2,514 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use FFCV to convert datasets into .beton files, build fast PyTorch loader pipelines, handle image and custom fields/transforms, and tune cache, traversal, and throughput behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when working with Hugging Face Datasets: loading local or Hub datasets, defining Features schemas, processing/streaming datasets, converting formats, sharing to the Hub, managing cache/offline behavior, or using datasets-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use BentoML to author model-serving Services, build and containerize Bentos, run HTTP/gRPC servers and clients, manage models, operate the CLI and BentoCloud, and configure observability or production runtime behavior. Use when tasks mention BentoML, bentoml service.py, bentofile.yaml, Bento build/serve/deploy, BentoCloud, or BentoML model stores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Managing consent for analytics cookies and implementing privacy-preserving measurement. Covers GA4 privacy configuration, consent mode fallback behavior, aggregate reporting alternatives, and cookieless measurement approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding retries, backoff, or concurrency limits to Spring Boot 4 / Spring Framework 7 code with core Retryable and ConcurrencyLimit support. Covers enablement, backoff, proxy limits, and behavior after retries are exhausted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evolving aggregate invariants, value objects or domain events in an existing DDD-style Spring Boot 4 application, or when DDD is explicitly requested. Preserve existing API identifiers and architecture when changing domain behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding retries, backoff, or concurrency protection to Spring Boot 3 / Spring Framework 6 services. Covers Spring Retry or Resilience4j selection, proxy behavior, and transaction limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evolving aggregate invariants, value objects or domain events in an existing DDD-style Spring Boot 3 application, or when DDD is explicitly requested. Preserve existing API identifiers and architecture when changing domain behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory skills, conventions, and behavioral rules for Avalonia UI development using the Zafiro toolkit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand audience demographics, preferences, behavior patterns, and engagement quality across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a skill is brittle, drifting, repeatedly failing, or needs a Reliable Skill Contract. Trigger for phrases like skill lifeguard, reliable skill, self-maintaining skill, negative examples, verification checkpoints, drift signals, replay hooks, or failure log to skill patch. Audits or patches skills so high-value workflows include explicit forbidden behaviors, checkpoints, machine-checkable done conditions, replay or smoke hooks, and drift detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Four-phase debugging framework for any technical issue. Use when encountering bugs, errors, or unexpected behavior. Prevents random fix attempts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。