7,301 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematic experimental results analysis workflow for ML/AI research papers. Connects experimental data to publication-ready Results sections with statistical validation, visualizations, and quality checks. Triggers on "analyze experimental results", "generate results section", "statistical analysis of experiments", "compare model performance", "create results visualization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a single failing test that reproduces a bug after its root-cause analysis is complete, before any fix is written. TRIGGER when: a bug has a completed root-cause analysis and you need the failing reproduction test, writing a test that proves a bug exists, the second step of the bug-fixing pipeline. DO NOT TRIGGER when: still triaging or diagnosing the bug → opsmill-dev-analyzing-bugs; implementing the fix once the test exists → opsmill-dev-fixing-bugs; general feature test-first work → superpowers test-driven-development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs root-cause analysis of a bug — from a GitHub issue, an issue URL, or a free-text description — before any reproduction or fix is written. TRIGGER when: triaging or diagnosing a bug, investigating why something misbehaves, an issue number/URL handed over for analysis, needing the root cause before touching code. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a failing reproduction test already exists and you are ready to fix → opsmill-dev-fixing-bugs; writing that reproduction test → opsmill-dev-test-driving-bugs; capturing a new bug as a ticket → opsmill-dev-creating-issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Problem-solving with Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis textbook
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Code session analysis, tool call patterns, efficiency metrics, and anti-pattern detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive analysis - feature matrix, SWOT, market positioning, benchmark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codebase'i knowledge graph olarak analiz et. Dependency, call graph, hotspot analizi.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user uploads Excel (.xlsx/.xls) or CSV files and wants to perform data analysis, generate statistics, create summaries, pivot tables, SQL queries, or any form of structured data exploration. Supports multi-sheet Excel workbooks, aggregation, filtering, joins, and exporting results to CSV/JSON/Markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for repository architecture, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess tests for an identified code or test change, feature, PR or commit. USE FOR: review changed behavior or regression tests, prove pre-fix/missing behavior is detected, revision-bound red-green evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE without an identified change: hypothetical mutations or general suite blind spots (test-gap-analysis). Also exclude per-test readiness/A-F grades (grade-tests), coverage (coverage-analysis), new suites (code-testing), or mutation engines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use `pvanalyze` to inspect existing .NET `.nettrace` files from the command line, including GC, JIT, CPU stacks, allocation, DATAS, events, exceptions, timeline, and call-tree analysis with JSON or SpeedScope. USE FOR: the user mentions pvanalyze, PerfView-style CLI trace analysis, or cross-platform .nettrace inspection; the task starts from an existing .nettrace file and needs. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) for a named .NET method, class, or file. USE FOR: explicit CRAP calculation or coverage-and-complexity risk within that named target, including which tests to prioritize. DO NOT USE FOR: project-wide coverage/CRAP, plateaus, or project-wide blockers/priorities (coverage-analysis); behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis); writing tests; test runs without CRAP context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies existing tests by standard traits and reports their distribution. USE FOR: tagging all tests with category attributes, categorizing/tagging/ labeling each test, compare happy vs error paths, audit the test mix, describe coverage shape by test type, or tag then verify the project builds. Read bodies when names mislead. Apply canonical attributes; otherwise report only. DO NOT USE FOR: requests owned by test-anti-patterns, coverage-analysis, crap-score, test-gap-analysis, code-testing, or migration skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security log parsing, anomaly detection, SIEM query building, Sigma rule creation, and correlation rule development across Splunk, Elastic, QRadar, and Microsoft Sentinel
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Network traffic analysis, PCAP parsing, IDS/IPS rule creation, firewall configuration auditing, and network anomaly detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSL/TLS auditing, cipher suite analysis, hash algorithm identification, encryption implementation review, and cryptographic weakness detection in code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binary analysis, assembly interpretation, disassembly, decompilation, firmware RE, and protocol reverse engineering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic exploratory data analysis. Activate when a dataset needs profiling — structure check, nulls, outliers, distributions, correlations — before deeper analysis begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conversion funnel analysis with drop-off investigation. Use when analyzing multi-step processes, identifying conversion bottlenecks, comparing segments through a funnel, or optimizing user journeys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create concise executive summaries from detailed analysis. Use when preparing board decks, executive briefings, or condensing complex analysis into decision-ready formats for senior audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。