「check」の検索結果

Validate custom agent file format and structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate acceptance criteria and feature completion. Use when checking if features pass, validating test results, verifying acceptance criteria, or determining feature completion status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4.0 — Acceptance Criteria lock checkpoint before implementation. Consolidates all ACs from PRD, TechSpec, and Tasks, presents to user for confirmation, and saves the locked AC list to accepted-criteria.md. Implementation only starts after explicit user confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Farm CLI quick reference. Use when running af commands to check correct syntax, subcommands, and flags. Prevents guessing at command names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open Source License guidance, selection, compliance review, and drafting. Use this skill when users ask about choosing open source licenses, checking license compatibility, reviewing projects for OSS compliance, generating LICENSE/NOTICE files, or understanding specific license terms. Triggers include questions about MIT, Apache, GPL, BSD, LGPL, AGPL, copyleft, permissive licenses, license compatibility, SPDX identifiers, or any OSS licensing topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investor Targeting Specialist. Use to identify, qualify, and tier investors for a round based on stage, sector, geography, check size, and portfolio fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X/Twitter public sentiment research. Searches X for real-time perspectives, market sentiment, expert opinions, breaking news, and community discourse. Use when: user asks "what are people saying about", "X/Twitter sentiment", "check X for", "search twitter for", "what's CT saying about", or wants public opinion on a stock, sector, company, or market event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pull requests for overall quality before merging. Combines code quality and security checks at PR level. Use when performing pre-merge review in Operations Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コーディングパターン準拠チェックを実行するスキル。 「パターンチェック」「コーディング規約」「coding pattern」「パターン準拠」 「コード規約チェック」「規約違反」「パターン違反」などのキーワードで発動する。

Run Phase 4 (feedback routing) after an adversarial review FAIL. Routes adversary findings to the earliest affected phase, checks iteration limits, and escalates to human if limits are exceeded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when applying VCSDD to TypeScript/JavaScript projects. Provides fast-check property testing patterns, Stryker mutation testing, and vitest/jest integration for the VCSDD pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill during Phase 5 formal hardening. Provides tool selection, proof harness patterns, security/purity audit expectations, and verification result interpretation for Rust (Kani), Python (hypothesis), and TypeScript (fast-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when evaluating VCSDD grading dimensions during adversarial review. Provides concrete evaluation checklists for each of the 5 dimensions and convergence signal detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Phase 6 (convergence check) for the active VCSDD feature. Validates four-dimensional convergence: finding diminishment, finding specificity, criteria coverage, and duplicate detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill during Phase 6 convergence checks. Provides four-dimensional convergence analysis, hallucination detection, and duplicate finding identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the hyalo CLI instead of read/edit/grep/write when working with markdown (.md) files that have YAML frontmatter. This skill MUST be consulted whenever pi is working with markdown documentation directories, knowledgebases, wikis, notes, Obsidian-compatible collections, Zettelkasten systems, iteration plans, or any collection of .md files with frontmatter. Trigger this skill when: searching or filtering markdown files by content, tags, or properties; reading or modifying YAML frontmatter; managing tags or metadata across documents; toggling task checkboxes in markdown; getting an overview of a documentation directory; querying document properties or status fields; bulk-updating metadata across many markdown files; or when you find yourself repeatedly using read/edit/grep/write on .md files. Even if the user does not mention "hyalo" by name, use this skill whenever the task involves structured markdown documents with frontmatter. For pi sessions, ALWAYS use `--format text` for compact, LLM-friendly output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

STIX 2.1 bundle creation reference. Object types, relationships, and JSON templates for structured threat intelligence sharing. Includes the per-claim mapping of evidence grades (access level and claim support) from /quality-of-information-check to STIX confidence, and the reverse mapping on import.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。