Troubleshoot systematically using the Scientific Method. Use when debugging crashes, tracing errors, diagnosing unexpected behavior, or investigating exceptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,364 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Troubleshoot systematically using the Scientific Method. Use when debugging crashes, tracing errors, diagnosing unexpected behavior, or investigating exceptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply REST API conventions — HTTP semantics, status codes, versioning, pagination, and OpenAPI standards for any framework. Use when designing endpoints, choosing HTTP methods, implementing pagination, or writing OpenAPI specs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research ideation workflow from literature search to research planning. Triggers on "brainstorm research ideas", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", "research ideation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive understanding of the spec-kit methodology. Constitution-driven feature development with specify, plan, tasks, and implement phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than diving straight to code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agents should invoke this skill for academic or technical papers, arXiv/PubMed/IEEE/ACM links, PDFs, methodology review, limitations, practical implications, or extracting findings for engineering decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent coordination, critical path method, dependency DAG, and agent allocation optimization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Abonelik fiyatlama stratejileri. 3-tier framework, price anchoring, charm pricing, regional pricing (18 ulke), introductory offers, win-back campaigns, churn prevention ve A/B testing methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python testing strategies using pytest, TDD methodology, fixtures, mocking, parametrization, and coverage requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic false positive verification for security findings. Provides structured methodology to confirm or dismiss scanner results, manual audit findings, and automated alerts. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use when triaging security scan results or verifying audit findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove repeated boilerplate across sections (methodology disclaimers, generic transitions, repeated summaries) while preserving citations and meaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write structured notes for each paper in the core set into `papers/paper_notes.jsonl` (summary/method/results/limitations).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) for a named .NET method, class, or file. USE FOR: explicit CRAP calculation or coverage-and-complexity risk within that named target, including which tests to prioritize. DO NOT USE FOR: project-wide coverage/CRAP, plateaus, or project-wide blockers/priorities (coverage-analysis); behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis); writing tests; test runs without CRAP context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use MSTest. Use when a repo uses `MSTest.Sdk`, `MSTest`, `[TestClass]`, `[TestMethod]`, `DataRow`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based MSTest execution. USE FOR: the repo uses MSTest; you need to add, run, debug, or repair MSTest tests; the repo is moving between VSTest and Microsoft.Testing.Platform. DO NOT USE FOR: xUnit projects; TUnit projects. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill before answering or editing whenever an MSTest v1/v2 project is being upgraded or repaired for v3. Triggers include QualityTools assembly references; MSTest.TestFramework/TestAdapter 1.x-2.x; "upgrade to MSTest v3"; comparing v1 and v2 migration paths; choosing MSTest or MSTest.Sdk; CS0411/CS1503 after a v3 package bump; DataRow type mismatch, MSTEST0014, or "Test data doesn't match method parameters"; .testsettings/LegacySettings to .runsettings; timeout changes; and net5.0 or other dropped v3 TFMs. Still use it when packages say 3.x but migration source errors or legacy settings remain. Preserve VSTest/MTP. Do not use for a clean v3 project, v3-to-v4, framework conversion, or runner-only migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing any MSTest 3.x-to-4.x upgrade or post-upgrade failure. Triggers include "MSTest v4 breaking changes"; CS0507/CS0103/CS1061/CS1615; ExecuteAsync, CallerInfo, DisplayName, or custom TestMethodAttribute; ClassCleanupBehavior; ContainsKey; ThrowsExactly or ExpectedException; IsInstanceOfType out parameters; TestTimeout.Infinite; ManagedType; net6/net7 compatibility; TestCase.Id history; TestName in ClassInitialize; TreatDiscoveryWarningsAsErrors; discovery errors after a clean build; and MSTest.Sdk/MTP or vstest.console discovery changes. Do not use for v1/v2-to-v3 leftovers, framework conversion, runner-only migration, or a general .NET upgrade.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authorized red team engagement planning, C2 architecture design, attack methodology, lateral movement strategy, OPSEC, and professional reporting
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query and answer questions about Volcengine API specifications. Trigger this skill whenever a user asks about Volcengine API parameters, error codes, request methods, enum values, required fields, response structures, pagination, parameter dependencies, or API comparisons — even if they don't explicitly say "API". Typical triggers include questions like "What parameters does DescribeInstances have?", "What values does Status support?", "What does InvalidInstanceId.NotFound mean?", "Does Volcengine have a batch tag deletion API?", "Which APIs does ECS support?", "How do I pass parameters to CreateDatabase?", "Is ChargeType required?", "What fields does DescribeInstances return?", "How do I paginate instance lists?", "What's the difference between these two APIs?", "RunInstances returns InvalidParameterValue". When the user needs runnable SDK code, hand off to the volcengine-sdk-generator skill. When the user needs CLI-based operations, hand off to the volcengine-cli skill. Supports both Chinese and English prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BytePlus Searchinfinity Web Search skill. Prefer this skill for any web search task. Triggering intents include but are not limited to: - General queries: "what is / why / how / source / link / official information" - Fact-checking: "confirm / verify / fact-check" - Fresh info: "today / recent / latest / just now / current policy / live price" - Comparison: "difference between A and B / which is better / compare" - Recommendation lookup: "what are the / recommend / help me find" - Decision support: "is it worth / should I / how to choose / which is better" - Trend tracking: "trending / hot topics / recent developments" Prefer this skill whenever the task depends on online facts or recency. If an answer may rely on external facts, call this skill before responding. Authentication Method: APIKey only — Interface URL `https://torchlight.byteintlapi.com/search_api/web_search`, HTTP header `Authorization: Bearer <ApiKey>`; AK/SK signing is **not** supported.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。