「gate」の検索結果

Deep-research a topic end to end and produce a permanent, reusable knowledge asset: archive every primary source verbatim (gated by the user's privacy/retention posture), write one 1:1 summary per source, then synthesize a single self-contained compendium page. Depth is a dial (base synthesis → grounded primaries → books + counter-canon → saturation), each level an idempotent superset of the one below. Distinct from data-research (structured trackers) and perplexity-research (web deltas): this produces prose knowledge synthesis backed by an archived source corpus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route content to specialized ingestion skills. Detects input type and delegates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate via second model. Spawn a different AI model to review work before committing. Includes refusal routing: if one model refuses, switch silently to the next. Extended in v0.25.1 with structured review-mode gating (when to invoke vs not) and a Codex code-review handoff for the diff-review case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schedule management with staggering, quiet hours, and wake-up override. Validates schedules, prevents collisions, and gates delivery during quiet hours.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filing gate for ALL brain writes. Consulted before creating any new brain page to determine the correct path. Reads the ACTIVE schema pack via `gbrain schema show --json` — no hardcoded directory table. Also runs periodic taxonomy drift detection via `gbrain schema review-orphans`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a sanitized shared team/company brain from a personal brain. Strips internal ratings, compensation, performance assessments, retention and political dynamics from pages, takes, and facts across the full scan scope (people, companies, meetings, dailies, cross-references — not just people/), verifies with grep + retrieval passes, and purges sensitive git history behind the data-loss-gate confirmation card. Also runs as a report-only re-audit on an existing shared brain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deduplicate and synthesize raw concept stubs into a tiered intellectual map (T1 Canon to T4 Riff), tracing idea evolution across sources over time. Transforms thousands of raw concept pages into a curated intellectual fingerprint. Includes a reversible curation cull pass (Phase 5) with hard keep/delete/merge verdicts, substance gates, grounding labels, cluster budgets, and merge-with-backlinks salience promotion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic claim-by-claim verification for any content before it ships. Modeled on professional fact-checking desks (The New Yorker, ProPublica, IFCN standards): extract every verifiable claim, check each against live citable sources (never training data), assign a 6-level confidence status, apply corrections, and produce a scored pass/fail report. Includes a data-derived-claims gate for outputs produced FROM the brain or a database: PRODUCER ≠ VERIFIER (re-derive each claim via a different query path) and AFFILIATION ≠ AUTHORSHIP (person→thing claims resolve through typed edges), with delivery hard-blocked on unsupported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest links, articles, tweets, and ideas into the brain. Fetch content, save to brain with analysis, credit the author (people page only when they pass the notability gate), and cross-link. Use when the user shares a link or says "read this", "save this", "think about this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Everything In Its Right Place. The universal post-work organizer. After any significant work session, EIIRP runs a 7-phase audit: (1) inventory every output, (2) walk taxonomy to decide where each lands, (3) check schema-pack consistency against the brain's actual shape, (4) file enriched brain pages, (5) audit the skill graph for DRY+MECE, (6) verify resolvability, (7) report. Named after the Radiohead song. Nothing produced during significant work lives only in chat — knowledge becomes permanent, patterns become reusable. Also carries the always-on auto-fire gate: when >=500 words of structured analysis on a user-shared document is about to be delivered, file the brain page first, then deliver the analysis with the link in that same reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for 9Router — local/remote AI gateway with OpenAI-compatible REST for chat, image, TTS, embeddings, web search, web fetch. Use when the user mentions 9Router, NINEROUTER_URL, or wants AI without writing provider boilerplate. This skill covers setup + indexes capability skills; fetch the relevant capability SKILL.md from the URLs below when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate the Composio SDK monorepo, branch and PR workflow, repo layout, generated-file boundaries, changesets, and shared maintenance rules. Use when work spans multiple packages, when deciding where code belongs, when preparing a PR, or when the user asks about repository conventions rather than a specific SDK implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation via agent-browser CLI. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, fill forms, click buttons, take screenshots, extract data, or test web apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure, extend, debug, or contribute to PicoClaw itself. Use when the task is about PicoClaw CLI commands, config.json, gateway, auth, models, skills, MCP servers, cron, routing, sessions, self-evolution, built-in slash commands, or repository internals. Use PicoClaw-native workflows, terminology, paths, and configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watches what customers are saying in public and in private, then does something about it. Aggregates Google, Yelp, and Facebook reviews alongside disputes, tickets, and email into themes backed by verbatim quotes; drafts a reply to every review in the owner's own voice for approval; spots customers who have gone quiet or look likely to leave; and drafts win-back offers for the ones worth keeping. With Shopify connected, order and fulfillment patterns become a sentiment signal too. Works from pasted or exported reviews when nothing is connected. Use this whenever the owner asks about reviews, ratings, reputation, complaints, or repeat business — including "what are people saying about us," "did we get any bad reviews," "how do I respond to this one-star," "our rating dropped," "which customers have gone quiet," "who hasn't ordered in a while," "how do I win them back," or "are customers happy."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gets Claude talking to a tool nobody built an official connector for. Works out what the system is, checks the Claude connector directory for an existing connector first, and when there isn't one connects the tool through Zapier — never by hand-building against a raw API — with credentials handled safely and approval gates on anything that writes. This is what turns "my ERP isn't supported" into an afternoon. Use this whenever the owner names a tool that isn't connected — including phrasings like "can you connect to my," "make my tools talk to each other," "there's no API for this," "pull data out of my field service software," "I use ServiceTrade and it's not on the list," or "is there any way to get at this data." Reach for it whenever an unsupported system is blocking something else.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the diagnosis, and return a concise briefing with a verdict and fix direction. Use for triage, root-cause analysis, or re-investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to run a sandboxed deep verification of a qwen-code PR — "/verify-pr <n>", "深度验证这个 PR", A/B load-bearing proof against the base build, mock-free harnesses with wire oracles, and targeted gates — producing tmp/pr<n>-verify-<ts>/report.md plus a machine-readable verdict. Designed for the token-free CI verify job; also usable locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for briefing a subagent or a fork — what to put in the prompt, what not to delegate, and a worked example. Load before writing a delegation prompt; the Agent tool's own description carries the launch rules and the background-agent rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a bug from a GitHub issue, following the reproduce-first workflow. Use when the user asks to fix a bug, investigate a GitHub issue, or debug a user-reported problem. Takes a GitHub issue URL or number as input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。