2,105 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when implementing Kafka, RabbitMQ, Pulsar, or JMS producers and consumers in Spring Boot 3. Covers event contracts, idempotency, retries, dead-letter handling, ordering, and outbox delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing Kafka, RabbitMQ, Pulsar, or JMS producers and consumers in Spring Boot 4. Covers modular starters, event contracts, idempotency, retries, dead letters, and outbox delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research uncertain questions with an explicit, user-approved web search or ChatGPT consultation, then present options and wait for implementation approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integracao completa com Amazon Alexa para criar skills de voz inteligentes, transformar Alexa em assistente com Claude como cerebro (projeto Auri) e integrar com AWS ecosystem (Lambda, DynamoDB, Polly, Transcribe, Lex, Smart Home).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Geracao de imagens humanizadas via Google AI Studio (Gemini). Fotos realistas estilo influencer ou educacional com iluminacao natural e imperfeicoes sutis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves the quality of images, especially screenshots, by enhancing resolution, sharpness, and clarity. Perfect for preparing images for presentations, documentation, or social media posts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vendor privacy risk tiering methodology for processor management. Covers scoring factors including data volume, sensitivity, transfer locations, certifications, breach history, and control maturity with weighted risk calculation and tier assignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-contract vendor privacy due diligence per GDPR Article 28(1). Covers risk questionnaires, technical controls assessment, certification review, data flow analysis, and documented sufficiency decisions for processor engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Addresses HIPAA privacy and security requirements for health data interoperability under the 21st Century Cures Act, ONC Health IT Certification Program, and CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Covers information blocking prohibitions, FHIR API patient access, TEFCA exchange purposes, and privacy safeguards for health information exchange. Keywords: interoperability, information blocking, FHIR, TEFCA, Cures Act, patient access API, health information exchange.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides compliance with China's Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, effective 1 November 2021). Covers consent requirements, cross-border transfer mechanisms (CAC security assessment, standard contracts, certification), separate consent triggers, and critical information infrastructure obligations. Keywords: PIPL, China data protection, CAC security assessment, cross-border transfer, separate consent, CIIO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud service provider privacy assessment framework. Covers ISO 27018 cloud privacy controls, CSA STAR certification, SOC 2 Type II evaluation, shared responsibility model mapping, data residency verification, and cloud-specific privacy risk analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform text-heavy slides into visual storytelling. Suggest layout improvements, icon usage, and data visualization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
把本地长视频/音频转写成文字稿 + 可选字幕，纯本地（不上传云端），用 sherpa-onnx X-ASR Zipformer transducer 模型（int8 量化、中英双语、自动标点）。已在 macOS Apple Silicon（int8 + AMX，~100× 实时）、Linux ARM64（CPU，~32× 实时）与 Windows（PowerShell 5.1，CPU）端到端验证。使用 `$lecture-to-md` 默认 ASR 后端；默认不要换成 Qwen。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BigCommerce integration. Manage Products, Customers, Orders, Carts, Coupons, GiftCertificates and more. Use when the user wants to interact with BigCommerce data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix OAuth PKCE "Session not found" or "No code verifier" errors in SPAs after redirect from external auth server. Use when: (1) OAuth callback fails with session/verifier not found despite flow starting correctly, (2) PKCE code_verifier stored in sessionStorage is missing after redirect back from auth server, (3) Error only happens in production or cross-origin redirects, not in local dev. Root cause: sessionStorage is lost when the browser opens a new tab, changes browsing context, or certain browsers clear it during cross-origin navigation. Fix: use localStorage instead (clean up after exchange).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix wildcard subdomain routing for Fastly Compute@Edge services when subdomains resolve but return 500 "Domain Not Found" or empty responses. Use when: (1) TLS subscription "issued" but edge serves default certificate (CN=j.sni-644-default), (2) Fastly domain-v1 create succeeds but subdomain returns 500, (3) Static publisher/PublisherServer returns empty content for subdomain requests, (4) DNS wildcard CNAME resolves to wrong target. Covers TLS configuration SNI endpoint selection (x.sni vs j.sni vs w.sni), DNS trailing dot issues, Fastly domain-v1 activation, and reading from KV store directly when PublisherServer fails for subdomains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create companion Codex workflows from book chapters, reader exercises, prompts, field notes, and teaching material. Use when Codex needs to turn a chapter excerpt, 書籍練習, AI 提示詞, worksheet, or author note into a reusable Skill-style workflow, GitHub-shareable companion artifact, or book link resource for readers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish explicit traceability between formal specifications (preconditions, postconditions, invariants) and verified code components with their correctness proofs. Produce structured Markdown mapping reports showing verification coverage and proof evidence. Use when auditing formal verification, documenting verified systems, establishing traceability for certification, or when the user asks to map specifications to code, generate verification reports, or analyze verification coverage in Coq, Dafny, Isabelle, or other proof assistants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically reduces bug-triggering test cases to minimal form while preserving the failure. Use when debugging with large, complex test cases that need simplification, reproducing bugs with minimal examples, or creating regression tests from verbose failure scenarios. Takes a failing test and systematically removes unnecessary inputs, steps, assertions, and code using delta debugging and other reduction algorithms. Supports unit tests, integration tests, input files, and multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C/C++).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively enhance user requirements into clear, complete, actionable specifications through analysis and clarification. Use when: (1) Users provide initial requirements that need refinement, (2) Requirements are vague, incomplete, or ambiguous, (3) Creating formal specifications from informal descriptions, (4) Identifying missing constraints, edge cases, or acceptance criteria, (5) Clarifying assumptions and implicit dependencies, or (6) Preparing requirements for design, implementation, or verification. Operates interactively: analyze → ask clarifying questions → refine based on responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。