「technical」の検索結果

"Apply Actor-Network Theory (Latour, Callon) to trace how human and non-human actors (actants) form networks through translation processes. Use this skill when the user needs to map sociotechnical assemblages, analyze how innovations stabilize or fail through network-building, trace the four moments of translation (problematization, interessement, enrollment, mobilization), or when they ask 'how did this technology become accepted', 'who and what holds this network together', or 'why did this innovation fail to gain traction'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better search rankings and user experience. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose page speed issues, improve Largest Contentful Paint, reduce layout shift, or pass Google's page experience signals — even if they say 'my site is slow', 'Core Web Vitals failing', or 'page speed optimization'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for significant technical choices—frameworks, data stores, API shapes, ML platform decisions. Use when documenting a decision, onboarding, or superseding a prior approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-activates during requirements analysis to evaluate technical stack compatibility, recommend appropriate technologies, and assess performance implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design system architecture, API contracts, and data flows. Use when translating analyzed requirements into technical design for feature implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect technical debt — duplicated code, dead code, TODOs, and oversized functions across the codebase. Use at the end of a session or when auditing code hygiene. Trigger on "find tech debt", "any dead code", "duplicated code", "code hygiene", "techdebt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a durable feature spec before touching code. Reads the codebase map, reads related models/migrations to ask technical questions (not generic ones), then produces a structured spec doc in docs/specs/. Designed to pipeline with /implementation --issue N. Use before any feature implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix bugs and technical debt with minimal ceremony. Issue GitHub optional — provide one for traceability or work free-form. Replaces /issue-fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing rules for the regelrecht docs site (docs/). Use when writing or editing prose under docs/ — RFCs, guides, component docs, concept pages, and the NL/EN landing copy. Keeps docs prose free of AI-generated tells and consistent with the site's government-technical register. Not for code, commit messages, or PR descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and act on code-review feedback with technical judgment. Use before applying external suggestions, especially when feedback is ambiguous, broad, or may conflict with repository constraints, and carry confirmed corrections to relevant consumers without widening scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for hands-on repository work when a quiet, risk-scaled engineering method can improve design, implementation, debugging, review, delegation, workspace lifecycle, or verification. Keep clear local changes direct, preserve the complete requested outcome, and add method only where risk or uncertainty justifies it. Do not use for general technical explanations, simple file lookup, casual discussion, or non-engineering writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write structured Requests for Proposal (RFP) or Requests for Quotation (RFQ) aligned with ISO 20400 sustainable procurement principles. Cover scope, technical requirements, evaluation methodology, and commercial terms. Use when sourcing vendors, services, or equipment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw budget-versus-actual data into plain-language explanations for non-finance managers. Focus on why numbers moved, what it means for the team, and what action to take — without requiring accounting knowledge. Use when managers need to understand their cost center performance. Do not use for technical accounting analysis, tax preparation, or external audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize month-end or quarter-end close blockers, reconciliations, owners, and evidence gaps into a routine control pack. Use when the work is finance close coordination and issue tracking. Do not use for accounting judgment, policy interpretation, or final technical accounting conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cybersecurity partner skill for acting as a practical security collaborator across architecture review, threat modeling, secure design, risk prioritization, defensive planning, vulnerability remediation, incident readiness, security roadmaps, and technical decision support. Use when the user wants an ongoing security advisor, reviewer, or second set of eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in the core business rules and logic of web applications. This skill focuses on manipulation of application workflows, pricing, inventory limitations, and multi-step processes. Use this skill when bug hunting or testing e-commerce, banking, or SaaS platforms where standard technical vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS/SQLi) are not present but the application's logic is flawed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent common AI report pitfalls — bug blending, inflated threat models, and generic language. Train Claude with your best past reports for concise, technical submissions. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit technical, on-page, and AI-search SEO for pages, sites, and content. Use when the user asks for `/seo-audit`, `/ai-seo`, SEO review, keyword targeting, heading structure, metadata, internal linking, content gaps, AEO, GEO, LLMO, or competitor SEO comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a clear, actionable malware analysis report covering summary, sample identity, capabilities, IOCs, ATT&CK mapping, and detection guidance for both technical and decision-making audiences. Activates for requests to write, structure, or review a malware analysis or reverse-engineering report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep codebase exploration, architectural research, and solution discovery. Use when investigating problems, understanding complex flows, or evaluating technical approaches without jumping straight into code mutation or TDD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。