「report」の検索結果

Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response leadership, and board-level security reporting. Use when building security programs, justifying security budget, selecting compliance frameworks, managing incidents, assessing vendor risk, or when user mentions CISO, security strategy, compliance roadmap, zero trust, or board security reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a bug or regression is reported, the FIRST step — before fixing — is to research how and when it was introduced (git archaeology), then record that finding on the tracking issue/PR. Use the moment a bug, error, broken build, or "this used to work" is reported, before writing a fix. Produces a first-bad-commit (or "not a code regression") note you paste onto the issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spec-drift issue が起票され diff トリアージが必要なとき、C11 が再構成した issue 単位の完全 diff を hunk 化し name/type/required/enum/semantics 各軸の影響を before/after/evidence 付きで判定して triage-report を出したいときに使う。

Turn surviving mutants into better tests, or into bug reports. Use when a mutation run reports escaped mutants, when the MSI gate fails, when asked whether a test suite is actually testing anything, or before proposing to lower a threshold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds SOC performance metrics and KPI tracking dashboards measuring Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), alert quality ratios, analyst productivity, and detection coverage using SIEM data. Use when SOC leadership needs operational visibility, continuous improvement tracking, or executive-level reporting on security operations effectiveness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

herdr 上で稼働中のエージェントレーン（別 pane の claude 等）を親として操縦・監視・承認代行するときに必ず使用する。トリガー: 「レーンを見て」「ワーカーに指示して」「承認待ちを捌いて」「レーンの完了を検証して」「境界を広げて」の依頼、`[lane-ops:report ...]` 形式の報告が会話に届いたとき、herdr レーンの blocked 対応・報告の裏取り・指示送信・タスク境界の拡張が必要になったとき — スキル名や herdr が名指しされていなくても発火する。HERDR_ENV=1 必須。

ネットワーク品質を総合的に診断し、ボトルネックの特定と根本原因の深堀りまで行うスキル。 接続情報、レイテンシ、ダウンロード速度、HTTP接続タイミング、経路解析を自動実行し、 品質閾値に基づく総合評価を日本語レポートとして出力する。 外部依存なし（OS標準ツールのみ使用）、macOSおよびLinux対応。 Use when diagnosing network quality, troubleshooting slow connections, identifying network bottlenecks, measuring latency/bandwidth/jitter, or generating network health reports. 「ネットワーク診断」「network diagnostics」「ネットワークが遅い」 「latency check」「bandwidth test」「traceroute analysis」

Professional project management skill aligned with PMBOK® 6th/7th Edition standards. Use this skill when you need to define requirements (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148), review project plans, generate progress reports with Earned Value Management (EVM), conduct risk analysis, estimate costs, or provide project health assessments. Ideal for creating comprehensive project documentation, analyzing project performance metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC), managing risks across 14 categories, and ensuring stakeholder alignment. Triggers: "create project plan", "analyze project health", "calculate EVM", "risk assessment", "requirements definition", "progress report", "cost estimation", or requests involving PMBOK knowledge areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Markdown documents to PDF. Two modes available — (1) Playwright-based conversion with Mermaid diagram support for technical documentation, and (2) fpdf2-based professional PDF generation with cover pages, themed styling, and business-quality table formatting for estimates, proposals, and reports. Use this skill when converting Markdown to PDF, generating business documents from Markdown, or converting Mermaid diagrams to images. Triggers on short phrases like "PDFに変換して", "markdownをpdfにして", "PDFにして", "PDF化して", "PDF出力して", "convert to PDF", "make a PDF", or any request involving converting content to PDF format.

Generate strategic-consultant-grade meeting minutes from transcripts or notes in Japanese OR English (matching the source language), then run a self-review loop (max 3 iterations) that checks for internal contradictions, action-item omissions, speaker-name errors, and date/day-of-week mistakes before reporting completion. Use this skill whenever the user asks to draft meeting minutes, summarize a transcript, or document a meeting discussion — including Japanese-language transcripts (議事録 / 会議メモ / 文字起こし) and English-language transcripts.

