Calculate material waste factors and losses using CWICR norms. Apply waste percentages, cutting losses, and spillage factors to material quantities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
7,440 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Calculate material waste factors and losses using CWICR norms. Apply waste percentages, cutting losses, and spillage factors to material quantities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build cost assemblies from CWICR work items. Combine multiple items into reusable templates for common construction elements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply machine learning for construction project risk assessment. Predict schedule delays, cost overruns, and safety incidents using historical data and project characteristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
マーケティングコピーの編集・レビュー・改善を行うスキル。 「コピーを編集して」「文章を校正して」「コピーのフィードバック」等のリクエストで発動。 Multiple focused passes による体系的な編集アプローチ。
Assesses architecture decisions, ADR compliance, and coupling. Use when evaluating design changes or validating structural decisions before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses decision reversibility and risk at critical checkpoints. Use when a workflow reaches a high-stakes branch needing escalation check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when looking for a meta-analysis topic before any protocol exists. Starts from a professor's publication profile or from a clinical question, finds gaps, assesses feasibility and returns a ranked topic list. Running the review itself is /meta-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorously and honestly assess a NEW or proposed covariance / correlation / precision estimator, or a new covariance scoring rule, using precise. Use when someone proposes, asks to evaluate, or wants to compare a covariance methodology. Covers implementing it to the contract, conformance, benchmarking against the registry, out-of-sample validation, and statistically defensible inference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Dagster OSS: assets, jobs, Definitions, config/resources, schedules/sensors, automation, CLI/local development, deployment operations, GraphQL/webserver, Pipes external processes, components/projects, or editing the Dagster repository itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a report-ready walkthrough.md for a SOLVED engagement - populate the Evidence gallery from the poc/ images captured during the engagement, and draft the step-by-step reproduction from state/loot/log (Killchain.md for pentest/bugbounty, state.md's Chain/Status for ctf) without fabricating. Use when asked to "write the walkthrough", "assemble the walkthrough", "close out the box/engagement", or at close-out once an engagement is marked SOLVED.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence hygiene before any FIND moves to Completed or enters a report. Cookie redaction, PII black-bar, HAR sanitization, screenshot metadata strip. Run after /triage passes and before final report assembly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide when to delegate to Honey's read-only subagents (hive-scout, hive-reviewer) instead of working inline, so the expensive tokens — large file reads and review passes injected back into the orchestrator's context — come back compressed (Honey Lever 3). Use when a task is search-heavy or review-heavy, spans many files, or you want to keep the orchestrator's context small. Not for trivial one-file work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate", "reindex", "repair registries", "check links", "run the continuity, pacing, clue, voice, or name checks", "count words", "summarize a story project", "import an existing manuscript", "export a manuscript", "run a build", "generate a diagram", "record revision-pass status with `story passes`", "run the story CLI", or wants deterministic maintenance on a Story Skills markdown project. It runs the CLI and reads its output; NOT for judging a finding or revising the story to fix it (use revision-continuity for continuity errors and revision passes, plot-structure for pacing, voice-style for voices and prose, genre-craft for clues and fair play), or for sharing a review copy with readers (use feedback-triage).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ongoing vendor privacy compliance monitoring program. Covers annual reassessment procedures, continuous monitoring signals, contract renewal privacy triggers, performance metrics, KPIs, and vendor governance reporting dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of UK international data transfer mechanisms post-Brexit including the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA), UK Addendum to EU SCCs, UK adequacy assessments, and ICO transfer risk assessment tool. Keywords: UK IDTA, UK addendum, ICO TRA, post-Brexit transfers, UK GDPR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-contract vendor privacy due diligence per GDPR Article 28(1). Covers risk questionnaires, technical controls assessment, certification review, data flow analysis, and documented sufficiency decisions for processor engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses the GDPR Article 30(5) exemption for organisations under 250 employees. Covers the three exception conditions that negate the exemption: non-occasional processing, risk to data subject rights, and special category data processing. Activate for Art. 30(5), 250 employee exemption, small business RoPA, SME exemption, occasional processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function covering ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Maps NIST PF controls to GDPR requirements for dual-framework compliance. Keywords: NIST Privacy Framework, IDENTIFY function, ID.BE, ID.DA, ID.IM, ID.RA, privacy risk assessment, data actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function including ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Provides control mapping, gap analysis templates, and implementation workflows for privacy risk identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preparation guide for ISO 31700 privacy by design for consumer goods certification. Covers the 30 requirements across design, production, and disposal phases. Includes gap assessment methodology, remediation planning, and mapping to GDPR Article 25 data protection by design obligations for consumer-facing products and services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides privacy impact assessment for emerging technologies including IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, and digital twins. Covers risk identification methodology, proportionality assessment, and technology-specific privacy challenges. Activate when evaluating new technology adoption, innovation projects, or emerging tech procurement. Keywords: PIA, emerging technology, IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, digital twins, innovation privacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts comprehensive inventory of protected health information across the enterprise per HIPAA Security Rule requirements at 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) and §164.310(d). Covers identification of all ePHI repositories, data flow mapping, classification of PHI by sensitivity, and integration with risk analysis. Keywords: PHI inventory, ePHI, data mapping, information asset, data flow, HIPAA risk analysis, designated record set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages the organisational DPIA register tracking all Data Protection Impact Assessments across the enterprise. Covers DPIA lifecycle management, status tracking, review scheduling, Art. 35(11) periodic reassessment, and supervisory authority reporting. Implements a centralised register linking DPIAs to RoPA entries, risk registers, and mitigation plans. Keywords: DPIA register, DPIA tracking, Art. 35(11), review schedule, DPIA lifecycle, centralised register, DPIA portfolio management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides a structured risk scoring methodology for Data Protection Impact Assessments aligned with ENISA threat taxonomy and ISO 29134. Covers likelihood and severity assessment, risk matrix construction, inherent vs residual risk calculation, and risk appetite thresholds per EDPB WP248rev.01 guidance. Keywords: risk scoring, DPIA risk matrix, likelihood, severity, ENISA, ISO 29134, residual risk, risk appetite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。