「assess」の検索結果

OWASP Top 10 for Web Applications (2025) knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating web application security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP CI/CD Top 10 knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating CI/CD pipeline security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand RAI planner reference pack covering Phase 1 capture, Phase 2 risk classification and the optional Mural board bootstrap, Phase 5 impact assessment, and Phase 6 review and backlog handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating large language model security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Infrastructure Top 10 knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating internal IT infrastructure security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP MCP Top 10 knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating Model Context Protocol security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure by Design principles knowledge base for assessing security-first design, development, and deployment across the software lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently assess an RPI plan without editing it. Use when an implementation-ready plan needs a credibility check or a revised plan needs its earlier findings reconciled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Agentic Security Top 10 knowledge base for identifying, assessing, and remediating AI agent system security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or assess an evidence-grounded, falsifiable outcome hypothesis: a testable prediction of what measurable business result will change, for whom, by when, and how leading and lagging indicators will prove or disprove it. Use when framing measurable outcomes, turning an MVP, POC, feature, or technical initiative into a beneficiary result, defining targets and indicators, or judging whether evidence is strong enough to invest. Also applies to business outcome hypotheses, value hypotheses, and outcome statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and validate durable data and ML feasibility studies using the Feasibility Study Interchange Profile, constrained YAML authority, UUID URN identity, lifecycle lineage, and evidence traceability. Use when assessing whether available data and technical evidence support a proposed outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning experimentation reference for model-experimentation conventions, experiment tracking and reproducibility, dataset and model abstractions, ML engagement fundamentals, and model-production readiness. Use when standing up ML experimentation infrastructure or assessing whether a trained model is ready for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when comparing two videos to analyze compression results or quality differences. Generates interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Triggers when users mention "compare videos", "video quality", "compression analysis", "before/after compression", or request quality assessment of compressed videos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse competitor moves and translate them into strategic implications for your product roadmap. Use when a competitor announces a new feature, pricing change, partnership, or strategic shift, or when producing a periodic competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with reactive-vs-proactive assessment, threat ratings, specific roadmap implications, and recommended responses with owners. For a recurring whole-market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a prioritised compliance checklist for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, or other frameworks with a gap analysis. Use when asked for a compliance checklist, gap analysis, readiness assessment, or audit preparation for any regulatory framework. Produces a structured checklist with prioritised gaps, quick wins, and evidence requirements. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models. Not a substitute for legal or compliance professional advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for recruitment at a Chinese state-owned enterprise (国企 / 央企), including its written test and interview: what these employers assess, the typical stages, answers that show fit and stability, and the questions to ask about the role. Use when asked 国企面试怎么准备, 央企校招, 国企笔试考什么, 国企和互联网怎么选, 国企面试问题, or prepare for a state-owned enterprise interview in China. Produces a stage map to confirm against the recruitment notice, a written-test preparation plan, a question bank with answer points, a mock interview with feedback, and a comparison with private-sector offers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an incoming insurance claim: check the coverage trigger against policy wording, band severity and complexity, screen for fraud indicators, set a first-pass reserve range, and route with an SLA. Use when asked to triage a claim, review a first notice of loss (FNOL), assess a new claim, decide fast-track vs adjuster routing, or screen a claim for SIU referral. Produces a structured triage note with coverage view, severity band, indicator screen, reserve range, and a routing recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a 复盘 (fupan), the structured project review widely used in Chinese companies: review the goal, assess the result, analyse why, and draw rules for next time, with a blame-free tone and owned actions. Use when asked 帮我做复盘, 项目复盘, 活动复盘, 复盘会怎么开, or a fupan or retrospective in Chinese. Produces the 复盘 document in Chinese with goal versus result, root causes split into controllable and uncontrollable, lessons stated as reusable rules, and an action list with owners and dates, plus a meeting agenda.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 大模型备案怎么做, 生成式人工智能服务备案还是登记, 算法备案流程, AI 生成内容标识怎么加, 我们接了已备案的大模型还要备案吗, or prepare a generative AI product for launch in mainland China. Produces the obligations that apply (generative AI service filing, registration for apps built on a filed model, algorithm filing, AI-generated content labelling), the documents and security self-assessment to prepare, a launch checklist, and the questions for the provincial cyberspace administration, each marked to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a contract clause in plain English — what it means, who it favours, the realistic risk, and what to negotiate. Use when asked what a clause means, to decode legal language, explain a term in a contract, or assess whether a provision is standard or aggressive. Produces a plain-language translation, a who-does-this-favour read, a risk rating, and concrete redline suggestions. Not legal advice; confirm with counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。