システムログを分析してエラーの根本原因を特定し、段階的に深堀りしていくデバッグ専門家スキル。 アプリケーションログ、システムログ、クラウドサービスログなど様々な形式に対応。 5 Whys、タイムライン分析、Fishbone分析などのRCA（根本原因分析）手法を用いて 問題の本質を突き止め、再発防止策まで提案する。 Use when analyzing system logs to find error root causes, debugging application issues, or performing technical post-mortem analysis with log data. For organizational incident management processes (post-incident review, corrective action plans, incident reports without log data), use incident-rca-specialist instead. Triggers: "analyze this log", "find the root cause", "debug this error", "why is this failing", "log analysis", "what caused this crash", "troubleshoot this issue"

エラーや例外シナリオを顧客体験(CX)の観点で体系的に分析し、改善優先度を付ける スキル。6軸評価（影響度・頻度・復旧容易性・メッセージ品質・感情的影響・ ビジネスコスト）でスコアリングし、Impact vs Effort マトリクスで改善施策を 優先順位付けする。Use when analyzing error scenarios from customer experience perspective, evaluating error message quality, prioritizing error UX improvements, or creating CX-focused error analysis reports. Triggers: "CXエラー分析", "error experience", "エラーUX改善", "customer experience error", "エラーメッセージ品質", "error scenario analysis", "顧客体験エラー評価"

変更が波及する全モジュール・全フローを特定し、集計ルール、状態遷移、符号反転、 コピペ差分、表示/帳票/APIの整合性を監査するスキル。Impact Mapで変更核から 影響範囲を可視化し、Consistency Matrixで横断整合を検証し、Copy Propagation Review戦略でコピペ実装を効率的にレビューする。 Use when one change affects multiple modules, reports, flows, or copied implementations. Audits aggregation totals, state transitions, sign inversion, and cross-module consistency.

インシデント発生後の振り返りと根本原因分析を体系的に実施するスキル。 ログファイル解析や技術デバッグが必要な場合は log-debugger を使用すること。 本スキルはインシデント管理プロセス（タイムライン構築、影響評価、 是正措置計画、再発防止策）に特化する。ログデータの分析ではなく、 組織的な振り返りプロセスと是正措置の策定が主目的である。 Use when conducting post-incident reviews without log analysis, creating corrective action plans, or performing organizational root cause analysis focused on process improvement. NOT for log file debugging. Triggers: "post-incident review", "corrective action plan", "incident report作成", "再発防止策", "RCAレポート", "是正措置", "インシデント振り返り"

Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal audit support skill aligned with IIA (Institute of Internal Auditors) International Standards. Provides risk-based audit planning, audit program development, workpaper documentation, finding development (Condition/Criteria/Cause/Effect), and Corrective Action Request (CAR) tracking. Use when: planning annual/quarterly audits, creating risk assessment matrices, developing audit programs and test procedures, documenting audit workpapers, writing audit findings and reports, tracking corrective actions and follow-ups, preparing for external audits (SOX, ISO). Triggers: "internal audit", "audit plan", "audit program", "audit workpaper", "audit finding", "risk assessment", "CAR tracking", "corrective action", "IIA Standards", "COSO framework", "監査計画", "監査プログラム", "監査調書", "是正措置", "リスク評価".

Export Codex rollout/session JSONL as a self-contained HTML report that can be opened offline. Use when a user provides a complete session file path or Codex session ID, or asks to export a Codex session to HTML, generate a session report, or convert a rollout to HTML. Supports exact full-ID lookup in the CODEX_HOME sessions and archived_sessions directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstructed reference notes on EU and UK medical-device software, built from six sources captured 2026-10-13: MDCG 2019-11 rev.1 (June 2025), MDCG 2020-6 (April 2020), MDCG 2020-13 (July 2020), MDCG 2020-7 (April 2020), MDCG 2020-8 (April 2020), and the MHRA software-applications guidance (2023-07-01) with its stand-alone software PDF. Use for SaMD qualification and classification, legacy-device clinical evidence, the clinical evaluation assessment report, the PMCF plan, and the PMCF evaluation report, under EU MDCG guidance or UK MHRA guidance. SCOPE LIMITS: EU MDR and UK MHRA device software only; no IEC 62304, ISO 13485, or ISO 14971 text; no MDR or IVDR regulation body text; MDCG guidance is not legally binding; MHRA guidance is UK-specific; synthesized notes, not legal advice. LICENCE: Per-document: European Commission reuse policy (Decision 2011/833/EU, CC BY 4.0, attribution and indication of changes) for the MDCG documents; Open Government Licence v3.0 for the MHRA guidance; reconstructed notes with attribution; official PDFs not redistributed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/gwas/reporting. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory docs/archive/historical_reports. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document requirements analysis: Analyzes concept and requirements documents in the docs/ folder, checks requirements against current code, and creates a consolidated difference report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。