1,528 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold the test framework and CI/CD pipeline for the project's engine. Creates the tests/ directory structure, engine-specific test runner configuration, and GitHub Actions workflow. Run once during Technical Setup phase before the first sprint begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After architecture is complete, produces a flat actionable rules sheet for programmers — what you must do, what you must never do, per system and per layer. Extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. More immediately actionable than ADRs (which explain why).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于生成或编辑图表、图形资产、海报、UI 样机、产品图、信息图、学术图、漫画、头像、分镜、品牌板或图像编辑工作流，尤其是导出 PNG 需要视觉质检和有限自动修复时。文字密集图表优先使用确定性的 Mermaid/SVG/HTML/canvas 源；浏览器可打开的技术图优先使用 HTML technical diagrams，覆盖系统蓝图、架构图、部署拓扑、Agent runtime、memory flow、before-after architecture、流程、序列、数据流、生命周期、runbook、PII/数据血缘和状态机；不要用于不涉及生成图像的普通 UI 打磨。中文触发词包括 图片生成、图像编辑、图表生成、架构图、系统蓝图、部署拓扑、Agent runtime、memory flow、before-after architecture、工作流图、数据流、生命周期图、状态机、ER 图、UML、序列图、海报、UI 样机、产品图、信息图、学术图、漫画、头像、分镜、品牌板、PNG 自检、自动修复。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating editable technical diagrams with draw.io / diagrams.net sources, including architecture diagrams, ERD, UML, sequence diagrams, flowcharts, ML model diagrams, official shape lookup, brand symbols, Graphviz auto-layout, codebase structure maps, .drawio validation, or draw.io CLI export fallback. Do not use for ordinary raster image generation, freehand sketches, interactive canvas/Three.js scenes, or decorative SVG animation. Chinese triggers include draw.io, diagrams.net, editable architecture diagrams, .drawio, ER diagrams, UML, sequence diagrams, auto layout, shape retrieval, code structure diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when generating or editing diagrams, charts, visual assets, posters, UI mockups, product images, infographics, academic figures, comics, avatars, storyboards, brand boards, or image-edit workflows, especially when exported PNGs need visual QA and bounded self-repair. Prefer deterministic Mermaid/SVG/HTML/canvas sources for text-heavy diagrams; use HTML technical diagrams for browser-ready system blueprints, architecture, deployment topology, agent runtime, memory flow, before-after architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle, runbook, PII/data-lineage, and state-machine diagrams. Do not use for ordinary UI polish without generated imagery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds a structured investigation in scratch/ for empirical research and documentation. Use when the user says "start an investigation" or wants to: trace code paths or data flow ("trace from X to Y", "what touches X", "follow the wiring"), document system architecture comprehensively ("document how the system works", "archeology"), investigate bugs ("figure out why X happens"), explore technical feasibility ("can we do X?"), or explore design options ("explore the API", "gather context", "design alternatives"). Creates dated folder with README. NOT for simple code questions or single-file searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete B2B SaaS marketing agency powered by 90 AI agents across 17 specialties. This is the entry point for ALL marketing requests. Routes to the right specialist team: content marketing, SEO, paid media, social media, email marketing, design, sales enablement (including technical presales — demos, proofs of concept, security questionnaires), product marketing, account-based marketing (ABM), partnerships and channel programs (co-marketing, marketplace GTM, channel conflict and deal registration, partner economics), growth, analytics, project management, or client operations. Use this skill when the request spans multiple disciplines or when unsure which specialist to invoke. Also triggers on: marketing help, marketing team, marketing agency, what can you do, marketing capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design clean, graphics-first technical presentations and posters with logical slide progression, visual hierarchy, purposeful motion, and complementary speaker notes. Use for research talks, conference slides, seminars, defenses, posters, or figure-focused presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education (CTE) Secondary School Teacher — deciding whether a student is authorized to run a piece of shop equipment, diagnosing a Perkins V industry-credential attainment gap, placing a student into a work-based learning slot, resolving an articulation-credit dispute with a partner college, or triaging a CTSO competition-prep versus baseline-instruction time conflict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional dancer — preparing for a company audition, managing rehearsal load against injury risk, deciding whether to dance through pain or report it, negotiating a casting or return-to-dance plan with a rehearsal director, or critiquing a performance for technical and artistic fidelity to the choreography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Systems Manager (IT Manager/Director/CIO-adjacent) — planning IT infrastructure and systems strategy, evaluating a technology vendor or platform decision, allocating an IT budget, or managing IT risk (security, uptime, technical debt) at an organizational level. Broader than the devops-sre or software-engineer roles — this one owns IT as a business function, not a specific engineering discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Civil Engineer — sizing stormwater detention/drainage systems, checking foundation bearing capacity against a geotechnical report, verifying IBC/ASCE 7 code compliance for site civil work, reviewing construction RFIs against stamped drawings, or evaluating value-engineering changes for safety-margin impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Technology Officer — deciding build vs buy for a core system, choosing whether an architecture bet is worth a full rewrite, sizing an SLA/uptime commitment against engineering cost, structuring engineering teams around a product roadmap, or writing the technical risk section of a board update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep research on technical topics using EXA tools with intelligent two-tier caching. Use when user asks to research a topic, investigate best practices, look up information, find patterns, or explore architectures. Also invoked by /research command. Triggers: "research", "look up", "investigate", "deep dive", "find information about", "what are best practices for", "how do others implement".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through structured collaborative documentation creation. Use when user wants to write documentation, update README, create architecture docs, draft proposals, technical specs, decision docs, refactor documentation, create API docs, or document code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Enhanced with live Ahrefs (page authority, referring domains) and GSC (search performance, top keywords) data when MCPs are available. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing mathematical, logical, algorithmic, or technical proof from its stated conclusion backward as a bounded AND/OR graph of exact obligations. Use to reconstruct conclusion dependencies, determine whether a proof-supplied route establishes the conclusion, or expose hidden assumptions, unmet side conditions, cycles, overly strong steps, or silent route switches. For a source-mapped Lamport rendering use convert-lamport, and for forward hierarchy, construct, and scope conformance use forward-lamport before this skill. This does not decide full theorem-level entailment by searching for a different proof; do not turn the audit into a linear reversed proof, exhaustive proof search, or replacement proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。