「contract」の検索結果

Apply risk-based test-driven development to bugs, domain logic, state transitions, parsers, contracts, migrations, and behavior where a failing test sharpens the design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create practical role-specific onboarding checklists with owners, timing, access needs, and first-week milestones. Use for new hire, contractor, client, or team onboarding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage email, Slack, ticket, or shared request backlogs into priority buckets, owners, and next actions. Use when the work is repetitive queue handling, intake cleanup, or response sorting. Do not use for strategic decisions, policy interpretation, or substantive contract review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build customer health scores and churn risk models using leading indicators. Define health dimensions (Usage, Engagement, Support, Sentiment, Contract), weight and score customers, segment into Healthy / At-Risk / Red, and generate intervention playbooks. Use during QBR prep, customer success reviews, or when churn spikes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured legal due diligence for M&A, joint ventures, or investment transactions. Cover all 9 workstreams — Corporate, Contracts, IP, Litigation, Regulatory, Employment, Tax, Environmental, and Data Privacy. Produce a risk matrix with deal-breaker flags and closing conditions. Use when evaluating a target or counterparty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when developing plugins, tools, and extensions for OpenCode v1 - plugin contract, crash-prevention rules, ctx/event APIs, subagent lifecycle (abort races, compaction, orphan detection), MCP integration, testing patterns, or publishing to npm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or reviewing a public API, exported function signature, module boundary, exported type/interface, or any contract other code depends on

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Packaging React components as a consumable library — style delivery contracts, sideEffects, cascade layers, "use client" preservation, peer dependency ranges, server-safe vs client entries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backend specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches API endpoints, database schema, middleware, or auth. Covers endpoint contracts with request/response shapes, error catalogs, auth per endpoint, schema design with constraints and indexes, migration strategy, and middleware pipeline ordering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frontend specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches UI components, forms, client state, or user-facing flows. Covers UI-state completeness (loading, error, empty, success), component boundaries, form validation contracts, state ownership, and measurable UI success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches a command surface, an interactive flow, config precedence, exit codes, or output modes. Covers flag contracts, prompt flow design, precedence tables, exit-code taxonomy, TTY/piped/JSON output, error text, signals, and cross-platform concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches model calls, prompts, retrieval, tool calling, agentic loops, or evals. Covers approach selection, model and provider choice, structured output contracts, loop guards, budgets, failure modes, and eval design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full legal plugin suite for commercial contract review, privacy/DPA analysis, and AI governance vendor reviews. Use when the user invokes /commercial-legal:review, /privacy-legal:dpa-review, /ai-governance-legal:vendor-ai-review, renewal tracking, DSAR responses, or EU AI Act triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Prisma Next structured error envelope and route to the right recovery — code, domain, severity, why, fix, meta. Use for error, exception, my emit failed, my query won't typecheck, my query crashed, my migration won't apply, MIGRATION.HASH_MISMATCH, BUDGET.ROWS_EXCEEDED, BUDGET.TIME_EXCEEDED, RUNTIME.ABORTED, PLAN.HASH_MISMATCH, CONTRACT.MARKER_MISSING, PN-RUN-3001, PN-RUN-3002, PN-RUN-3030, PN-MIG-2001, PN-CLI-4011, PN-SCHEMA-0001, drift, capability missing, planner conflict, prisma studio, EXPLAIN, query log, db.end, db.close, script won't exit, hangs, close connection, pool.end, client is closed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a vague Prisma Next prompt to the right specific skill. Use for "help me with Prisma Next", "what is Prisma Next", "explain Prisma Next", "I'm new to PN", "where do I start", "what can I do with Prisma Next", "what can I do next with Prisma", "just ran createprisma", "tour of Prisma Next", "Prisma Next overview", and comparison questions like "Prisma Next vs Prisma 7", "PN vs Drizzle", "PN vs Kysely", "PN vs TypeORM". Do NOT use when the prompt clearly matches a workflow skill — adoption / quickstart / first-touch orientation / brownfield introspection, schema / contract editing, migration authoring (db update / migration plan / migrate), migration review on deploy / concurrent migrations, queries / db.orm / db.sql / TypedSQL, runtime / db.ts / middleware wiring, build / Vite plugin / Next.js plugin, debug / structured error envelopes / PN-* error codes, or feedback / bug report / feature request — load that sibling skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect or exercise the paused gaia curate orchestration scaffold for one source URL. The command currently persists an INITIALIZED run ledger and reports status; its 25 named workflow states and transition methods are a design skeleton, not an implemented automated curation or merge pipeline. Use only for scaffold development, status inspection, or dry-run contract work. For live curation, use gaia-full-pipeline or gaia-consult. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-quick-curate", "inspect gaia curate", "curate scaffold", "quick curate status". For batch/multi-page runs use gaia-curate-dynamic; for crawler branches use gaia-bot-curate; for pending intake proposals use gaia-draft-curate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route repository-qualified changes across Pulp and Vellum using Pulp's exact ownership projection. Use when a change touches design import, Chromium authoring, DesignIR, visual harness, screenshot, Skia/Dawn, runtime assets, or another path represented by `.github/vellum-ownership.json`; when deciding whether work originates in Pulp or Vellum; or when validating the cross-repository routing contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optional Moonbase license-activation integration for Pulp — load-bearing compile settings, OpenSSL-at-configure caveat, the moonbase-pulp User-Agent contract, audio-thread gating + click-free fade, async start/pump, the interactive native (no-WebView) activation editor (frame-tick polling + the don't-rebuild-mid-event trap), loadable plugin/standalone formats, and headless screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews YUP audio plugin code for YUP-specific correctness issues: AudioProcessor lifecycle, AudioParameterBuilder and AudioParameterHandle usage, editor gestures, AudioBusLayout handling, CLAP/VST3 wrapper contracts, state recall, and MIDI safety. Use when the user asks to review a YUP plugin, check a processBlock, audit parameter smoothing, or asks "is this YUP code safe?". Trigger when you see yup::AudioProcessor, yup_audio_plugin, AudioParameterBuilder, AudioParameterHandle, AudioProcessorEditor, or createPluginProcessor in the code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity UI/UX pattern design-to-code translation. Screen flow architecture, View/ViewModel separation, HUD architecture, feedback & juice systems, dynamic list/grid views, transition & animation contracts. UI Toolkit only. DESIGN INTENT format: INTENT/WRONG/RIGHT/SCAFFOLD/DESIGN HOOK. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity level design-to-code translation. Trigger & event architecture, encounter design contracts, checkpoint & respawn, cinematic & scripted sequences, environmental storytelling hooks, level streaming & loading seams. DESIGN INTENT format: INTENT/WRONG/RIGHT/SCAFFOLD/ DESIGN HOOK. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing new observable frontend behavior or fixing a behavior-changing bug where a failing test can describe the missing or incorrect behavior first. Apply to components, hooks/composables, utilities, API clients, route guards, or user workflows; pure behavior-preserving refactoring uses an already-green contract instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tend the Allium garden. Use when the user wants to write, edit, update, add to, improve, clarify, refine, restructure, fix or migrate Allium specs. Covers adding entities, rules, triggers, surfaces and contracts, fixing syntax or validation errors, renaming or refactoring within specs, migrating specs to a new language version, and translating requirements into well-formed specifications. Pushes back on vague requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。