「rev」の検索結果

Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging. This is NOT a general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Use this skill when reviewing a small set of changes locally (such as unstaged diff), when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev quality review, or when the user wants a critique of a specific file or function.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR size-based review depth, performance review checklist, architecture conformance checks, and framework-specific review patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a focused STRIDE-based security review using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the user asks for a full security audit, repository security review, weekly security scan, PR security review with deeper validation, or wants dependency CVEs and threat-model context combined into one workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze user-provided reference images and reverse-engineer high-fidelity AI image-generation prompts. Use when the user asks to recreate, imitate, reverse-engineer, or extract prompts from photographs, illustrations, 3D renders, products, characters, landscapes, typography, logos, posters, or other visual references. Do not use for requests that only require OCR or an ordinary image description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and update NuGet package families using ManagedCode NuGetPackageManager, the nuget-manager CLI, or its VS Code extension. USE FOR: checking outdated packages; dry-run family reviews; applying reviewed literal package and explicit project SDK version updates. DO NOT USE FOR: adding/removing packages; dependency graph resolution; authenticated private-feed setup. INVOKES: inspect declarations, preview and review exact versions, apply authorized changes, then restore and run focused regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render an interactive, self-contained HTML companion for a GEO content brief (04-content-brief) or a publish-ready draft (05-production), so a NON-technical client reviewer (founder, organizer staff, the domain expert filling slots) can fill REQUIRED-FILL slots, leave section-level comments, and approve/return work in the browser instead of editing Markdown. Use when a brief or draft needs to go to a client/expert for review, or when building the briefs/index.html entry page for a client folder. The reviewer's input comes back as a JSON file that 04-content-brief Step 9 ingests. Visual quality is delegated to the frontend-design skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a product quality review on a journey, feature, landing page, onboarding flow, or AI/agent surface and returns a friction log, a scored critical-journey review, and a taste bar your team can calibrate against. Use when someone asks is this good enough to ship, how polished should it be, why do users bounce, what is our quality bar, how do we build taste, or to review a design, prototype, onboarding, or checkout. Draws on 264 insights from 100 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Katie Dill, Dylan Field and Stewart Butterfield.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review: systematic single-file, parallel multi-reviewer, full-repo audit, PR diff review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer. Use when asked to review code, PRs, or plan a code review task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit application source code against the OWASP Top 10 (2021) vulnerability categories — broken access control, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design, security misconfiguration, vulnerable components, authentication failures, data integrity, logging failures, SSRF. Use when the user mentions 'OWASP,' 'OWASP Top 10,' 'security audit,' 'security review,' 'secure code review,' 'code security review,' 'vulnerability audit,' 'find vulnerabilities,' 'appsec review,' 'application security audit,' 'check for security issues,' 'broken access control,' 'IDOR,' 'SQL injection,' 'XSS,' 'SSRF,' or wants to check their codebase for common security weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to anticipate reviewer questions, select the strongest ablations to present, prepare rebuttals, or identify paper weaknesses before submission. Triggers on phrases like "reviewer questions", "anticipate reviewers", "rebuttal", "paper weaknesses", "defend the paper", or "strengthen the paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a multi-agent review of changed files for scope, reuse, quality, efficiency, clarity, and altitude issues followed by fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and summarize review feedback and conversation from a GitHub PR (unresolved review threads, review bodies, and PR conversation comments) without making changes. Use when the user asks to "fetch PR comments", "show PR comments", "check PR for unresolved comments", "list review comments", "what comments are on the PR", "show unresolved threads", or "summarize PR feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially review something just built — presume it is broken and find where. Use after implementing a feature, finishing a build, or before shipping, or whenever ATLAS or Boss wants a hostile second opinion on a diff, a running app, or a whole codebase. Spawns clean-context reviewers with opposing lenses (correctness, security, empty-world) and reproduces every finding by running the target before believing it. Distinct from /code-review, which statically reads a diff and never runs the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, diagnose, and improve IEEE rebuttals, revision plans, cover letters, response letters, and point-by-point replies using routed reviewer-comment handling. Use when responding to IEEE reviewer or editor comments about novelty, scope, method, experiments, baselines, figures, tables, citations, writing, LaTeX formatting, limitations, compliance, technical correctness, or reviewer comments that appear generic, contradictory, unsupported, careless, or possibly AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report how many problems the two brains found: mutual review (the other model checks the work, from the peer-review records) and self-check (an agent finds its own error in its own conversation, judged by that agent's own model), side by side. Use when the owner asks whether the second agent or the reviews are worth it, or wants the week's review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user needs to perform year-end closing adjustments (決算整理), review financial statements (決算書), compute depreciation, or review their trial balance. Trigger phrases include: "決算", "決算整理", "決算書を作る", "減価償却", "試算表", "残高試算表", "損益計算書", "貸借対照表", "BS", "PL", "期末処理", "棚卸し", "未払計上", "前払処理".