1,171 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a single-file industrial-archive product landing page (Nordic museum aesthetic, hash-routed detail pages). Takes a natural-language description of one or more "exhibit-style" products (objects, tools, hardware, watches, kitchenware, lighting, audio, instruments, anything with a designed/forged/restrained quality); outputs ONE working .html file. Visitors see a black-framed cover that flips between exhibits, sidebar index, side meta column (material/origin/year/dimension), and click any exhibit → full detail page (giant italic title, spec table, hero image, lead + 3 prose paragraphs, gallery, prev/next). Runs in BOTH Claude Code (writes to ~/Desktop) and GLM / online chat (outputs HTML inline). Trigger: "做个工业风产品落地页", "做克制之物风格的展品页", "industrial-archive-gen ...", or when user drags this skill folder into chat asking for a product page in the Nordic-industrial archive style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent quality assurance for one SDD Composy task in qa_required: CA coverage, unit/integration/E2E, accessibility, responsiveness, environment, and evidence inventory, producing the QA report and requesting evidence_required. Use when a task finished execution — 'rodar o QA da task', 'testar a TASK-003', 'validar a implementação'. Do NOT use for code review (sdd-review), the final verdict (sdd-verify), or test runs outside an SDD task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify tumor neoantigens from somatic variants with pVACtools (pVACseq/pVACfuse/pVACbind/pVACvector/pVACview) for personalized cancer vaccines and checkpoint biomarkers. Encodes the field's hard truth that binding prediction is the easy, near-solved part and single-digit-percent PPV lives downstream — so it centers clonality/CCF, HLA LOH (the silent invalidator), expression, proximal-variant phasing, agretopicity/foreignness quality, and the predicted->presented->immunogenic validation tiers. Use when nominating vaccine targets, ranking neoantigens, or building a tumor-to-candidate pipeline. Binding details in mhc-binding-prediction; ranking in immunogenicity-scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the full static analysis suite — ruff lint, ruff format check, pyright type check, auth analysis, license headers. Use before committing or to verify code quality after changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
品質管理、不適合調査、根本原因分析、是正措置、サプライヤー品質管理に関する 体系化された専門知識。規制下の製造環境で15年以上の経験を持つ品質エンジニアの 知見に基づく。FDA、IATF 16949、AS9100環境を網羅。NCRライフサイクル管理、 CAPAシステム、SPC解釈、監査方法論を含む。不適合の調査、根本原因分析、 CAPA管理、SPCデータの解釈、サプライヤー品質課題の対応に使用。
Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOLID principles knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP with detection patterns, PHP examples, and antipattern identification. Use for architecture audits and code quality reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinator workflow for orchestrating dockeragents through fix-review-iterate-present loop. Use when delegating any task that produces code changes. Ensures agents achieve 10/10 quality before presenting to human.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。