「database」の検索結果

Query cBioPortal for cancer genomics data exploration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatic access to biological web services and databases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fullstack development toolkit with project scaffolding for Next.js/FastAPI/MERN/Django stacks and code quality analysis. Use when scaffolding new projects, analyzing codebase quality, or implementing fullstack architecture patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SaaS boilerplate with auth, database schemas, Stripe billing, multi-tenancy, API routes, and dashboard UI on a Next.js/TypeScript/Tailwind stack. Use when starting a new SaaS product, subscription app, or multi-tenant platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System architecture design and review. Use when designing architecture, evaluating microservices vs monolith, writing ADRs, choosing a database, planning for scalability, reviewing system design, or generating architecture diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans zero-downtime migrations with compatibility validation, rollback strategies, and phased execution plans. Use when migrating databases, APIs, infrastructure, or services between platforms or versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design RAG pipelines: chunking, retrieval evaluation, and architecture. Use when building a RAG system, selecting a chunking strategy, choosing a vector database, optimizing retrieval quality, or evaluating with RAGAS metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design relational schemas from requirements with normalization, migrations, ERDs, RLS policies, and indexes for PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. Use when designing new features, reviewing schemas, or adding multi-tenancy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a skill that determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) or pro-alleged-infringer (contesting work status or originality via the four exclusion grounds — technical function, rule-dictated outcome, sweat of the brow, idea/functionality). It includes sector-specific modules for photography, software/GUI, sporting events, databases, applied art, functional texts, derivative works/critical editions, and multimedia works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library - methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master advanced AgentDB features including QUIC synchronization, multi-database management, custom distance metrics, hybrid search, and distributed systems integration. Use when building distributed AI systems, multi-agent coordination, or advanced vector search applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ProteoDisco is an R package to facilitate proteogenomics studies. It houses functions to create customized (variant) protein databases based on user-submitted genomic variants, splice-junctions, fusion genes and manual transcript sequences. The flexible workflow can be adopted to suit a myriad of research and experimental settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SimBu can be used to simulate bulk RNA-seq datasets with known cell type fractions. You can either use your own single-cell study for the simulation or the sfaira database. Different pre-defined simulation scenarios exist, as are options to run custom simulations. Additionally, expression values can be adapted by adding an mRNA bias, which produces more biologically relevant simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

InterCellar is implemented as an R/Bioconductor Package containing a Shiny app that allows users to interactively analyze cell-cell communication from scRNA-seq data. Starting from precomputed ligand-receptor interactions, InterCellar provides filtering options, annotations and multiple visualizations to explore clusters, genes and functions. Finally, based on functional annotation from Gene Ontology and pathway databases, InterCellar implements data-driven analyses to investigate cell-cell comm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This tool fetches microarray data directly from GEO database, based on the GEOQuery R package. Given a GSE accession ID, it returns an Rdata object containing the data and a text file (.cond file) summarizing the conditions of the experimen

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ASURAT is a software for single-cell data analysis. Using ASURAT, one can simultaneously perform unsupervised clustering and biological interpretation in terms of cell type, disease, biological process, and signaling pathway activity. Inputting a single-cell RNA-seq data and knowledge-based databases, such as Cell Ontology, Gene Ontology, KEGG, etc., ASURAT transforms gene expression tables into original multivariate tables, termed sign-by-sample matrices (SSMs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect new gene expression profile with the relevant information from the existing databases, such as previous publications, MeSH terms, and gene sets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mass spectrometry (MS) data backend supporting import and export of MS/MS library spectra from MassBank record files. Different backends are available that allow handling of data in plain MassBank text file format or allow also to interact directly with MassBank SQL databases. Objects from this package are supposed to be used with the Spectra Bioconductor package. This package thus adds MassBank support to the Spectra package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides utilities for identifying drug-target interactions for sets of small molecule or gene/protein identifiers. The required drug-target interaction information is obained from a local SQLite instance of the ChEMBL database. ChEMBL has been chosen for this purpose, because it provides one of the most comprehensive and best annotatated knowledge resources for drug-target information available in the public domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。