the plan into subagents". Dispatches a fresh subagent per task with two-stage review after each: spec compliance first, then code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for continuous improvement, error proofing, and standardization. Use this skill when the user wants to improve code quality, refactor, or discuss process improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go バックエンドの品質チェック（golangci-lint + Swagger 生成）。「lint」「golangci-lint」「静的解析」「swagger」「OpenAPI」「ドキュメント生成」などのキーワードで自動適用。
Full QA review pipeline — security audit (OWASP Top 10), performance analysis, accessibility check (WCAG 2.1 AA), and code quality review
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to audit ad revenue performance or diagnose yield drops - Someone asks about header bidding configuration or Prebid.js optimization - You are analyzing fill rates, eCPM trends, or ad unit performance - A project involves programmatic advertising, SSP integration, or ad serving - You need to verify ads.txt, sellers.json, or supply chain compliance - Someone mentions CPM floors, bid density, or auction dynamics - You are evaluating ad quality controls, viewability, or ad-related UX impact - A codebase integrates Google Ad Manager, AdMob, Prebid, or any SSP TRIGGER PHRASES: "ad yield", "eCPM", "fill rate", "header bidding", "Prebid", "programmatic ads", "ad monetization", "CPM optimization", "ad revenue", "ads.txt", "ad serving", "SSP", "ad unit performance", "viewability"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need framework-agnostic OpenAPI 3.x guidance — spec structure, metadata and versioning, paths and operations, reusable schemas, security schemes, examples, documentation quality, contract validation (e.g. Spectral), breaking-change awareness, and handoffs to codegen — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review an OpenAPI; Improve an OpenAPI; Improve API contract; Improve API schema design. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies standard AI review policy guidelines for midstream (implementation) phase reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify tumor neoantigens from somatic variants with pVACtools (pVACseq/pVACfuse/pVACbind/pVACvector/pVACview) for personalized cancer vaccines and checkpoint biomarkers. Encodes the field's hard truth that binding prediction is the easy, near-solved part and single-digit-percent PPV lives downstream — so it centers clonality/CCF, HLA LOH (the silent invalidator), expression, proximal-variant phasing, agretopicity/foreignness quality, and the predicted->presented->immunogenic validation tiers. Use when nominating vaccine targets, ranking neoantigens, or building a tumor-to-candidate pipeline. Binding details in mhc-binding-prediction; ranking in immunogenicity-scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。