「repo」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "generate an SEO report", "出月报", "set SEO alerts", or "排名掉了提醒我"; two modes — report builds multi-metric traffic/ranking/authority/content dashboards, and alert configures threshold notifications for future ranking, traffic, technical, backlink, competitor, and AI-visibility changes. Not for raw position-by-position deltas — use rank-tracker. SEO报告/绩效仪表盘/SEO预警/排名监控

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze backlinks", "analyze my off-site signals", or "track AI traffic / ChatGPT / Perplexity referrals"; profiles referring domains, anchor-text mix, toxic links, and disavow candidates (backlinks mode) or isolates AI-assistant referral sessions in GA4/GSC/logs and reports their trend, landing pages, and AI-vs-organic conversion (ai-referrals mode). Not for internal links — use site-structure-optimizer; not for keyword positions — use rank-tracker; not for multi-metric stakeholder reports — use performance-monitor. 外链分析/反向链接/AI流量/AI引荐/ChatGPT流量/AI转化

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track rankings" or "查排名"; measures keyword and SERP-position deltas over time from provided exports or connected tools, including AI-response checks. Not for multi-metric stakeholder reports or setting alerts — use performance-monitor (report or alert mode). 排名追踪/SERP监控

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "calculate influencer ROI", "prove campaign value", or "what was our ROAS"; produces direct ROI/ROAS, earned media value, attribution-modeled revenue, LTV-based ROI, and a stakeholder-ready summary. Not for building the full slide/written report — use report-generator. 达人营销ROI计算/投资回报测算

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Communicate design's contribution to business and user outcomes in stakeholder language. Use when reporting results upward. For choosing the metrics in the first place, use `metrics-definition` (ux-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across teams. Use when the same research keeps getting redone. For synthesising one study, use `affinity-diagram`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a user-reported defect as a durable GitHub issue written in the project's own domain language. Explores the codebase in parallel for context but never leaks file paths or line numbers into the issue. Use when the user reports a bug conversationally, runs a QA pass, or says "file an issue", "log this as a bug", "capture this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull AWS Security Agent findings (penetration tests and code reviews) and drive remediation. Use this whenever the user mentions Security Agent, security findings, pentest or penetration test results, code review findings, vulnerabilities found in their AWS account, "what did the security scan find", remediating or triaging security risks, or wants to start fixing reported vulnerabilities — even if they don't name the service explicitly. Trigger it for phrases like "get my security findings", "what vulnerabilities do we have", "let's fix the pentest results", or "triage the security report". The skill discovers scans, exports findings to a gitignored local directory (so sensitive exploit detail is never committed), produces a prioritized triage summary, and offers to start fixing the highest-risk issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for anything related to EAS Observe - adding `expo-observe` to an Expo project (AppMetricsRoot/ObserveRoot HOC, markInteractive and ObserveInteractiveMarker, the useObserve hook, the Expo Router / React Navigation integrations for per-route metrics, user-defined events via `Observe.logEvent`, error reporting via ObserveErrorBoundary and `Observe.reportError`, and runtime config such as sampleRate and dispatchInDebug), querying via the EAS CLI (`eas observe:metrics-summary`, `observe:metrics`, `observe:routes`, `observe:events`, `observe:session`, `observe:versions`), interpreting the resulting metrics (cold/warm launch, TTR, TTI, navigation cold/warm TTR, update download, and the TTI frameRate/device/network params for triaging slow startups), or shipping an Observe integration inside a third-party package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute this skill should be used when the user asks about "SPAWN REQUEST format", "agent reports", "agent coordination", "parallel agents", "report format", "agent communication", or needs to understand how agents coordinate within the sprint system. Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skillshare change before it becomes a pull request, or review an open pull request. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: review a diff, branch, commit range or PR, check a change before opening a PR, run a pre-Codex review, or find what a change missed. It checks correctness, the repository's documented rules, the originating issue or spec, every consumer of a changed concept, and cleanup (reuse, simplification, efficiency, depth of fix), then verifies each finding against the code before reporting it. Read-only unless the user asks for fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides authoring, organizing, and referencing test fixtures in this repo. Use when creating new fixtures, writing tests that depend on fixtures, or deciding what should be checked into git. Engine fixtures (rendering corpora) live in the engine repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to think about names in the Grida repo — not conventions, but what a name commits you to, reveals about the system, and costs to change. The central discipline is that a strict, honest name refuses to grow, and that refusal drives the repo's shape (flat modules, small agnostic packages, suffix siblings). Use when planning a new package, crate, module, directory, route group, or test corpus — the name comes first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a repo-specific orientation.md resource for the learning-opportunities skill. Invoke directly when the user asks for repo orientation; do not trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a source-linked briefing for the latest published GitHub release of a public repository. Use for engineering teams tracking a dependency release; do not use it to publish releases or change repositories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cleans a weekly CRM export and produces a regional sales summary. Activates when the user asks to clean a CRM export, deduplicate sales rows, calculate regional totals, or generate a weekly sales report from a CSV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize deep research results into markdown report, cover all fields, skip uncertain values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A step-by-step problem-solving loop (classify the ask, define done, gather evidence, decide, act surgically, verify by observation, report outcome-first). Use when the user says "/fable-method", "use the fable method", or "approach this like Fable", or proactively when starting any multi-step task that no task-specific skill covers. Subcommands - plan (stop after the plan), audit (grade finished work against the loop), report (rewrite an answer outcome-first).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a deterministic inspection of a WordPress repository (plugin/theme/block theme/WP core/Gutenberg/full site) including tooling/tests/version hints, and a structured JSON report to guide workflows and guardrails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit external compatibility between two DSH (DeepSeek Harness) versions and detect reverts, producing an upgrade-report directory; compares git tags with a source checkout, or published npm packages without one. Use whenever the user asks to check/compare/audit two DSH versions or whether upgrading is safe — e.g. "more changes or reverts in dsh-vX -> dsh-vY", "compare the breaking changes" — even with only two version numbers and no source location. Read-only outside the report directory; npm mode installs in isolation with --ignore-scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up, audits, and reports on marketing measurement — tracking plans, event schemas, attribution models, and the dashboards built on them. Use this to instrument a site or product, audit tracking nobody trusts, choose or interpret an attribution model, build reporting that answers a specific question, or reconcile numbers that disagree between tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。