「one」の検索結果

Use when existing copy needs tightening for clarity, accuracy, tone consistency, or executive readability without changing the underlying message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits your Cowork setup across five categories, scores each one, and gives you a prioritized improvement plan. For reviewing how well you are using Cowork, when optimizing your workspace configuration, or during a quarterly productivity review. Use when the user says "health check", "am I using cowork right", "optimize my setup", "cowork audit", "what am I missing", "is my setup good", or "how do I get more out of cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides you through setting up your first automatic task in Cowork — picking the right one, configuring the schedule, and making sure it runs correctly. For enabling background automation while you focus on other work, when setting up recurring morning briefings or end-of-day summaries, or during an automation setup session. Use when the user says "schedule a task", "automate something", "run this every day", "recurring task", "first scheduled task", "daily automation", or "can cowork do something automatically".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches you how to break large tasks into stages, save your place between sessions, and recover smoothly when a task gets interrupted. Use when planning a multi-day project, for breaking down large work into manageable stages, during recovery from an interrupted session, when managing complex ongoing work, or when the user says "cowork stopped in the middle", "token limit", "task too large", "context management", "how to do big tasks", "session got cut off", "cowork forgot what we were doing", "how do I work on something over multiple days", "it lost track of the project", or "my task is too big for one session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interviews you about a task you repeat often, then walks you through building a custom skill for it using Cowork's built-in skill creator — no coding required. For packaging a repeating workflow into a one-phrase trigger, when teaching Cowork your personal process from scratch, or during a skill library build session. Use when the user says "create a skill", "teach claude my workflow", "custom skill", "make cowork do this automatically", "automate my process", "I do this every week", or "how do I make a skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shows you how to use Cowork's parallel workers to run multiple tasks at the same time instead of one after another — dramatically cutting the time on batch work. For processing large batches of files or research tasks, when running multiple independent analyses simultaneously, or during a performance optimization session. Use when the user says "speed up", "parallel workers", "batch task", "process multiple files", "why is cowork so slow", "faster", "do several things at once", or "can cowork multitask".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating /goal directives, reusable testable outcome-oriented success standards for agentic workflows. Use whenever the user asks to create a goal, write a /goal directive, define what good looks like, set success criteria for an agent, define a reusable instruction, create a quality standard, write acceptance criteria for an agent workflow, or specify done conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Indicator pivoting methodology — how to use one known indicator to discover related infrastructure across the IOC graph. Decision tree by indicator type with concrete `/lookup-*` commands per pivot, a worked multi-hop example, pivot-quality scoring, and routing into the rigor pipeline. Use when the user asks "what else is connected to this IP / domain / hash / cert / actor?", needs to expand a single seed IOC into a campaign cluster, or wants the canonical reference for graph-walking IOCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to query a MISP instance for existing events/attributes/objects, or push new intel into MISP — adding attributes to an event, creating an event, or uploading a STIX 2 bundle as one or more events. Two-way integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends to check whether an indicator is already known to your CTI sharing community, and by analytical skills that want to publish their findings back to MISP. Reads $MISP_URL and $MISP_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an assistant's own closing line left in the document), to compare documents for overlap, or mentions signs-of-ai / SignsOfAI. Backed by the SignsOfAI engine — for a measured 0–100 score, sentence-rhythm burstiness, originality, citations, a writer baseline or perplexity, hand off to that engine (web app, CLI or MCP server) as described below. It cannot determine who wrote a text and must never imply that it can.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud security posture skill for AWS, Azure, GCP, and multi-cloud. Covers IAM least-privilege, key and secret hygiene, network exposure, data protection, logging coverage, IaC scanning (Terraform, CloudFormation, Bicep, Pulumi), CSPM remediation, and landing-zone hardening. Use for misconfig discovery, IaC review, and automated drift-and-fix workflows on cloud accounts you own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty workflow skill for program scope mapping, recon-to-report automation, deduplication against prior submissions, and high-signal reporting on HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack, and self-hosted programs. Use to organize bounty work end to end while staying inside program rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A two-phase repair skill that analyzes errors and suggests fixes before executing repairs. Phase one: user describes error, agent analyzes and proposes solution. Phase two: upon approval, executes the repair action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured interviews with the user. Use when multiple decisions need user input: ask ONE question at a time, wait for response, record answer, then proceed to next question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Claude Code slash commands and OpenCode command files that delegate to subagents. Use when creating new commands or refactoring existing ones to follow the delegation pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route plain-language requests for Pi, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, or ACP harness work into either OpenClaw ACP runtime sessions or direct acpx-driven sessions ("telephone game" flow). For coding-agent thread requests, read this skill first, then use only `sessions_spawn` for thread creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When reviewing, optimizing, or inheriting an LLM agent, systematically identify what's actually load-bearing vs. cruft. Instruments usage, ablates components, and strips the agent to minimum viable form. Answers: "What can we remove without degrading quality?" The goal is the leanest agent that still works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Main orchestrator for autonomous coding operations. Use when running autonomous sessions, coordinating components, managing the full lifecycle, or orchestrating implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session ritual. Close finished beads, file new ones for remaining work, run verify, commit in logical groupings, push. Work is not complete until git push succeeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。