「eq」の検索結果

Test a changed user interaction for realistic sequence failures such as double submission, stale responses, navigation, and recovery; use for interaction QA rather than general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get advice on app improvements and functionality from a Wasp expert. Takes optional arguments for more specific requests e.g. `/expert-advice how can I improve account management?`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Do market research, user research, and product validation on Reddit with semantic search across 50K+ subreddits, 20M+ posts, and 40M+ comments via reddapi.dev - search by meaning, not keywords, no Reddit OAuth or app registration needed. Use when the user wants to research what people say on Reddit, find user pain points and complaints, validate a product or niche idea, do competitor and market research, track subreddit trends over a date range, or discover which subreddits discuss a topic. Also use when the user mentions 'Reddit research', 'Reddit 调研', 'search Reddit', 'subreddit discovery', 'niche validation', 'pain points', 'user complaints', or 'Reddit trends'. Requires REDDAPI_API_KEY. For B2B lead scoring, see reddit-leads; for a bare API reference, see reddit-search-api.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain vision, user journeys, evolving requirements and roadmap outcomes when intent or acceptance changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map requirement acceptance to proportionate executable checks and real user journeys before implementation and completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Replica pull requests using the same shared conventions and project guides as implementation agents. Use when reviewing changes to code, tests, workflows, or documentation in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Copilot browser canvas first for rendered route checks, interaction tests, screenshots and visual, responsive or accessibility evidence. Use configured isolated Playwright MCP only when the canvas is unavailable for a required check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a GitHub pull request following Medox conventions (author spicode-bot, reviewer spideystreet). Invoke manually with /pr — do NOT trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go / no-go gate before any deployment. Checks failure modes, rollback plan, cost, production bar, and definition of done. Trigger before releasing to any environment that carries real consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern discovery, eligibility, and submission of a plugin or skill to official directories, registries, marketplaces, and curated GitHub lists. Use when preparing or sending plugin listings, marketplace forms, directory PRs, or repository recommendations; require current policy evidence and a final human confirmation before every external submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify like Fable 5 — obsessive, systematic, evidence-based quality assurance woven into your reasoning. Use this skill when you have just written or modified code, need to confirm something works, are running tests, or need to validate output against requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Models what a competitor will do next and what happens if you respond - best response, equilibrium, and the difference between a rival who optimises perfectly and one who does not. Use before a price change or price war, when a competitor launches something, when deciding whether to match a rival's move, when analysing a market with few players, or when someone asks "what will they do if we do this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark a rolling-wave slice done on explicit user authority, regardless of its current lifecycle status or missing implementation, finalization, review, verification, or child-project state. Use when the user says a slice is done, complete, finished, accepted, or should be marked done; capture available material learnings, update project state, and output roadmap progress without requiring earlier workflow steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a pull request description from the current branch diff plus rolling-wave project context. Use when the user wants PR body text, changes, potential risks, or reviewer notes for a branch, especially after completing a rolling-wave slice. Defaults to the Git Town parent branch when no base branch is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bind NeatContext to the current Kimi Code session, route requests, and load selected context grounding safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the complete release workflow: changelog entry, version bump, git tag, and GitHub release. Invokes changelog-entry, tag-version, and publish in sequence. Use when releasing a new version of the project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a deep architectural analysis or security review requiring extended reasoning. Use for complex architecture decisions, security audits, or when standard analysis is not finding the root cause.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize the current pull request including diff, comments, and review status. Use when reviewing a PR, preparing for a review meeting, or getting a quick PR overview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the current uncommitted diff and give a detailed summary with risk assessment. Use when asking what changed, reviewing changes before a commit, or requesting a change summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, order and deliver a batch of backlog items (e.g. every High item) in a Conventional Docs repo, one decision, branch, worktree, draft PR, review and merge per item. Use when asked to work through the backlog, implement all items of a priority, or sequence several backlog items end to end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learn from consequences, not instructions — generate and enforce constraints from experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。