1,432 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Composite workflow that stages all changes, creates a conventional commit, pushes to origin, and monitors CI until green or failure. Use when you want to commit and push in one step with CI monitoring. Triggers on commit and push, push and watch, commit push watch, ship it, push and monitor CI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral activation for depression: Breaking the vicious cycle, activity monitoring, weekly planning, and values-based activities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Frontline Sceptic archetype, the experienced staff member who will live with the change, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, adoption risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a frontline review", "give me the shop-floor view of this rollout", "pressure-test adoption of this plan" or "what will the team actually say about this". Do not use for employee consultation, monitoring or works council preparation, use works-council-reviewer instead; for people strategy or restructuring, use chro-reviewer; for product evidence, use cpo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a project or processing description and returns a DRAFT data protection impact assessment pack: processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with blank rating cells, mitigations to consider and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to "start a DPIA for the new monitoring tool", "draft a data protection impact assessment", "scaffold a DPIA from this processing description" or "what would the DPO need for a DPIA on this". Do not use for redacting or de-identifying a document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Find leaked or mentioned selectors circulating in pastes, leak forums, Telegram channels and dump markets, and judge whether a claimed leak is genuine or a recycled combolist. Use when checking whether a name, email, domain or credential is circulating, verifying a breach claim made against your organisation, or setting up ongoing leak monitoring
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Programmatically clear WP Rocket cache from a third-party plugin / theme when data changes — the public rocket_clean_* function family (rocket_clean_post, rocket_clean_files, rocket_clean_term, rocket_clean_user, rocket_clean_home, rocket_clean_minify, rocket_clean_cache_busting, rocket_clean_domain, rocket_clean_cache_dir). Critical detection rule — WP Rocket is a PAID plugin not on Packagist; always feature-detect via function_exists('rocket_clean_post') OR defined('WP_ROCKET_VERSION') before calling, since not every site has it. Never raw-unlink the cache directory or call wp_cache_flush() expecting it to clear WP Rocket — wp_cache_flush is WP object cache, WP Rocket is FILE cache. The before_*_clean_* / after_*_clean_* action lifecycle hooks fire around every clean — useful for audit logging, monitoring, custom invalidation chains. Use when integrating cache invalidation in a companion plugin, WC integration, custom data plugin. Triggers on rocket_clean_, before_rocket_clean, af...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape reviews, ratings, and brand mentions from multiple platforms using Apify Actors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build a media list for my launch", "write a launch press release", or "pitch press under embargo"; produces a three-tier media and analyst list (Tier 1 exclusive candidates, Tier 2 vertical press, Tier 3 communities and newsletters), an embargo pitch timing skeleton keyed to the launch-registry date, a press-release draft in standard structure with no fabricated quotes or numbers, and an analyst briefing outline. Not for press-kit assets — use launch-asset-packager; not for follow-up sequence mechanics — use outreach-manager; not for post-launch news-echo monitoring — use launch-monitor. 媒体名单/禁运期pitch/新闻稿/分析师简报
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate professional paid advertising across Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for account intake, source-grounded audits, strategy, budget and measurement planning, creative production, experiments, reporting, monitoring, and explicitly approved campaign changes. Also trigger on PPC, paid social, retail media, attribution, tracking, landing pages, cross-platform conversion totals, negative keywords or search terms, beta-feature scoring, stale platform claims, API-token or credential setup, campaign deletion, and safe Claude Ads installation or uninstall.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor paid-ad account pacing, delivery, performance, creative fatigue, tracking, policy, and data quality across supported platforms. Use for daily or weekly checks, anomaly review, budget pacing, post-launch verification, or campaign monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure designs define operability basics: SLO/SLI, monitoring, alerting, on-call actions, and incident handling expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrates Sentry error tracking and performance monitoring into Flutter apps using `sentry_flutter`. Use when setting up crash reporting in Flutter, calling `SentryFlutter.init`, adding `SentryNavigatorObserver` to GoRouter, tracing HTTP requests with `sentry_dio`, capturing handled exceptions via `Sentry.captureException`, adding breadcrumbs, configuring session replay (`replay.onErrorSampleRate`), tuning `tracesSampleRate` or `profilesSampleRate`, controlling PII with `sendDefaultPii`, or setting user context after login and logout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for monitoring explicitly authorized delivery tasks and reporting stalled work. Report-only: findings are produced in the session or as a draft; no scheduled action is taken.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage production Grafana dashboards for real-time visualization of system and application metrics. Use when building monitoring dashboards, visualizing metrics, or creating operational observability interfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Federal Register rules, notices, and agency documents. 4 tools for regulatory monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FEMA disaster declarations, NOAA weather alerts, and USGS earthquake data. 3 tools for real-time disaster monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search NHTSA vehicle recalls, FDA food/drug recalls, and CFPB consumer complaints. 3 tools for product safety monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud infrastructure and DevOps workflow covering AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD, monitoring, and cloud-native development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Application Insights SDK for .NET. Application performance monitoring and observability resource management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。