「framework」の検索結果

Modernize legacy systems incrementally using the strangler fig pattern. Use when replacing components while preserving business operations, test coverage, and integration contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master C#/.NET backend development patterns for building robust APIs, MCP servers, and enterprise applications. Covers async/await, dependency injection, Entity Framework Core, Dapper, configuration, caching, and testing with xUnit. Use when developing .NET backends, reviewing C# code, or designing API architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage major dependency version upgrades with compatibility analysis, staged rollout, and comprehensive testing. Use when upgrading framework versions, updating major dependencies, or managing breaking changes in libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master modern business analysis with AI-powered analytics, real-time dashboards, and data-driven insights. Build comprehensive KPI frameworks, predictive models, and strategic recommendations. Use PROACTIVELY for business intelligence or strategic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate from AngularJS to Angular using hybrid mode, incremental component rewriting, and dependency injection updates. Use when upgrading AngularJS applications, planning framework migrations, or modernizing legacy Angular code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert backend architect specializing in scalable API design, microservices architecture, and distributed systems. Masters REST/GraphQL/gRPC APIs, event-driven architectures, service mesh patterns, and modern backend frameworks. Handles service boundary definition, inter-service communication, resilience patterns, and observability. Use PROACTIVELY when creating new backend services or APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backtesting systems for trading strategies with proper handling of look-ahead bias, survivorship bias, and transaction costs. Use when developing trading algorithms, validating strategies, or building backtesting infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements an accepted incremental brownfield migration from native iOS or Android to React Native or Expo using @callstack/react-native-brownfield. Use after the brownfield path has been selected, when setting up the integration, packaging XCFramework or AAR artifacts, or adding React Native surfaces to native hosts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of `.tex`, `.qmd`, or `.md` text for AI-voice tells — boilerplate transitions ("Moreover", "Furthermore", "It is important to note that"), AI-cliché lexicon ("delve", "navigate the complexities", "tapestry", "robust framework"), em-dash overuse, symmetric paragraph shapes, tricolon abuse, hedging stacking, "not only X but also Y" frames, and formulaic openers. Produces a report; does NOT rewrite. Use when user says "humanize", "does this sound like AI?", "check for AI tells", "de-AI this draft", "remove AI voice", "audit my prose for sycophancy", or before journal submission / posting a working paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 执行力诊断。用阿德勒心理学框架诊断你「知道该做什么但就是不做」的真正原因。 触发方式：/dbs-action、/action、「我知道该怎么做但就是不做」「为什么我总是拖延」 Execution block diagnosis using Adlerian psychology framework. Trigger: /dbs-action, "I know what to do but can't do it", "why do I procrastinate"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 商业模式诊断。两种模式：问诊（消解你的问题）和体检（拆解你的商业模式）。 触发方式：/dbs-diagnosis、/问诊、「帮我看看商业模式」「诊断一下我的业务」「我有个商业问题」 Business model diagnosis using dontbesilent's ontological framework. Two modes: consultation (dissolve your question) and checkup (analyze your business model). Trigger: /dbs-diagnosis, "diagnose my business model", "I have a business question"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 概念拆解。用维特根斯坦 + 奥派经济学的方法，把模糊的商业概念拆到原子级别。 触发方式：/dbs-deconstruct、/拆概念、「帮我拆解这个概念」「这个词到底什么意思」 Concept deconstruction using Wittgenstein + Austrian economics framework. Trigger: /dbs-deconstruct, "deconstruct this concept", "what does this really mean"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Unreal Engine 5 C++ gameplay code: the UCLASS/UPROPERTY/UFUNCTION reflection macros, the Gameplay Framework (GameMode, Pawn, Character, PlayerController, Actor components), and the module Build.cs. Use when writing or debugging UE C++, deriving from AActor/ACharacter/ AGameModeBase, exposing properties to the editor or Blueprints, or when the user mentions Unreal C++, UCLASS, GENERATED_BODY, GameMode, ACharacter, or .Build.cs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deploying an existing web application or API to an already-running Azure Kubernetes Service cluster. Detects the framework, generates a Dockerfile and Kubernetes manifests, validates against AKS Deployment Safeguards, and deploys with verification. WHEN: deploy app to AKS, deploy to existing AKS cluster, containerize app for Kubernetes, generate K8s manifests for Azure, set up CI/CD for AKS, my AKS deployment is failing safeguard checks, I have a Django/Express/Spring Boot app to run on AKS. DO NOT USE FOR: creating or provisioning an AKS cluster (use azure-kubernetes), assessing migration to AKS Automatic (use azure-kubernetes-automatic-readiness), or deploying to non-AKS targets like Web Apps, Container Apps, or Functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /test to write a test suite for code you just built or changed, after implementing a feature, route, or fix. Targets uncommitted changes automatically, reads test preferences.json for your framework (asks and saves it if absent), and picks the right strategy per file: happy path, edge cases, error states, accessibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the i18n framework, replacing hard-coded strings, ensuring en-US/zh-CN coverage, mapping error codes to localized messages, and validating key parity, pluralization, and formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。