1,280 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a test that can fail. Use whenever adding a test, when a suite is being created for a project that has none, when asked to raise coverage, or before claiming a behaviour is covered. Covers the oracle problem, when to choose the integration suite over the unit one, and how to prove the test is not tautological.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Volume-based PUMP token reward system with day-indexed epochs, pro-rata distribution, accumulator tracking, and cross-program claiming on Solana.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Admin and authority operations for the Pump protocol — set coin creator, update token incentives, set IDL authority, claim cashback, Mayhem mode, and BothPrograms cross-program admin instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get literature into a research run when the plugin fetches nothing — fetch the source yourself with web_fetch / web_search or take a file the person already has, READ it with the pdf_* tools or ocr, then ingest record and text together with rs_cite, bind locators, and cite with [@key]. Use when a run needs sources, when a library export has to come in, when a citation key is unknown, or when a claim cannot be checked against a source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or update stable, canonical, any-human, PMF, and adoption claims using adoption/canonicity governance packets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for authentication or authorization changes involving BFF cookies/tokens, JWT validation, claims/user ID extraction, policies, handler access checks, impersonation, or 401/403 bugs; not for UI affordance gating alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-first Research pipeline with live gates, source/PDF evidence, claim boundaries, compute and publication controls; includes an optional PubMed/arXiv standard-library helper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a purchase order extract (spreadsheet, CSV or pasted table) and returns a DRAFT question sheet for the buyer: possible split orders, round amounts, amounts just under an approval threshold, first-seen or near-duplicate vendors, duplicate orders and missing or self approvals, each a neutral question naming the PO numbers, never a finding. Use when the user asks to "review these purchase orders", "screen the PO log", "spot anomalies in this spend extract", "sanity-check the PO register" or "prepare buyer questions before the audit". Do not use for an expense claim or travel request checked against policy, use expense-policy-precheck instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a DRAFT self-assessment, peer feedback note or manager review narrative from the evidence the writer supplies (goals, examples, metrics, notes), in the review template where given: every sentence tied to a numbered evidence item, unsupported claims removed and logged, and a gaps list to complete before submitting. Never assigns, suggests or implies a rating, score, ranking, pay or promotion outcome. Use when the user asks to "write my self-assessment", "draft peer feedback for a colleague", "turn these notes into a performance review", "help me write the year-end review for my report", "summarise my achievements against my goals" or "draft the mid-year review". Do not use for a job description or role profile, use job-description-drafter instead; for a new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT board paper skeleton from the sponsor's inputs: purpose, recommendation as the sponsor states it, options including do nothing, risks, financials exactly as provided, authority to decide and the decision sought, with every claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so the sponsor sees what still needs support. Use when the user asks to "draft a board paper", "structure the committee paper", "prepare the decision paper for the investment committee", "skeleton the board memo" or "what goes in the paper for the audit committee". Do not use for a pre-read or briefing pack with no resolution sought, use executive-briefing-pack instead; to record a decision already taken in a discussion, use decision-memo-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps every proposed P&ID object from an accepted enrichment draft to the generic family, catalogue class and required attributes the project's intelligent P&ID authoring tool would need, as a readiness table with UNKNOWN wherever the project catalogue extract is not provided, plus connectivity readiness per line and a numbered list of import blockers. Mapping only: it never writes to the tool, never produces an import file and never claims a class exists in the catalogue. Use when the user asks to "build the readiness map", "show how far the draft is from a sandbox import", "list what would block the import", "map the objects to the tool catalogue" or "check attribute readiness against the catalogue extract" after gate G3. Do not use for validating the discipline sections or assembling the review package, use validation-and-review-package instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads an accounts payable exception list (mismatches, possible duplicates, missing or exhausted purchase orders, missing receipts, vendor or bank detail differences) with any invoice, purchase order and receipt data supplied, and returns a DRAFT action sheet: per line, the exception as stated, the facts as read, the difference where both sides exist, one proposed next action for the accounts payable clerk to perform, who or what it needs, and a draft query, with UNKNOWN wherever the data is silent. Use when the user asks to "review these invoice exceptions", "work through the AP exception queue", "what should I do with these blocked invoices", "propose next steps for the three-way match failures" or "sort out the duplicate and missing PO invoices". Do not use for a purchase order log screened for anomalies, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for an expense claim against policy, use expense-policy-precheck. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- End-to-end workflow to establish where and when a photo or video was captured and whether it is authentic — evidentiary handling, metadata extraction, reverse image search for provenance, visual geolocation, chronolocation from shadows, and manipulation… Use when asked to verify where an image was taken, confirm or refute a claimed location or date, or authenticate media before relying on it
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Turn findings into a defensible intelligence product — BLUF key judgements, standardised estimative probability language, per-claim sourcing with timestamps and archived copies, separated observation, inference and assessment,… Use when writing an intelligence report, due-diligence memo, evidence pack or executive summary, or when asked to write up an investigation so it survives challenge
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Registry of reusable agent sessions and slot allocation: claim a free scheduled-task slot instead of creating a new session, set its prompt and fire time, and release it when done. Use when you need to spawn or reuse a visible background session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover a fleet whose machines cannot see each other over the file-sync network: establish ground truth at the hub from the live sync API rather than memory or one peer's claim, publish the hub's verified device id over the messaging rail, and walk each disconnected peer through re-pairing. Triggers: "/raise-sync", "sync is down", "machines cannot see each other".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Geolocate and chronolocate a photo or video from visual evidence alone — plate and phone number formats, road markings, utility poles, bollards, signage typefaces, architecture and vegetation for… Use when asked where or when a picture was taken, to verify a claimed location without GPS or EXIF, or to match a scene against Google Earth, Street View, Yandex Panoramas, Mapillary or KartaView
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Build a sourced, corroborated profile of a named individual from public records, social platforms, professional networks, court and property filings, licensing boards, patents, papers and obituaries — anchoring the name to a… Use when asked to find, identify, background-check or profile a person, verify someone's claimed employment or credentials, or locate a missing or hard-to-reach individual
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies truthfulness, accuracy, and link integrity of content before publishing. Catches fabricated statistics, dead URLs, misattributed sources, and company claims that contradict the brand DNA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan browser, app, screenshot, or UI checks before visual claims. Use when a task includes app shots, visual QA, generated assets, or runtime UI proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, grade, rewrite, and issue funny evidence-backed tickets for generic AI-slop patterns in prose, social posts, UI/design, and code. Use when asked to de-slop writing, humanize AI copy, grade a draft, review a landing page or generated interface, remove vague claims and repetitive rhetoric, inspect AI-written code for generic abstractions and happy-path-only logic, or ticket someone for a specific quality offense. Do not use to determine whether AI authored something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。